Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message

Login Alert

Cancel
Log in
×
×
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Cited by
  • Crossref logo 14
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Piccolo, Lidia Del Benpensanti, Maria Grazia Bonini, Piero Cellerino, Paola Saltini, Anna and Zimmermann, Christa 1999. The Verona-Medical Interview Classification System/Patient (VR-MICS/P). The instrument and its reliability. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 56.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Del Piccolo, Lidia 2000. Psycho-social problem disclosure during primary care consultation. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, Vol. 9, Issue. 4, p. 257.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Piccolo, Lidia Del Mazzi, Mariangela Saltini, Anna and Zimmermann, Christa 2002. Inter and intra individual variations in physicians’ verbal behaviour during primary care consultations. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 55, Issue. 10, p. 1871.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Rimondini, Michela and Del Piccolo, Lidia 2002. Patient centered approach from general practice to psychiatry. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, Vol. 11, Issue. 4, p. 232.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Cushing, Annie 2002. International Handbook of Research in Medical Education. Vol. 7, Issue. , p. 711.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Christa Piccolo, Lidia Del and Mazzi, Maria Angela 2003. Patient cues and medical interviewing in general practice: examples of the application of sequential analysis. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, Vol. 12, Issue. 2, p. 115.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Heaven, Cathy Maguire, Peter and Green, Claire 2003. A patient-centred approach to defining and assessing interviewing competency. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, Vol. 12, Issue. 2, p. 86.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Del Piccolo, Lidia Putnam, Samuel M Mazzi, Maria Angela and Zimmermann, Christa 2004. The biopsychosocial domains and the functions of the medical interview in primary care: construct validity of the Verona Medical Interview Classification System. Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 53, Issue. 1, p. 47.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Wynn, Rolf 2005. Empathy in general practice consultations: A qualitative analysis. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, Vol. 14, Issue. 3, p. 163.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Goss, Claudia Mazzi, Maria A. Piccolo, Lidia Del Rimondini, Michela and Zimmermann, Christa 2005. Information‐giving sequences in general practice consultations. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 11, Issue. 4, p. 339.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Piccolo, Lidia Del Mead, Nicola Gask, Linda Mazzi, Maria Angela Goss, Claudia Rimondini, Michela and Zimmermann, Christa 2005. The English version of the Verona medical interview classification system (VR-MICS). Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 58, Issue. 3, p. 252.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Del Piccolo, Lidia Mazzi, Maria Angela Dunn, Graham Sandri, Marco and Zimmermann, Christa 2007. Sequence analysis in multilevel models. A study on different sources of patient cues in medical consultations. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 65, Issue. 11, p. 2357.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Li, Han Z. Del Piccolo, Lidia Angela Mazzi, Maria Scardoni, Silvia Gobbi, Martina and Zimmermann, Christa 2008. A theory‐based proposal to evaluate patient‐centred communication in medical consultations. Health Education, Vol. 108, Issue. 5, p. 355.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Rey Velasco, Elena Pedersen, Hanne Sæderup Laursen, Ditte Hjorth and Skinner, Timothy 2023. A meta-narrative review of coding tools for healthcare interactions and their applicability to written communication. PEC Innovation, Vol. 3, Issue. , p. 100211.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
Cambridge University Press

Our Site

  • Accessibility
  • Contact & Help
  • Legal Notices

Our Platforms

  • Cambridge Core
  • Cambridge Open Engage
  • Cambridge Higher Education

Our Products

  • Journals
  • Books
  • Elements
  • Textbooks
  • Courseware

Join us online

Please choose a valid location.

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2025

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

An instrument for evaluating medical interview in general practice: the VR-MICS/D (Verona-Medical Interview Classification System/Doctor)
  • Volume 7, Issue 3
  • Anna Saltini (a1), Davide Cappellari (a1), Paola Cellerino (a1), Lidia Del Piccolo (a1) and Christa Zimmermann (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1121189X00007405
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

An instrument for evaluating medical interview in general practice: the VR-MICS/D (Verona-Medical Interview Classification System/Doctor)
  • Volume 7, Issue 3
  • Anna Saltini (a1), Davide Cappellari (a1), Paola Cellerino (a1), Lidia Del Piccolo (a1) and Christa Zimmermann (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1121189X00007405
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

An instrument for evaluating medical interview in general practice: the VR-MICS/D (Verona-Medical Interview Classification System/Doctor)
  • Volume 7, Issue 3
  • Anna Saltini (a1), Davide Cappellari (a1), Paola Cellerino (a1), Lidia Del Piccolo (a1) and Christa Zimmermann (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1121189X00007405
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.
You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.