Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T06:53:58.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The structure of tame minimal dynamical systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

ELI GLASNER
ELI GLASNER*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (email: glasner@math.tau.ac.il)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A dynamical version of the Bourgain–Fremlin–Talagrand dichotomy shows that the enveloping semigroup of a dynamical system is either very large and contains a topological copy of , or it is a ‘tame’ topological space whose topology is determined by the convergence of sequences. In the latter case, the dynamical system is said to be tame. We use the structure theory of minimal dynamical systems to show that, when the acting group is Abelian, a tame metric minimal dynamical system (i) is almost automorphic (i.e. it is an almost one-to-one extension of an equicontinuous system), and (ii) admits a unique invariant probability measure such that the corresponding measure-preserving system is measure-theoretically isomorphic to the Haar measure system on the maximal equicontinuous factor.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 27 , Issue 6 , December 2007 , pp. 1819 - 1837
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1]Auslander, J.. Minimal Flows and their Extensions (Mathematics Studies, 153). Notas de Matemática, Amsterdam, 1988.Google Scholar
[2]Bourgain, J., Fremlin, D. H. and Talagrand, M.. Pointwise compact sets of Baire-measurable functions. Amer. J. Math. 100 (1978), 845–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bronstein, I. U.. A characteristic property of PD-extensions. Bul. Akad. Stiimce RSS Moldoven 3 (1977), 11–15 (in Russian).Google Scholar
[4]Ditor, S. Z. and Eifler, L. Q.. Some open mapping theorems for measures. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 164 (1972), 287–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Ellis, R.. A semigroup associated with a transformation group. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 94 (1960), 272–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Ellis, R.. Lectures on Topological Dynamics. W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
[7]Ellis, R., Glasner, E. and Shapiro, L.. Proximal-isometric flows. Adv. Math. 17 (1975), 213–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Furstenberg, H.. The structure of distal flows. Amer. J. Math. 85 (1963), 477–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Glasner, E.. Relatively invariant measures. Pacific J. Math. 58 (1975), 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Glasner, E.. Proximal Flows (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 517). Springer, Berlin, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Glasner, E.. Distal and semisimple affine flows. Amer. J. Math. 109 (1987), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Glasner, E.. Structure theory as a tool in topological dynamics. Descriptive Set Theory and Dynamical Systems (LMS Lecture Note Series, 277). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, pp. 173–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Glasner, E.. On tame dynamical systems. Colloq. Math. 105 (2006), 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Glasner, E. and Megrelishvili, M.. Hereditarily non-sensitive dynamical systems and linear representations. Colloq. Math. 104(2) (2006), 223–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Glasner, E., Megrelishvili, M. and Uspenskij, V. V.. On metrizable enveloping semigroups. Israel J. Math. To appear. ArXiv math.DS/0606373.Google Scholar
[16]Huang, W.. Tame systems and scrambled pairs under an abelian group action. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 26 (2006), 1549–1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Huang, W., Li, S. M., Shao, S. and Ye, X.. Null systems and sequence entropy pairs. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 23 (2003), 1505–1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Kerr, D. and Li, H.. Independence in topological and C *-dynamics. Math. Ann. To appear.Google Scholar
[19]Köhler, A.. Enveloping semigroups for flows. Proc. R. Irish Academy 95A (1995), 179–191.Google Scholar
[20]McMahon, D. C.. Weak mixing and a note on the structure theorem for minimal transformation groups. Illinois J. Math. 20 (1976), 186–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Veech, W. A.. Topological dynamics. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 83 (1977), 775–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]de Vries, J.. Elements of Topological Dynamics. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]van der Woude, J.. Characterizations of H(PI) extensions. Pacific J. Math. 120 (1985), 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar