Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:21:13.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding of HIV/AIDS in the international border area, Manipur: Northeast India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2019

A. L. Sharma
Affiliation:
Cancer and Molecular Biology Division, Department of Biotechnology, Manipur University, Canchipur-795003, Manipur, India
T. R. Singh
Affiliation:
Cancer and Molecular Biology Division, Department of Biotechnology, Manipur University, Canchipur-795003, Manipur, India
L. S. Singh*
Affiliation:
Cancer and Molecular Biology Division, Department of Biotechnology, Manipur University, Canchipur-795003, Manipur, India
*
Author for correspondence: L. S. Singh, E-mail: shanju.lisam@manipuruniv.ac.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Manipur, an international border region has the highest incidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 infection in India. Nevertheless, there have been no analytical reviews of research article published within this region. In this review, the authors aim to draw the attention of policy makers, medical practitioners and researchers in adopting new strategies to limit the expansion of HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) not only in Manipur but also in other international border areas. A systematic search for published literature in last decade was performed based on the keywords ‘Manipur’ and ‘HIV’ using the PubMed. Twenty-six articles were selected and reviewed. There were high incidence of drug resistance (53%), emergence of recombinant virus (32%) and increased incidence of co-infection with hepatitis C virus. The prime cause of the HIV is due to the uses of ‘heroin’ smuggled from the ‘South Asia Golden Triangle’ and complex patterns of cross-border movement for trade and commerce. The drug abuse, social stigma, geographical location and resource limitation and socio-political problem of the region have contributed strongly on spreading and failure of preventively programme of HIV/AIDS. This review will provide vital knowledge for the policy makers and clinicians for sentinel surveillance of AIDS pandemic in Manipur and other international border regions.

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019

Introduction

Human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) is a life-threatening disease and remains an immense threat to all over the world [Reference Davaro and Thirumalai1]. Some countries are severely affected, of which India is one of them. India has the world's third-largest population suffering from HIV/AIDS, first and second being South Africa and Nigeria, respectively. HIV/AIDS remains a problem in India ever since it was detected for the first time in the year 1986 among the female sex workers (FSW) in Chennai [Reference Simoes2]. It was assumed that foreigners in India were responsible for the HIV infections since they were travelling frequently in and out of the country. Sexual mode of HIV transmission was the main mode of HIV transmission in India. Initially, the progress of HIV epidemic was relatively slow but over the years the number of HIV-infected persons has increased and become a major public health problem. The spread of HIV in India was primarily restricted to the southern and north-eastern regions of the country.

Four years later, HIV case was registered for the first time in Manipur, an international border region to Myanmar, from a blood sample of an intravenous drug user (IDU) [3]. Since then, Manipur, a total area of about 22 327 km2 with a population of 2.7 million (density of 120 people per square kilometres) is reported to be hard hit epicentres of HIV/AIDS epidemic in India. Manipur, a far north-eastern corner of the country with hardly 0.2% of country's population is contributing nearly 8% of India's total HIV-positive cases. HIV infection rate among the IDUs had increased tremendously from 2% to 3% in 1989 to >50% in 1991 and 64% in 2000 [Reference Saha4]. The severity linked with the HIV/AIDS pandemic remains a problem to the state. HIV/AIDS has emerged as a serious public health emergency and seems like impossible task to halt the ever-increasing rate. Unlike other states of India, HIV transmission in this region is mainly correlated with the sharing of HIV-infected injecting equipment/needles among the IDUs [Reference Narain5]. IDUs are the easy prey for contracting HIV. Although the epidemic was initially described among IDUs, HIV is no longer confined to IDUs but it begins to appear in the general public.

In this review, the authors examine the causes, challenges and current scenario of HIV/AIDS in Manipur to draw the attention of policy makers, medical practitioners and researchers in adopting new strategies to limit the expansion of this deadly disease.

Material and methods

This scoping review was determined based on the following frame works; identifying the research publications; sorting out the relevant studies; opting the studies for review; gathering the information; summarizing and reporting [Reference Arksey and O'Malley6]. The review of published literature was deemed the most apt methodology for this project due to the lack of analytical reviews on HIV/AIDS in this international border area. We have tried to identify, organise the common themes and gaps regarding the transmission, molecular epidemiology, drug resistance (DR) and co-infection. This review was undertaken to examine the extent, range and nature of research activity; to determine whether a review is feasible and of value, to summarise research findings to policy makers, medical practitioners and identifying gaps in the existing evidence.

In August 2018, based on the keywords ‘Manipur’ and ‘HIV’, an advanced systematic search for published literature in English in the last decade (since 2008) was performed using the PubMed (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed), a free search engine accessing primarily the MEDLINE database of references and abstracts on life sciences and biomedical topics. Only the publications from 1 January 2008 to 31 August 2018 were taken into consideration. All the displayed articles were accessed and identified. The articles were further accessed in ISI Web of Science database by Clarivate Analytics. Only those publications in the journals included in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) list, 2018 (Clarivate Analytics/Thomson Reuters) were selected for this study. The selection of the article based on the journals within the ISI Web of Science database is to maintain a quality or standard of article to be reviewed in this study. The title, abstract, journals and full text of eligible publications were scrutinised independently by two authors. The articles which report empirical data with respect to the transmission, molecular epidemiology, DR and co-infection in Manipur were further considered. This systematic search clearly indicated that the review literature on this topic is limited. We further access the electronic databases at the Manipur AIDS Control Society (MACS) (https://manipursacs.nic.in/), Manipur for additional information. The final step in our methodological approach involved plotting the information from published literature; extraction of relevant data and charted them to assist with our analysis of the findings.

Results

Forty-seven articles were found to be published since a decade when we search in the PubMed using the keyword mentioned above. Out of the 47 articles, 26 articles were selected for this study. The selection was based on the articles that published in the journal within the web of science database and also related to empirical data with respect to transmission, molecular epidemiology, DR and co-infection of HIV/AIDS in Manipur. Three articles were found to be overlapped with the HIV literatures that described both the IDUs and sexual behaviour. We have also included the data from MACS that focused on the demographic data, socio-economic data, incidence rate, etc. The articles have been further classified as shown in Figure 1.

Fig. 1. A flow chart showing the process of articles selection for this review.

HIV and injecting drug users

Injecting drug use has received increased attention because of the high risk of HIV transmission and, more recently, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). Since last decade, there were at least 16 publications related with IDUs. In 2008, Mahanta et al. [Reference Mahanta7] showed that 98% of the IDU use injecting ‘heroin’ and 63% of them shared their injecting equipment and containers. This unsafe injecting practice exposed themselves in the risk of contracting blood-borne viruses. According to Kermode et al. [Reference Kermode8] in 2009, the main theme of using drugs was for pleasure-seeking, influence of peers and economic reasons. The idea of injecting drug was initiated by another person (most commonly a friend, who helps in injecting the drugs) in the well-established social networks. Another study showed that to deal the problem of IDUs, opioid substitution therapy is effective and leads to the improvements in the quality of their lives [Reference Armstrong9, Reference Kumar10]. A study by Armstrong et al. [Reference Armstrong, Humtsoe and Kermode11] in 2011 showed that those IDUs having the knowledge of HIV prevention services are more likely to engage in safe injecting, sexual practices and avoid risky characters. Chakrapani et al. [Reference Chakrapani12] in 2011 showed that effective HIV prevention and care programmes for IDUs may hinge on several contexts; supportive government policy on harm reduction programmes; an end to harassment by military, and anti-drug groups, with education of these entities regarding harm reduction and creation of partnerships with the public health sector. However, in another study by Suohu et al. [Reference Suohu13] in 2012 revealed that if the IDUs practice the unsafe injection by sharing injecting equipment and risky sexual practices, it magnifies the risk of HIV infection. Medhi et al. [Reference Medhi14] in 2012 estimated the sizes of IDU population in five districts of Manipur. Not only men but women also used injecting heroin according to Kermode et al. in 2012 [Reference Kermode15]. The study further showed that heroin on women has negative health impact such as reproductive health, mental health, social exclusion, violence, children's welfare and financial difficulties. Lalmuanpuii et al. [Reference Lalmuanpuii16] in 2013 showed that harm reduction approach in Manipur could be even managed better. In 2013, Kermode et al. revealed that 64% of young women (mean age of 31 year) who used heroin and alcohol were widowed or divorced. It also further indicates that women used drug and alcohol to avoid symptoms of withdrawal, to suppress emotional pain, to overcome the shame of sex work, pleasure and widowhood [Reference Kermode17]. Another study by Armstrong et al. [Reference Armstrong18] in 2014 identified that the risky injecting practices were more common among younger people. Goswami et al. stated that improvements in safe injection practices and consistent condom use with regular partners enhance the HIV preventives measure [Reference Goswami19]. Armstrong et al. [Reference Armstrong20] in 2014 showed that most of the HIV-positive people who inject drug in Manipur were not aware of their HIV status and practice unsafe injection and sexual activities. However, when they become aware of their HIV status, they avoid their high-risk behaviours. So, it is utmost important to heighten the HIV testing coverage scale across the state. However, Ganju et al. [Reference Ganju, Ramesh and Saggurti21] in 2016 revealed that HIV testing among IDUs is low. Urgent program to build awareness among the IDUs about their HIV status is necessary to limit the expansion of HIV, timely treatment and care. Phukan et al. [Reference Phukan22] in 2017 provided a useful program to understanding the network pattern of injecting drug users for enriching the HIV prevention in this region.

HIV and sexual behaviours

In the last 10 years, there were five publications related with HIV and risky sexual behaviours. In 2008, Mahanta et al. [Reference Mahanta7] showed that nearly half of IDUs have engaged in sexual activity with at least one female in past one year. In another study by Suohu et al. [Reference Suohu13] in 2012 indicate that a significant proportion of IDUs engage in unsafe sex and have multiple sexual partners. They have more sexual partners as compared with non-injecting heroin users. More than 27% IDUs reported having had unsafe sex with two or more female partners within a year. These provide a higher chance of transmitting or contracting HIV. Armstrong et al. [Reference Armstrong18] in 2014 also showed that injecting drugs user aged 18–24 years had two or more female sexual partners (50.2%) compared with aged 35 or older (10.9%) indicating youth have higher risk. In the same year, Mishra et al. suggested that 40% of IDUs had a casual sexual partner and among those who had casual sexual partners, 65% of them have inconsistently used condom [Reference Mishra23]. IDUs who shared needles/syringes were more likely to engage in unprotected sex with their regular partners. Similarly, IDUs who reported inconsistent condom use with casual partners were more likely to report unprotected sex with their regular partners. Kermode et al. [Reference Kermode24] in 2015 reported that condom use with regular partners was poor: 40.6% used a condom the last time they had sex with their regular partners, and only 10.7% reported consistent condom use with their regular partners. Many participants with regular partners (40.2%) had more than one sexual partner in the last year, 29.5% had casual sex and 6.1% paid for sex in the last year. Consistent condom use with casual sexual partners was 32.9% and with paid partners was 36.5%. Half of those with regular partners (51.0%) had never had an HIV test, and 14.3% were HIV-positive.

Molecular epidemiology

During the last 10 years, there were six publications related with molecular epidemiology of HIV as shown in Table 1. In the year 2009, a study by Sarkar et al. on 30 HIV-infected IDU samples recruited from Manipur suggested the possibility of emerging new HIV-1 strains along with the dual infection [Reference Sarkar25]. The prevalence of subtype C with BC recombinants in the HIV tat gene was shown by Mullick et al. in year 2010 [Reference Mullick26]. In the same year, a study was conducted on HIV infection and host genetic mutation from the IDU samples of north-eastern states of India, including Manipur. It revealed that the absence of CCR5 mutant gene which suggests that they do not have any additional protection against HIV infection. They were vulnerable to acquire HIV infection due to high-risk behaviour and other related factors [Reference Sarkar27]. Sarkar et al. in two independent studies in year 2012 revealed the emergence of unique recombinant forms (URFs) [Reference Sarkar28, Reference Sarkar29]. Later Sharma et al. further analysed the viral subtype using larger sample size based on two gene pol and/or tat-vpu-env gene [Reference Sharma30], it showed that the HIV-1 genotypes distribution was 65.45% (72/110) subtype C, 32.73% (36/110) URFs and 1.82% (2/110) subtype B. The distribution of HIV-1 genotypes among the risk groups was: heterosexual: 58.33% (35/60) subtype C, 38.33% (23/60) URFs and 3.34% (2/60) subtype B; IDUs: 85.36% (35/41) subtype C, 9.76% (4/41) URFs and 4.88% (2/41) subtype B; mother to child (MTC): 50% (3/6) URFs and 50% (3/6) subtype C and blood transfusion: 100% (3/3) subtype C.

Table 1. Molecular epidemiology of HIV/AIDS in Manipur, North-east India: articles published since a decade and identified within the review

Drug resistance

In the last decade, there was only one publication related to resistance to HIV drugs. There has been no report on HIV DR profile in the north-eastern region of India till our recent study in the year 2016. According to our recent studies, 53% of HIV-infected antiretroviral therapy (ART) experienced individuals in Manipur harbour DR mutation at different DR sites [Reference Sharma31]. It also further revealed that 29%, 37% and 8% have mutations at the target sites of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and protease inhibitors (PIs) sites respectively. Predominant drug-resistant mutations at reverse transcriptase (RT) genes were M184V, T215Y, M41L and V108I and H221Y while at protease (PR) genes were M46I and I47V. Among the high-risk groups, IDUs have the highest number of drug-resistant mutations followed by heterosexual individuals. It was further shown that drug-resistant mutations at the target sites of RT inhibitors are high and these were found to have developed resistance to the primary ART drugs that are used in Manipur.

Co-infections

Since 2008, there was a single publication related with co-infection of HIV with other viruses. Kermode et al. [Reference Kermode32] in 2016 particularly focus on IDUs residing in two districts of Manipur. Among the 31% of HIV-positive IDUs, 95% were co-infected. HCV infection was associated with district, longer duration of injecting, injecting at least once daily, generally injecting with a used needle and syringe, and having had an HIV test. HCV/HIV co-infection was associated with district, older age, being employed, being widowed/divorced, longer duration of injecting and feeling at risk of HIV infection. The study also showed that high prevalence of HCV among the people living with IDU in Manipur where prevention, diagnosis and treatment options are limited.

Discussions

This review article provided an opportunity to investigate and update the HIV/AIDS epidemics in the Indo-Myanmar border. It is conducted based on the literature published with relevant data of HIV since the last decade. In this study, the authors show the factors which influenced high case of HIV/AIDS in Indo-Myanmar international border. The entire international borders all over the world have more or less similar issue. Behavioural networks also exist on the other segments of the border which causes havoc not only to both the countries but also to all the neighbouring countries. Based on the literature published, the authors show that drug abuse, social stigma, geographical location and resource limitation and socio-political problem of the region have contributed strongly on spreading and failure of preventive program of HIV/AIDS (Fig. 2). These factors are not just confined to this Indo-Myanmar international border location.

Fig. 2. Pictorial representation of factors which influence high HIV/AIDS.

Drug users and addiction have been intimately linked with HIV/AIDS since the beginning of the epidemic. Among the drug users in Manipur, ‘heroin’ which is locally better known as ‘number four’ is the most commonly (98%) used injecting drug [Reference Jadadish Mahanta, Das and Chelleng33]. Ever since, the emergence of ‘heroin’ in the year 1982 from South Asia Golden Triangle, the availability in illegal drug market has sharply increased. The route of illegal drug trafficking is assumed to be via twin town Tamu (Myanmar) and Moreh (Manipur, India). Moreh (Tengnoupal district of Manipur, India) is an important town in connection with the India–Myanmar relationship. It is one of the developing places in the field of trade and commerce on the Indian border with Myanmar while the city of Tamu on the other side of the border. Due to aforementioned reasons, the contiguity to the Golden Triangle has been the most important reason for the rapid rise of IDUs [Reference Medhi34]. Some youth also use oral pain reliever drugs in combination with heroin as leisure-seeking drugs [Reference James35]. Both forms of drugs can have serious negative health effects. However, use of ‘heroin’ intravenously is more deadly as it spreads the blood-borne viruses like HIV, HBV and HCV through shared injecting equipment [Reference Latkin36]. Young (aged 18–24 years) IDUs shared the injecting equipment more often when compared with the IDUs aged more than 35 years [Reference Armstrong18]. The teenager and middle-aged people (mixed age group peoples) of rich families use the drug as a kind of fashion initially. Economically middle and low class originated youths follow the trend. Addicted youths afford the expenditure on drugs by stealing or extorting small to valuable goods from others or their own houses. The crimes related to drugs addiction increases day by day and therefore such crimes have become a social problem. Domestic chaos and violence to women and children were the ultimate impact of drug users [Reference Sartor37]. The situation has become exacerbate because of wrong belief that drug-addicted youth give up addiction when they have their own family responsibility, and therefore parent insist the addicted youth for marriage without knowing of the fact that the drug-addicted youth might have been infected with HIV or hepatitis (HBVs/HCVs). It is worth to mention that more than half of the IDUs were infected with HIV, while substantial proportion of HIV-positive people with injecting drug users were still unaware of HIV-positive status [Reference Armstrong20]. Therefore, HIV-infected men have the risk of contracting of HIV infection to their female sexual partner [Reference Hammett38]. These created a chance of transmitting virus knowingly or unknowingly to spouses and then to their children [Reference Beyrer39]. It was previously reported that 95% who shared injecting equipment were engaged in unprotected sex with regular sexual partners, while 97% of IDUs who inconsistently use condom with casual partners were engaged in unprotected sex with their regular partners [Reference Mishra23]. Earlier, HIV/AIDS cases were confined among the IDUs. However, HIV/AIDS epidemic has now penetrated in the general population through the risk behaviours of IDUs. Meanwhile, housewives with single partners are gradually accounting for a larger proportion of infections. These monogamous women are primarily put at risk by the IDUs of their husband, from whom their infection is most probably acquired. The housewife is becoming the new face of the epidemic. However, when IDUs become aware of their HIV status, they reduce their high-risk behaviours. So, it is utmost important to heighten the HIV testing coverage scale across the entire international region.

FSWs are also an obvious risk for sexual transmission of HIV and hepatitis virus. Some female drug users engage in sex work to support their drug and alcohol use and vice versa [Reference Kermode15]. Since HIV/AIDS is mainly associated with the behavioural nature of a person, many people hesitate to disclose their HIV status [Reference Mahajan41]. There have been various reports of HIV/AIDS-infected persons being discriminated, stigmatised and ostracised by society. The widowers of HIV/AIDS spouses are not accepted by even own family [Reference Tarakeshwar42]. Therefore, stigma creates isolation mentally as well as physically from own family, friends and community resulting into depression or sometime suicide [Reference Ahmedani43]. The problem has wrought havoc in the state and it is the women who have become the casualties. Thus, stigma forms a barrier for effective HIV care and treatment [Reference Valenzuela44]. Even though antiretroviral medications are available for free, many individuals in the state choose not to seek treatment because of stigma and discrimination. Even though ART drug regimes had been started since in 1 April 2004 in Manipur, it remained inaccessible among HIV-infected patients due to hesitation on being registered themselves in ART Centers. This raises a serious public health issue for diagnosis and ART treatment. This study also indicates that the problems posed by injection drug use and HIV infection are particularly challenging in border regions.

Due to the geographical location and lack of good HIV/AIDS surveillance despite being high prevalence, the state, Manipur is deeply affected economically and socially due to the HIV epidemic. There are many HIV viral load test (VLT) centres in the country to monitor the progression of the disease, but none in the state has the highest HIV adult prevalence in the country. Therefore, blood samples are collected from HIV-positive patients and sent outside the state for VLT. Since blood samples are transported to the viral load testing centres only in bulk by air or surface transportation, blood samples are stored until sample collection reaches certain numbers. Therefore, patients get their viral load result after 3–4 weeks and by the time doctors know viral load of a patient, there is always possibility that the viral load has increased many folds. It may be another contributing factor of failure ART. In such situation, lives of HIV-positive patients are in danger since viral load is vital for different ART treatments. This shows that the necessity for effective HIV/AIDS surveillance even in resource-limiting area.

The frequent political and social turmoil in the state worsens the HIV/AIDS situation. The insurgency movements of Manipur led to enforcement of strict law by government in the form of Armed Forces Special Powers Acts (AFSPA). Under this act, possession of any illegal or suspicious goods is liable to be sent to custody without any warrant. Therefore, armed forces and local police are given special power to arrest any suspect including IDUs. The above situations consequence the ineffectiveness of the syringes exchange program, initiated to prevent the spread of HIV through sharing of syringes among IDUs in this region since carrying syringes is risky. As such preventive measure fails to stop sharing of injecting equipment. Hence, the law and order situation also influence negatively on the adherence to drug since lifesaving drugs could not be available in time due to sudden curfew and strikes. The socio-political problem hinders the effective programs initiated to limit the HIV transmission. The above factors finally influence the molecular epidemiology, DR and coinfection with other types of virus.

The prevalence of HIV-1 subtypes varies greatly depending on the geographic region [Reference McConnell45]. The subtype C is the most prevalent among all HIV-1 genetic subtypes and is predominant in India [Reference Seth46]. However, recombinant form of virus is most visible in border areas where different genetic variety meets. The extensive variability of HIV-1 genetic forms complicates diagnosis, treatment and prevention of HIV-1 infection. Therefore, HIV-1 subtype characterisation is becoming an important aspect to adequate clinical management of HIV-1-infection. Mullick [Reference Mullick26] in 2009 identified BC recombinant based on the tat gene and long terminal repeats from IDUs of Manipur. However, we have conducted extensive analysis of molecular epidemiology of HIV in the year 2016 using large sample size [Reference Sharma30]. Surprisingly, our study revealed the emergence of URF (32%) (Table 2). Manipur being a state of transit and commercial area that trade and connect the south East Asia may have the potential to introduce the complex genetic variant. The impact of foreign travellers and immigrants due to cross border transport in HIV epidemic is unknown. However, to identify the URFs found were formed locally or derived from Myanmar and/or other border area, molecular epidemiology across the border area need further investigation.

Table 2. Fact files of HIV/AIDS in Manipur

The ART has greatly advanced the management of HIV-1 infection [Reference Arts and Hazuda47]. ART drugs targeting the viral RT and PR activities can suppress HIV-1 replication to undetectable levels, leading to significant clinical benefit [Reference Arts and Hazuda47]. However, the main cause for the failure of ART is the presence of drug-resistance-associated mutations in the polymerase gene of HIV-1 [Reference Shafer and Schapiro48]. The emerging of HIVDR is mainly due to drug pressure of ART. The drug-resistant mutated virus can be transmitted from one individual to another. The effect of transmitted DR is a cause of concern for the scaling up of HIV programs, as HIV resistance also affects the efficacy of MTCT prophylaxis. There has been no report on HIV DR profile in the north eastern region of India till our recent studies. According to our recent studies, 53% of HIV-infected ART exposed individuals in Manipur harbour DR mutation at different DR sites. The study revealed that 29%, 37% and 8% have mutations at the target sites of NRTIs, NNRTIs and PIs sites, respectively [Reference Medhi34]. Individuals with drug-resistant mutation represent a great challenge for the future ART program. There is a necessity for monitoring the effectiveness of ART program to enhance the appropriate treatment responses.

HIV and HBVs/HCVs, the three important blood-borne infectious diseases, are the major public health concerns [Reference Manns49]. Due to co-infection, HIV and HBV/HCV simultaneously interact in a host complicating pathogenesis and disease progression of these two infections [Reference Lee and Dieterich50]. The deleterious effect of HIV leads to more rapid progression towards end-stage liver diseases (liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma) and higher risk for liver disease-related mortality in HIV/HBV co-infected individuals as compared with those infected with HIV or HBV only. Since the IDU is the chief transmission route of HIV/HBV co-infection in Manipur, the vulnerability of co-infection is predominant. HIV-HBV co-infection had 17 times higher incidence of liver disease-related deaths than HBV mono-infected ones. There are limited molecular studies on co-infection of HIV-HBV-HCV in the north-eastern region of India. However, Kermode et al. [Reference Kermode32] in 2016 particularly focus on IDUs residing in two districts of Manipur. Among the 31% HIV-positive IDUs, 95% were co-infected. Co-infection with other virus HBV/HCVs disease hampers the response to treatment [Reference Yang51]. This shows the high rate of co-infection with other blood-borne virus in this region. There is an urgency to manage the co-infection to limit the expansion of viral-borne diseases. Further, more research is required on the social, economic and cultural determinants of HIV/AIDS diagnosis, treatment and response to ART program. The collaborative approaches should be initiated so as to raise awareness and discuss risks associated with blood-borne viruses. Entire international border areas need to be enhanced the screening and detection systems of HIV and other blood borne viral diseases.

Conclusion

Since Manipur has the highest HIV prevalence rate in the country, any study with respect to HIV/AIDS in this region need to encourage not only to solve the health issues, but also the development issue of the country as whole. The prime cause of the HIV pandemic in this international border area is the uses of ‘heroin’ which are smuggled from the ‘South Asia Golden Triangle’. This study indicates that drug abuse, social stigma, geographical location and resource limitation and socio-political problem of the region have contributed strongly on spreading and failure of preventive program of HIV/AIDS. The HIV pandemic in this border region is much more complex than any other region of the country due to the emergence of recombinant HIV forms and DR HIV-1. Intravenous drug use and complex patterns of cross-border movement have combined to produce serious problems of HIV/AIDS pandemic. Improved knowledge about the causes, challenges and current scenario of HIV/AIDS should lead to improvement in the investigation and treatment of patients. However, in-depth studies such as the role of the emerging genetic variant in response to antiretroviral treatment, effect of co-infections with different viruses, etc., need to be inspired in all international borders to limit the expansion of more complex form of virus. It has also become evident that the importance to heighten the HIV testing coverage scale across the entire international region to reduce the risky behaviour of IDUs. The collaborative approaches to HIV prevention across all international borders as whole are anticipated in future. These will not only improve HIV prevention in international border region but also help to increase and diversify cross-border collaboration in HIV prevention and public health. These will certainly help to thrust for positive changes in governmental policies related to drug use and HIV prevention. Nevertheless, the information generated from this study will provide vital information for the policy makers, medical practitioners and researchers in adopting new strategies in restraining the transmission across the border area. The understanding developed from this study on the profile of the HIV-1 variants, DR, co-infections and main mode of transmission in a ‘geographic recombination hotspots’ may help to fight back the deadly AIDS pandemic.

Author ORCIDs

Lisam Singh, 0000-0001-5755-2234.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Science and Engineering Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology (DST) for National Post-Doctoral fellowship (N-PDF) to ALS (PDF/2016/001028). We also thank all Cancer and Molecular Biology Lab (CMBL) members that read and commented on this article.

Author contributions

ALS managed the production of this paper, drafting and data analysis processes. ALS, TRS and LSS were part of the committee that designed the scoping review and contributed to defining the objectives, parameters and methodology used within the study. LSS and TRS supervised the project.

Financial support

ALS was supported by a fellowship and research grant (Grant no.: PDF/2016/001028) as a part of National Post-Doctoral Fellowship (NPDF) program from the Science and Engineering Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India. The funders had no role in decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

Not required.

References

1.Davaro, RE and Thirumalai, A (2007) Life-threatening complications of HIV infection. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 22, 7381.Google Scholar
2.Simoes, EA et al. (1987) Evidence for HTLV-III infection in prostitutes in Tamil Nadu (India). Indian Journal of Medical Research 85, 335338.Google Scholar
3.Ministry of Health and Family welfare GoI. Manipur AIDS Control Society (MACS). Available at https://manipursacs.nic.in/.Google Scholar
4.Saha, MK et al. (2000) Prevalence of HCV & HBV infection amongst HIV seropositive intravenous drug users & their non-injecting wives in Manipur, India. Indian Journal of Medical Research 111, 3739.Google Scholar
5.Narain, JP et al. (1994) Risk factors for HIV transmission in India. AIDS (London, England) 8, S77S82.Google Scholar
6.Arksey, H and O'Malley, L (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8, 1932.Google Scholar
7.Mahanta, J et al. (2008) Injecting and sexual risk behaviours, sexually transmitted infections and HIV prevalence in injecting drug users in three states in India. AIDS (London, England) 22, S59S68.Google Scholar
8.Kermode, M et al. (2009) Killing time with enjoyment: a qualitative study of initiation into injecting drug use in north-east India. Substance Use and Misuse 44, 10701089.Google Scholar
9.Armstrong, G et al. (2010) Opioid substitution therapy in Manipur and Nagaland, north-east India: operational research in action. Harm Reduction Journal 7, 29.Google Scholar
10.Kumar, MS et al. (2009) Opioid substitution treatment with sublingual buprenorphine in Manipur and Nagaland in Northeast India: what has been established needs to be continued and expanded. Harm Reduction Journal 6, 4.Google Scholar
11.Armstrong, G, Humtsoe, C and Kermode, M (2011) HIV risk behaviours among injecting drug users in Northeast India following scale-up of a targeted HIV prevention programme. BMC Public Health 11, S9.Google Scholar
12.Chakrapani, V et al. (2011) Social-structural contexts of needle and syringe sharing behaviours of HIV-positive injecting drug users in Manipur, India: a mixed methods investigation. Harm Reduction Journal 8, 9.Google Scholar
13.Suohu, K et al. (2012) Understanding the association between injecting and sexual risk behaviors of injecting drug users in Manipur and Nagaland, India. Harm Reduction Journal 9, 40.Google Scholar
14.Medhi, GK et al. (2012) Size estimation of injecting drug users (IDU) using multiplier method in five districts of India. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 7, 9.Google Scholar
15.Kermode, M et al. (2012) Meeting the needs of women who use drugs and alcohol in North-east India – a challenge for HIV prevention services. BMC Public Health 12, 825.Google Scholar
16.Lalmuanpuii, M et al. (2013) Scale-up of a comprehensive harm reduction programme for people injecting opioids: lessons from north-eastern India. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 91, 306312.Google Scholar
17.Kermode, M et al. (2013) Falling through the cracks: a qualitative study of HIV risks among women who use drugs and alcohol in Northeast India. BMC International Health and Human Rights 13, 9.Google Scholar
18.Armstrong, G et al. (2014) Injecting drug use in Manipur and Nagaland, Northeast India: injecting and sexual risk behaviours across age groups. Harm Reduction Journal 11, 27.Google Scholar
19.Goswami, P et al. (2014) An assessment of an HIV prevention intervention among people who inject drugs in the states of Manipur and Nagaland, India. International Journal of Drug Policy 25, 853864.Google Scholar
20.Armstrong, G et al. (2015) Undiagnosed HIV among people who inject drugs in Manipur, India. AIDS Care 27, 288292.Google Scholar
21.Ganju, D, Ramesh, S and Saggurti, N (2016) Factors associated with HIV testing among male injecting drug users: findings from a cross-sectional behavioural and biological survey in Manipur and Nagaland, India. Harm Reduction Journal 13, 21.Google Scholar
22.Phukan, SK et al. (2017) An analysis of respondent-driven sampling with injecting drug users in a high HIV prevalent state of India. Harm Reduction Journal 14, 41.Google Scholar
23.Mishra, RK et al. (2014) HIV risk behaviors of male injecting drug users and associated non-condom use with regular female sexual partners in north-east India. Harm Reduction Journal 11, 5.Google Scholar
24.Kermode, M et al. (2015) Sexual behaviours of men who inject drugs in northeast India. Harm Reduction Journal 12, 4.Google Scholar
25.Sarkar, R et al. (2009) Implementation of a multiregion hybridization assay to characterize HIV-1 strains detected among injecting drug users in Manipur, India. Intervirology 52, 175178.Google Scholar
26.Mullick, R et al. (2010) Molecular characterization of tat gene and long terminal repeat region of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 detected among the injecting drug users (IDUs) of Manipur, India: identification of BC recombinants. Virus Research 147, 195201.Google Scholar
27.Sarkar, K et al. (2010) HIV infection and host genetic mutation among injecting drug-users of northeastern states of India. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition 28, 130136.Google Scholar
28.Sarkar, R et al. (2012) Near full-length genomic characterization of a HIV type 1 BC recombinant strain from Manipur, India. Virus Genes 45, 201206.Google Scholar
29.Sarkar, R et al. (2012) Emergence of a unique recombinant form of HIV-1 from Manipur (India). Journal of Clinical Virology 55, 274277.Google Scholar
30.Sharma, AL et al. (2017) Molecular epidemiology of HIV-1 among the HIV infected people of Manipur, Northeastern India: emergence of unique recombinant forms. Journal of Medical Virology 89, 989999.Google Scholar
31.Sharma, AL et al. (2016) Prevalence of drug resistance associated mutations among the anti retroviral therapy exposed HIV-1 infected individuals in Manipur, Northeast India. Current HIV Research 14, 360370.Google Scholar
32.Kermode, M et al. (2016) High burden of hepatitis C & HIV co-infection among people who inject drugs in Manipur, Northeast India. Indian Journal of Medical Research 143, 348356.Google Scholar
33.Jadadish Mahanta, BB, Das, HK and Chelleng, PK (2009) The risk of HIV and HCV infection among injection drug users in northeast India. AIDS Care 21, 14201424.Google Scholar
34.Medhi, GK et al. (2011) Spatial distribution and characteristics of injecting drug users (IDU) in five Northeastern states of India. BMC Public Health 11, 111.Google Scholar
35.James, J (2016) Dealing with drug-seeking behaviour. Australian Prescriber 39, 96100.Google Scholar
36.Latkin, C et al. (2011) The relationship between social network factors, HIV, hepatitis C among injecting drug users in Chennai, India. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 117, 5054.Google Scholar
37.Sartor, R. (1991) The social impact of drug abuse on community life. Medicine and Law 10, 205208.Google Scholar
38.Hammett, TM et al. (2010) Female sexual partners of injection drug users in Vietnam: an at-risk population in urgent need of HIV prevention services. AIDS Care 22, 14661472.Google Scholar
39.Beyrer, C et al. (2000) Overland heroin trafficking routes and HIV-1 spread in south and South East Asia. AIDS (London, England) 14, 7583.Google Scholar
40.Sharma, AL et al. (2018) Antiretroviral resistance, genotypic characterization and origin of Human Immunodeficiency Virus among the infected wives of Intravenous drug users in Manipur. Scientific Reports 8, 1.Google Scholar
41.Mahajan, AP et al. (2008) Stigma in the HIV/AIDS epidemic: a review of the literature and recommendations for the way forward. AIDS (London, England) 22, S67S79.Google Scholar
42.Tarakeshwar, N et al. (2006) Living with HIV infection: perceptions of patients with access to care at a non-governmental organization in Chennai, India. Culture Health & Sexuality 8, 407421.Google Scholar
43.Ahmedani, BK (2011) Mental health stigma: society, individuals, and the profession. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics 8, 41416.Google Scholar
44.Valenzuela, C et al. (2015) HIV stigma as a barrier to retention in HIV care at a general hospital in Lima, Peru: a case-control study. AIDS Behaviour 19, 235245.Google Scholar
45.McConnell, MJ et al. (2008) Molecular epidemiology of HIV type 1 in newly diagnosed patients in southern Spain. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses 24, 881887.Google Scholar
46.Seth, P (2010) Evolution of HIV-1 in India. Indian Journal of Virology 21, 37.Google Scholar
47.Arts, EJ and Hazuda, DJ (2012) HIV-1 antiretroviral drug therapy. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 2, 121.Google Scholar
48.Shafer, RW and Schapiro, JM (2008) HIV-1 drug resistance mutations: an updated framework for the second decade of HAART. AIDS Review 10, 6784.Google Scholar
49.Manns, MP et al. (2017) Hepatitis C virus infection. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 3, 17006.Google Scholar
50.Lee, W and Dieterich, D (2004) Challenges in the management of HIV and hepatitis C virus co-infection. Drugs 64, 693700.Google Scholar
51.Yang, R et al. (2014) Impact of hepatitis B virus infection on HIV response to antiretroviral therapy in a Chinese antiretroviral therapy center. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 28, 2934.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. A flow chart showing the process of articles selection for this review.

Figure 1

Table 1. Molecular epidemiology of HIV/AIDS in Manipur, North-east India: articles published since a decade and identified within the review

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Pictorial representation of factors which influence high HIV/AIDS.

Figure 3

Table 2. Fact files of HIV/AIDS in Manipur