Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:23:17.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sulphuretted hydrogen production by bacteria in a lead mine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. W. Edington
J. W. Edington
Affiliation:
From the Department of Bacteriology, Sheffield University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This investigation was initiated when twelve miners who were working in a certain part of the Mill Close Lead Mine complained of smarting of the eyes associated with marked congestion of the conjunctivae. They also suffered from a stinging sensation in the nose and throat. The particular area in which they were working differed from other parts of the mine in that there was a strong smell of sulphuretted hydrogen present. After recovery, and when the ventilation had been improved, the men were able to continue working in that area without experiencing further discomfort. The interesting part of the investigation was tracing the origin of the sulphuretted hydrogen. The odour proceeded from collections of mine water which the miners very appropriately called “stink water”. In this there was a deposit of sulphur mixed with black sludge which also smelt strongly of H2S. The sludge consisted of slightly gelatinous black masses mixed with a whitish felt work of a filamentous organism. On microscopical examination the filaments were seen to contain sulphur globules, and often to arise from a mass of black material. This black material consisted of sulphur and inorganic salts in a slimy matrix, the black colour being due to the presence of ferrous sulphide. On further examination these masses were found to be teeming with other bacteria, Gram-negative bacilli and spirilla, both of which were motile, the spirilla being actively so.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 38 , Issue 6 , November 1938 , pp. 683 - 687
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1938

References

REFERENCES

Baars, J. K. (1930). Over sulfaatraductie door bacteriën. Dissert., Delft.Google Scholar
Beijerinck, M. W. (1895). Zbl. Bakt. Abt. 2, 1, 1, 48 and 104.Google Scholar
Van Delden, A. (1904). Zbl. Bakt. Abt. 2, 11, 81 and 113.Google Scholar
Hölschewnikoff, (1889). Fortschr. Med. 7, 201.Google Scholar
Keil, F. (1912). Beitr. Biol. Pfl. 11, 335.Google Scholar
Kluyver, A. J. & Donker, H. J. L. (1925). Verh. Akad. Wet. Amst. 28, 297 and 605.Google Scholar
Pownall, M. (1935).Brit. J. exp. Path. 16, 157.Google Scholar
Rabenhorst, L. (1865). Flora Europaea Algarum. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Winogradsky, S. (1887). Bot. Ztg, 45, 489.Google Scholar
Winogradsky, S. (1888). Beiträge zur Morphologie und Physiologie der Bacterien. Heft 1. Zur Morphologie und Physiologie der Schwefel Bacterien Leipzig (A. Felix), p. 39.Google Scholar
Zelinsky, N. D. (1893). Proc. Russ. phys. chem. Soc. 25, 298. Referred to in Microorganisms in Water, by P. and G. Frankland, p. 458, 1894. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar