Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T10:52:13.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hausdorff dimension of Dirichlet non-improvable set versus well-approximable set

Part of: Diophantine approximation, transcendental number theory Probabilistic theory: distribution modulo $1$; metric theory of algorithms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2022

BIXUAN LI ,
BAOWEI WANG  and
JIAN XU
BIXUAN LI*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China (e-mail: bwei_wang@hust.edu.cn, xujian@hust.edu.cn)
BAOWEI WANG
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China (e-mail: bwei_wang@hust.edu.cn, xujian@hust.edu.cn)
JIAN XU
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China (e-mail: bwei_wang@hust.edu.cn, xujian@hust.edu.cn)
*
e-mail: math_forever@163.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dirichlet’s theorem, including the uniform setting and asymptotic setting, is one of the most fundamental results in Diophantine approximation. The improvement of the asymptotic setting leads to the well-approximable set (in words of continued fractions)

$$ \begin{align*} \mathcal{K}(\Phi):=\{x:a_{n+1}(x)\ge\Phi(q_{n}(x))\ \textrm{for infinitely many }n\in \mathbb{N}\}; \end{align*} $$
the improvement of the uniform setting leads to the Dirichlet non-improvable set
$$ \begin{align*} \mathcal{G}(\Phi):=\{x:a_{n}(x)a_{n+1}(x)\ge\Phi(q_{n}(x))\ \textrm{for infinitely many }n\in \mathbb{N}\}. \end{align*} $$
Surprisingly, as a proper subset of Dirichlet non-improvable set, the well-approximable set has the same s-Hausdorff measure as the Dirichlet non-improvable set. Nevertheless, one can imagine that these two sets should be very different from each other. Therefore, this paper is aimed at a detailed analysis on how the growth speed of the product of two-termed partial quotients affects the Hausdorff dimension compared with that of single-termed partial quotients. More precisely, let $\Phi _{1},\Phi _{2}:[1,+\infty )\rightarrow \mathbb {R}^{+}$ be two non-decreasing positive functions. We focus on the Hausdorff dimension of the set $\mathcal {G}(\Phi _{1})\!\setminus\! \mathcal {K}(\Phi _{2})$ . It is known that the dimensions of $\mathcal {G}(\Phi )$ and $\mathcal {K}(\Phi )$ depend only on the growth exponent of $\Phi $ . However, rather different from the current knowledge, it will be seen in some cases that the dimension of $\mathcal {G}(\Phi _{1})\!\setminus\! \mathcal {K}(\Phi _{2})$ will change greatly even slightly modifying $\Phi _1$ by a constant.

Keywords

Dirichlet improvable setwell-approximable setcontinued fractionsHausdorff dimension

MSC classification

Primary: 11K50: Metric theory of continued fractions
Secondary: 11K55: Metric theory of other algorithms and expansions; measure and Hausdorff dimension 11J83: Metric theory
Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 43 , Issue 8 , August 2023 , pp. 2707 - 2731
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakhtawar, A., Bos, P. and Hussain, M.. The sets of Dirichlet non-improvable numbers versus well-approximable numbers. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 40(12) (2020), 3217–3235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beresnevich, V. and Velani, S.. A mass transference principle and the Duffin–Schaeffer conjecture for Hausdorff measures. Ann. of Math. (2) 164(3) (2006), 971–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugeaud, Y., Cheung, Y. and Chevallier, N.. Hausdorff dimension and uniform exponents in dimension two. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 167(2) (2019), 249–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, H. and Schmidt, W.. Dirichlet’s theorem on diophantine approximation. Symposia Mathematica, Volume IV (INDAM, Rome, 1968/69). Academic Press, London, 1970, pp. 113–132.Google Scholar
Falconer, K.. Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1990.Google Scholar
Good, I. J.. The fractional dimensional theory of continued fractions. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 37 (1941), 199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussian, M., Kleinbock, D., Wadleigh, N. and Wang, B.. Hausdorff measure of sets of Dirichlet non-improvable numbers. Mathematika 64(2) (2018), 502–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iosifescu, M. and Kraaikamp, C.. Metrical Theory of Continued Fractions (Mathematics and Its Applications, 547). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarník, I.. Zur metrischen Theorie der diopahantischen Approximationen. Proc. Mat. Fyz. 36 (1928), 91–106.Google Scholar
Khintchine, A. Y.. Einige Sätze über Kettenbrüche, mit Anwendungen auf die Theorie der Diophantischen Approximationen. Math. Ann. 92(1–2) (1924), 115–125 (in German).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khintchine, A. Y.. Continued Fractions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago–London, 1964.Google Scholar
Kim, D. and Liao, L.. Dirichlet uniformly well-approximated numbers. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2019(24) (2019), 7691–7732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinbock, D. and Wadleigh, N.. A zero-one law for improvements to Dirichlet’s theorem. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 146(5) (2018), 1833–1844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinbock, D. and Wadleigh, N.. An inhomogeneous Dirichlet theorem via shrinking targets. Compos. Math. 155(7) (2019), 1402–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koukoulopoulos, D. and Maynard, J.. On the Duffin–Schaeffer conjecture. Ann. of Math. (2) 192(1) (2020), 251–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauldin, D. and Urbański, M.. Dimensions and measures in infinite iterated function systems. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 73(1996), 105–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauldin, D. and Urbański, M.. Graph Directed Markov Systems: Geometry and Dynamics of Limit Sets (Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 148). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, W.. On badly approximable numbers and certain games. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 123 (1966), 178–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, W.. Diophantine Approximation (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 785). Springer, Berlin, 1980, x+299 pp.Google Scholar
Sprindzuk, V. G.. Metric Theory of Diophantine Approximations. Winston & Sons, Washington, DC; John Wiley & Sons, New York–Toronto, Ontario–London, 1979.Google Scholar
Wang, B. and Wu, J.. Hausdorff dimension of certain sets arising in continued fraction expansions. Adv. Math. 218(5) (2008), 1319–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, B., Wu, J. and Xu, J.. A generalization of the Jarník–Besicovitch theorem by continued fractions. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 36(4) (2016), 1278–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar