Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:04:48.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The study of infectious intestinal disease in England: risk factors for cases of infectious intestinal disease with Campylobacter jejuni infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2001

L. C. RODRIGUES
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT
J. M. COWDEN
Affiliation:
Scottish Centre for Infection and Environmental Health
J. G. WHEELER
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT
D. SETHI
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT
P. G. WALL
Affiliation:
Food Safety Authority of Ireland
P. CUMBERLAND
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT
D. S. TOMPKINS
Affiliation:
Leeds Public Health Laboratory
M. J. HUDSON
Affiliation:
Centre for Applied Microbiology and Research (CAMR), Salisbury
J. A. ROBERTS
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT
P. J. RODERICK
Affiliation:
Southampton University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This is a case-control study aimed at identifying risk factors for intestinal infection with Campylobacter jejuni. Cases were defined as subjects with diarrhoea occurring in community cohorts or presenting to General Practitioners (GPs) with Campylobacter jejuni in stools. Controls were selected from GP lists or cohorts, matched by age, sex, and GP practice. Travel abroad and consumption of chicken in a restaurant were statistically significantly associated with being a case. There was no statistically significant risk associated with consumption of chicken other than in restaurants nor with reported domestic kitchen hygiene practices. Consumption of some foods was associated with a lower risk of being a case. Most cases remained unexplained. We suggest that infection with low numbers of micro-organisms, and individual susceptibility may play a greater role in the causation of campylobacter infection than previously thought. It is possible that in mild, sporadic cases infection may result from cross contamination from kitchen hygiene practices usually regarded as acceptable. Chicken may be a less important vehicle of infection for sporadic cases than for outbreaks, although its role as a source of infection in both settings requires further clarification in particular in relation to the effect of domestic hygiene practices. The potential effect of diet in reducing the risk of campylobacteriosis requires exploration.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2001 Cambridge University Press