Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:46:43.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY AND HIGHER-ORDER EVIDENCE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2018

Adam Green
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Appeals to “being on the right side of history” or accusations of being on the wrong side of history are increasingly common on social media, in the media proper, and in the rhetoric of politics. One might well wonder, though, what the value is of invoking history in this manner. Is declaring who is on what side of history merely dramatic shorthand for one's being right and one's opponents wrong? Or is there something more to it than that? In this paper, I argue that an appeal to being on the right side of history is best construed as an invocation of higher-order evidence. I do not deny that there are purely rhetorical, non-evidential uses of the right and wrong side of history, but the phrase can be construed in a more substantive manner. I use work on virtual epistemic elections to model these appeals to history. Zeroing in on the kind of higher-order evidence invoked helps us clarify the criterion for better or worse, more or less convincing appeals to it.

Type
Article
Information
Episteme , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 1 - 15
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, D. 2018. ‘The Wrongness of “The Right Side of History.”’ Prospect Magazine, https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/the-wrongness-of-the-right-side-of-history.Google Scholar
Avnur, Y. and Scott-Kakures, D. 2015. ‘How Irrelevant Influences Bias Belief.’ Philosophical Perspectives, 29: 7–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. 2013. ‘George W. Bush on Leno: History Will Judge My Decisions in Office.’ NBC News, https://www.nbcnews.com/news/other/george-w-bush-leno-history-will-judge-my-decisions-office-f2D11627621.Google Scholar
Carey, B. and Matheson, J. 2013. ‘How Skeptical is the Equal Weight View?’ In Machuca, D. (ed.), Disagreement and Skepticism, pp. 131–49. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Christensen, D. 2007. ‘Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.’ Philosophical Review, 116: 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, D. 2010. ‘Higher-Order Evidence.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81: 185–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiPaolo, J. and Simpson, R. M. 2016. ‘Indoctrination Anxiety and the Etiology of Belief.’ Synthese, 193: 3079–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elga, A. 2007. ‘Reflection and Disagreement.’ Noûs, 41: 478–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R. 2014. ‘Evidence of Evidence is Evidence.’ In Matheson, J. and Vitz, R. (eds), The Ethics of Belief, pp. 284–300. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitelson, B. 2012. ‘Evidence of Evidence is Not (Necessarily) Evidence.’ Analysis, 72: 85–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, J. 1987. ‘Massive IQ Gains in 14 Nations: What IQ Tests Really Measure.’ Psychological Bulletin, 101: 171–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, J. 2014. ‘The Pathetic “Wrong Side of History” Plea.’ New York Post, https://nypost.com/2014/03/21/the-pathetic-wrong-side-of-history-plea/.Google Scholar
Graham, D. 2015. ‘The Wrong Side of the “Right Side of History.”’ The Atlantic, https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/12/obama-right-side-of-history/420462/.Google Scholar
Keen, J. 2013. ‘George W. Bush Says Library “A Place to Lay Out the Facts.”’ USA Today, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/21/george-w-bush-interview-library/2099093/.Google Scholar
King, J. 2013. ‘Bush 43: History Will Judge Me … I'm a Content Man.’ CNN.com, http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/24/politics/bush-interview-king/index.html.Google Scholar
King, N. 2012. ‘Disagreement: What's the Problem or a Good Peer is Hard to Find.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85: 249–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 1981. After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Matheson, J. 2014. ‘Disagreement: Idealized and Everyday.’ In Matheson, J. and Vitz, R. (eds), The Ethics of Belief, pp. 315–30. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, W. 2002. Orality and Literacy. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pittard, J. 2018. ‘Fundamental Disagreements and the Limits of Instrumentalism.’ Synthese, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1691-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, A. 2017. ‘The Danger of Knowing You're on the “Right Side of History.”’ New York Magazine, http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/11/the-danger-of-knowing-youre-on-the-right-side-of-history.html.Google Scholar
Tal, E. and Comesana, J. 2017. ‘Is Evidence of Evidence Evidence?’ Noûs, 51: 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vavova, K. 2014. ‘Moral Disagreement and Moral Skepticism.’ Philosophical Perspectives, 28: 302–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vavova, K. 2018. ‘Irrelevant Influences.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 96: 134–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washington, B. T. 1996. Up From Slavery. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar