Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:51:53.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Study Of English Diets By The Individual Method: Part II. Women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

E. M. Widdowson  and
R. A. McCance
E. M. Widdowson
Affiliation:
From the Biochemical Department, King's College Hospital, London
R. A. McCance
Affiliation:
From the Biochemical Department, King's College Hospital, London
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The food intakes of sixty-three women of the English middle class have been studied by the individual method and compared with those of men which were described in a previous paper.

2. The average calorie consumption was 2187 per day. Although it is not suggested that this is the optimum intake, it would appear from these results that the “man value” of a woman is 0·7, and not 0·8 as is usually supposed. The individual calorie consumptions varied from 1453 to 3110 per day.

3. The average daily protein intake was 67 g., and no subject was eating more than 90 g.

4. Fat and carbohydrate contributed almost equally to the calorie value of the diet. The proportion of total calories derived from fat (42·7 per cent.) is higher than any previously recorded figures in Europe or America.

5. The average amount of calcium in the diets was 0·63 g. per day. Fourteen individuals were having less than 0·5 g., and one only 0·23 g.

6. The mean intakes of total and available phosphorus were 1·32 and 1·09 g. respectively.

7. A study has been carried out on six women, whose husbands were unemployed. Their intake of all dietary constituents, except carbohydrate, were considerably lower than were found for the women of the middle class.

Acknowledgments. The authors wish to thank Miss E. E. Franklin for her help with the calculations, Miss A. Cameron for her co-operation with regard to the unemployed, and all the subjects, without whose support the investigation would never have been carried out. One of us (E. M. W.) is indebted to the Medical Eesearch Council for a part-time grant.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , July 1936 , pp. 293 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1936

References

REFERENCES

Actuarial Society of America (1929). Medical Impairment Studies.Google Scholar
Atwater, W. O. (1902). U.S. Dept. Agric. Farmers' Bull. 142, 88.Google Scholar
Biowood, E. J. and Roost, G. (1934). L'Alimentation rationlle. Publ. de l'Institut Solvay, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
British Medical Association (1933). Report of Committee on Nutrition.Google Scholar
Cathcart, E. P. and Murray, A. M. T. (1931 a). J. Nutrition, 3, 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cathcart, E. P. and Murray, A. M. T. (1931 b). Med. Res. Counc. Special Report Series, No. 151.Google Scholar
Clark, M. L. (1933). Brit. Med. J. ii, 977.Google Scholar
Denis, W. and Borgstrom, P. (1924). J. Biol. Chem. 61, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, E. (1927). U.S. Dept. Agric. Tech. Bull. No. 8. Washington.Google Scholar
Hawley, E. (1929). U.S. Dept. Agric. Circular, No. 89.Google Scholar
Hetler, R. A. (1932). J. Nutrition, 5, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M. M., Evers, H. P. et al. (1934). Ibid. 7, 89.Google Scholar
League of Nations (1932). Quart. Bull, of the Health Organisation.Google Scholar
League of Nations (1935). Report on the Physiological Bases of Nutrition.Google Scholar
Lusk, G. (1917). The Science of Nutrition. 3rd ed.Google Scholar
Magee, H. E. et al. (1935). Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 28, 713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccance, R. A. and Widdowson, E. M. (1935). Biochem. J. 29, 2694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Health (1934). Committee on Nutrition. The Criticism and Improvement of Diets.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. (1935). J. Amer. Diet. Ass. 11, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, J. B. (1936). Food, Health and Income. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Peller, S. (1931). Z.f. Ernährung, 1, 247.Google Scholar
Sherman, H. C. (1920). J. Biol. Chem. 44, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, H. C. (1933). Chemistry of Food and Nutrition. New York.Google Scholar
Stiebeling, H. K. and Ward, M. M. (1933). U.S. Dept. Agric. Circular, No. 296.Google Scholar
Toverud, K. U. and Toverud, G. (1930). Act. paediat. 2, 543.Google Scholar
Tyszka, v. (1935). Klin. Wochenschr. 14, 553 and 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, R. and Mallay, R. (1935). J. Amer. Diet. Ass. 10, 453.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. (1936). J. Hygiene, 36, 269.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. and Mccance, R. A. (1936). Ibid. 36, 13.Google Scholar