Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:29:12.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toxin production, adherence and protein expression by clinical Aeromonas spp. isolates in broth and human pooled ileostomy fluid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

M. H. Wilcox ,
A. Cook ,
I. Geary  and
A. Eley
M. H. Wilcox*
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental and Clinical Microbiology, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX
A. Cook
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental and Clinical Microbiology, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX
I. Geary
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental and Clinical Microbiology, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX
A. Eley
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental and Clinical Microbiology, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX
*
* Correspondence and current address: Dr M. H. Wilcox, Clinical Microbiology and Public Heath Laboratory, Level 6, Addenbrooks's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QW.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The physiological behaviour of clinical Aeromonas spp. isolates was compared following culture in a conventional broth and human pooled ileostomy fluid (PIF). Protein expression was markedly affected by the growth medium, with an overall reduction in whole cell proteins in bacteria grown in ileostomy fluid. In addition, novel outer membrane proteins were produced in PIF but not in broth. The majority of A. hydrophila and A. sobria isolates produced toxin in both broth and PIF. whereas no cytotoxin positive A. caviae were found. Toxin titres were at least two doubling dilutions higher in 40% and 21% of A. hydrophila and A. sobria isolates, respectively, following culture in brain heart infusion broth compared with PIF. Bacterial adherence to Vero and A-549 cells was significantly more common in A. hydrophila (53%) and A. sobria (64%) than in A. caviae (15%) (P < 0·01). We observed increased adherence by 6 Aeromonas strains previously classified as adherence-positive, but not by 6 non-adherers, in PIF compared with brain heart infusion broth. The influence of growth medium on the expression of potential virulence determinants by Aeromonas spp. provides a rationale for the use of human ileostomy fluid in future in vitro studies, in order to simulate the nutrient conditions found in vivo.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 113 , Issue 2 , October 1994 , pp. 235 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

References

REFERENCES

1.Burke, V, Gracey, M, Robinson, J, Peek, D, Beaman, J, Bundell, CThe mierobiology of childhood gastroenteritis: Aeromonas speeies and other infective agents. J Infeet Dis 1983: 148:68–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Mikhail, IA, Fox, E, Haberberger, RL, Ahmed, MH, Abbatte, EAEpidemiology of bacterial pathogens associated with infectious diarrhoea in Djibouti. J Clin Microbiol 1990: 28: 956–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Deodhar, LP, Saraswathi, K, Varudkar, A, Aeromonas spp. and their association with human diarrheal disease. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29: 853–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Pazzaglia, G, Sack, RB, Salazar, E, Yi, A, Chea, E, Leon-Barua, R, Guerrero, CE, Palomino, J, High frequency of coinfecting enteropathogens in Aeromonas-associated diarrhea of hospitalised Peruvian infants. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29: 1151–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Agger, WA, McCormick, JD, Gurwith, MJClinical and microbiological features of Aeromonas hydrophila-associsited diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 21: 909–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Janda, MJ. Recent advances in the study of the taxonomy, pathogenieity and infectious syndromes associated with the genus Aeromonas. Clin Microbiol Rev 1991: 4: 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Millership, SE, Barer, MR, Tabaqchali, S, Toxin production by Aeromonas spp. from different sources. J Med Microbiol 1986: 22: 311–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Watson, IM, Robinson, JO, Burke, V, Gracey, M, Invasiveness of Aeromonas spp. in relation to biotype. virulence factors, and clinical features. J Clin Microbiol 1985: 22: 48–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Janda, JM, Clark, RB, Brenden, R, Virulence of Aeromonas species as assessed through mouse lethality studies. Curr Microbiol 1985: 12: 163–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Wilcox, MH, Cook, AM, Eley, A, Spencer, RC. Aeromonas spp. as a potential cause of diarrhoea in children. J Clin Pathol 1992: 45: 959–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Namdari, H, Bottone, EJ. Microbiologic and clinical evidence supporting the role of Aeromonas cariae as a pediatrie pathogen. J Clin Microbiol 1990: 28: 837–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Namdari, H, Bottone, EJ. Cytotoxin and enterotoxin production as factors delineating enteropathogenicity of Aeromonas cariae. J Clin Microbiol 1990: 28: 1796–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Janda, MJ, Duffey, PS. Mesophilic aeromonads in human disease: current taxonomy, laboratory identification, and infectious disease spectrum. Rev Infect Dis 1988: 10: 980–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Pal, A, Ramamurthy, T, Ghosh, AR, Pal, SC, Takeda, Y, Nair, GBVirulence traits of Aeromonas strains in relation to species and source of isolation. Zbl Bakt 1992: 276: 418–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Grey, PA, Kirov, SMAdherence to HEp-2 cells and enteropathogenic potential of Aeromonas spp. Epidemiol Infect 1993: 110: 279–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Ala Aldeen, DAA, Barer, MR. Bacterial growth and toxin production in ileostomy effluents. J Med Microbiol 1989: 28: 287–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Namdari, H, Bottone, EJ. Suicide phenomenon in mesophilic aeromonads as a basis for species identification. J Clin Microbiol 1989: 27: 788–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Wilcox, MH, Cook, AM, Thickett, KJ, Eley, A, Spencer, RC. Phenotypic methods for speciating clinical Aeromonas spp. isolates. J Clin Pathol 1992: 45: 1079–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Carrello, A, Silburn, KA, Budden, JR, Chang, BJ. Adhesion of clinical and environmental Aeromonas isolates to HEp-2 cells. J Med Microbiol 1988: 26: 19–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Smith, DGE, Wilcox, MH, Finch, RG, Denyer, SP, Williams, P, Characterisation of the cell envelope proteins of Staphylococcus epidermidis cultured in human peritoneal dialysate. Infect Immun 1991: 59: 617–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Wilcox, MH, Williams, P, Smith, DGE, Modun, B, Finch, RG, Denver, SP. Variation in the expression of cell envelope proteins of coagulase-negative staphylococci cultured under iron-restricted conditions in human peritoneal dialysate. J Gen Microbiol 1992: 137: 2561–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Modun, B, Williams, P, Pike, WJ, Cockayne, A, Arbuthnott, JP, Finch, RG, Denyer, SPCell envelope proteins of Staphyloroccus epidermidis grown in viro in a peritoneal chamber implant. Infect Immun 1992: 60: 2551–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Schumacher-Perdreau, F, Chambers, H, Wilcox, MH, Peters, G, Sande, M, Pulverer, GStaphyloroccus epidermidis wildtype and its slime-negative mutant equally induce endocarditis in rabbits.32nd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.New Orleans.1993. Abstract 148.Google Scholar
24.Brown, MEW, Williams, PThe influence of environment on envelope properties affecting survival of bacteria in infections. Ann Rev Microbiol 1985: 39: 527–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Ho, ASY, Mietzner, TA, Smith, AJ, Schoolnik, GKThe pili of Aeromonas hydrophila: identification of an environmentally regulated ‘mini pilin’. J Exp Med 1990: 172: 795–806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Woods, GL, Young, AUse of A-549 cells in a clinical virology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 1988: 26: 1026–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar