Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:41:47.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vaccination against influenza: a five-year study in the Post Office

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. W. G. Smith  and
R. Pollard
J. W. G. Smith
Affiliation:
Epidemiological Research Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT
R. Pollard
Affiliation:
Epidemiological Research Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An injection of influenza vaccine was offered to approximately 60 000 Postal and Telecommunications staff at the beginning of five successive winters. The sickness absence of this group, which included those who accepted the offer of vaccine as well as those who did not, was compared throughout the winter with that of a similar number of employees who were not offered vaccine. The two groups, ‘vaccinated’ and control, comprised the staff of nearly 400 Post Office units scattered throughout Great Britain, the units of the two groups being matched as far as practicable for numbers employed, type of work, region and type of location.

The proportion who accepted vaccine fell from 42% in the first year (when only 26 000 Telecommunications employees were offered vaccine) to 35% in the second year, and 25% by the fifth year.

With the exception of Telecommunications employees in 1972–73, the sickness absence rate of the group offered vaccine was less than that of the group not offered vaccine, and the difference was evident during the winter observation periods both when influenza was prevalent and when it was not. In the last four years of the study the average difference in sickness absence between the ‘vaccinated’ and control groups was 1.26 days per 100 employees per week during and 1.12 days outside the influenza periods. Moreover, the difference during the influenza periods was greater than could be expected from the acceptance rate of vaccine and the estimated attack rate of influenza. The apparent reduction in sickness absence of the group offered vaccine in comparison with the groupnot offered vaccine represented an appreciable saving in cost.

It is suggested than an annual influenza vaccination campaign in industry may produce financial benefit, but that only a proportion of the benefit is due to an improvement in health.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 83 , Issue 1 , August 1979 , pp. 157 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

References

Edmondson, K. W., Graham, D. S. M. & Warburton, M. F. (1970). A clinical trial of influenza vaccine in Canberra. Medical Journal of Australia 2, 6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (1976). 25, 416.Google Scholar
Pereira, M. S., Chakraverty, P., Schild, G. C., Coleman, M. T. and Dowdle, W. R. (1972). Prevalence of antibody to current influenza viruses andeffect of vaccination on antibody response. British Medical Journal, 4, 701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, P. M. & Tobin, J. O'H. (1973). Viral and epidemiological findings in MRC–PHLS surveys of respiratory disease in hospital and general practice. Postgraduate Medical Journal 49, 478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Report, (1977). Influenza surveillance 1972–75. Public Health Laboratory Service Standing Advisory Committee on Influenza. Journal of Hygiene 78, 223.Google Scholar
Roethlisberger, F. J. & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the Worker. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ruben, F. L. (1973). Effectiveness of current killed influenza vaccines against influenza A/England/42/72. Journal of Infectious Diseases 127, 576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, J. W. G. (1974). Vaccination in the control of influenza. Lancet ii, 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. W. G., Pollard, R., Fletcher, W. B., Barker, R. & Lewis, J. R. (1974). Influenza vaccination – acceptance in an industrial population. British Journal of Industrial Medicine 31, 292.Google Scholar
Smith, J. W. G., Fletcher, W. B. & Wherry, P. J. (1975). Reactions to injected influenza vaccine. Developments in Biological Standardisation 28, 377.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, J. W. G., Fletcher, W. B. & Wherry, P. J. (1976). Vaccination in the control of influenza. Postgraduate Medical Journal 52, 399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, P. J. (1974). Sickness absence: facts and misconceptions. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians 8, 315.Google ScholarPubMed