Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zklqj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T18:14:28.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

KNOWING HOW TO PUT KNOWLEDGE FIRST IN THE THEORY OF JUSTIFICATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2016

Paul Silva Jr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In what follows I offer a novel knowledge-first account of justification that avoids the pitfalls of existing accounts while preserving the underlying insight of knowledge-first epistemologies: that knowledge comes first. The view is, roughly, this: justification is grounded in our practical knowledge (know-how) concerning the acquisition of propositional knowledge (knowledge-that). The upshot is a virtue-theoretic, knowledge-first view of justification that is internalist-friendly and able to explain more facts about justification than any other available view.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Episteme , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 393 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bengson, J. and Moffett, M. 2011. ‘Non-propositional Intellectualism.’ In Bengson, J. and Moffett, M. (eds), Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind and Action, pp. 161–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bird, A. 2007. ‘Justified Judging.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 74: 81–110.Google Scholar
Carter, J. A. and Pritchard, D. Forthcoming. ‘Knowledge-How and Epistemic Luck.” Noûs.Google Scholar
Cath, Y. 2011. ‘Knowing How Without Knowing That.’ In Bengson, J. and Moffett, M. (eds), Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. 2002. ‘Basic Knowledge and the Problem of Easy Knowledge.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65: 309–29.Google Scholar
Comesana, J. and Kantin, H. 2010. ‘Is Evidence Knowledge?’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 89: 447–55.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. 2014. ‘Justification is Internal,’ In Steup, M., Turri, J. and Sosa, E. (eds), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (Second Edition). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Greco, J. 2010. Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greco, J. 2012. ‘A (Different) Virtue Epistemology.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85: 1–26.Google Scholar
Hawley, K. 2003. ‘Success and Knowledge-How.’ American Philosophical Quarterly, 40: 19–31.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, J. 2014. ‘Justification is Potential Knowledge.’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 44: 184–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichikawa, J. and Steup, M. 2012. ‘The Analysis of Knowledge,’ In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/Win2012/entries/knowledge-analysis/.Google Scholar
Kelp, C. Forthcoming. ‘Knowledge First Virtue Epistemology.’ In Carter, A., Gordon, E. and Jarvis, B. (eds), Knowledge First: Approaches in Epistemology and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Korcz, K. 2010. ‘The Epistemic Basing Relation.’ In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/basing-epistemic/.Google Scholar
Littlejohn, C. 2012. Justification and the Truth-Connection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlejohn, C. Forthcoming. ‘Plea for Epistemic Excuses.’ In Dorsch, F. and Dutant, J. (eds), The New Evil Demon Problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McGlynn, A. 2012. ‘Justification as ‘Would-Be’ Knowledge.’ Episteme, 9: 361–76.Google Scholar
McGlynn, A. 2014. Knowledge First? London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Millar, A. 2008. ‘Perceptual-recognitional abilities and perceptual knowledge.’ In Haddock, A. and Macpherson, F. (eds), Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miracchi, L. 2015. ‘Competence to Know.’ Philosophical Studies, 172: 29–56.Google Scholar
Neta, R. and Pritchard, D. 2007. ‘McDowell and the New Evil Genius.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 74: 381–96.Google Scholar
Poston, T. 2009. ‘Know-How to be Gettiered?’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79: 743–47.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D., Millar, A. and Haddock, A. 2010. The Nature and Value of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pryor, J. 2000. ‘The Skeptic and the Dogmatist.’ Noûs, 34: 517–49.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. 2013. ‘Justification as the Appearance of Knowledge.’ Philosophical Studies, 163: 367–83.Google Scholar
Silins, N. 2008. ‘Basic Justification and the Moorean Response to the Skeptic.’ In Gendler, T. S. and Hawthorne, J., Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silva, P. 2013. ‘How To Be Conservative: A Partial Defense of Epistemic Conservatism.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 91: 501–14.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. 2007. A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. 2011. Know How. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. 2005. ‘Stick to What You Know.’ Noûs, 39: 359–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turri, J. 2010. ‘On the Relationship Between Propositional and Doxastic Justification.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 80: 312–26.Google Scholar
Turri, J. 2011. ‘Believing for a Reason.’ Erkenntnis, 74: 383–97.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, R. 2002. ‘Internalism Explained.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65: 349–69.Google Scholar
White, R. 2006. ‘Problems for Dogmatism.’ Philosophical Studies, 131: 525–57.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N. 2008. ‘Propositional Knowledge and Know-How.’ Synthese, 165: 107–25.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 2014. ‘Knowledge First.’ In Steup, M., Turri, J. and Sosa, E. (eds), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, Second Edition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. Forthcoming. ‘Justifications, Excuses, and Sceptical Scenarios.’ In Dutant, J. and Dorsch, F. (eds), The New Evil Demon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 2004. ‘Warrant for Nothing (and Foundations for Free)?’ Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 78: 167–212.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, L. 1996. Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry Into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar