Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:10:56.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Regional Path to Peaceful Change: What the Asian and European Experiences Tell Us

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2020

Mark Beeson Open the ORCID record for Mark Beeson [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the more striking, surprising, and optimism-inducing features of the contemporary international system has been the decline of interstate war. The key question for students of international relations and comparative politics is how this happy state of affairs came about. In short, was this a universal phenomenon or did some regions play a more important and pioneering role in bringing about peaceful change? As part of the roundtable “International Institutions and Peaceful Change,” this essay suggests that Western Europe generally and the European Union in particular played pivotal roles in transforming the international system and the behavior of policymakers. This helped to create the material and ideational conditions in which other parts of the world could replicate this experience, making war less likely and peaceful change more feasible. This argument is developed by comparing the experiences of the EU and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and their respective institutional offshoots. The essay uses this comparative historical analysis to assess both regions’ capacity to cope with new security challenges, particularly the declining confidence in institutionalized cooperation.

Keywords

European UnionEast AsiaAssociation of Southeast Asian Nationsregionspeaceful change
Type
Roundtable: International Institutions and Peaceful Change
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , Winter 2020 , pp. 535 - 545
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Pinker, Stephen, The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined (New York: Viking, 2012)Google Scholar.

2 Allison, Graham, Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides's Trap? (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017)Google Scholar.

3 Beeson, Mark “Asia's Competing Multilateral Initiatives: Quality versus Quantity,” Pacific Review 32, no. 2 (2019), pp. 245–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 John E. Mueller, Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War (New York: Basic Books, 1989).

5 Stephen A. Marglin and Juliet B. Schor, eds., The Golden Age of Capitalism: Reinterpreting the Postwar Experience (Oxford: Clarendon, 1990).

6 Alan S. Milward, The Reconstruction of Western Europe, 1945–51 (London: Routledge, 1984).

7 Geir Lundestad, “Empire by Invitation? The United States and Western Europe, 1945–1952,” Journal of Peace Research 23, no. 3 (September 1986), pp. 263–77.

8 Anders Wivel and Ole Wæver, “The Power of Peaceful Change: The Crisis of the European Union and the Rebalancing of Europe's Regional Order,” International Studies Review 20, no. 2 (June 2018), pp. 318–25, at p. 320.

9 Julian E. Barnes and Helene Cooper, “Trump Discussed Pulling U.S. from NATO, Aides Say amid New Concerns over Russia,” New York Times, January 14, 2019.

10 G. John Ikenberry, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University, 2001).

11 “The Covid-19 Pandemic Puts Pressure on the EU,” Economist, May 14, 2020.

12 Andrew Moravcsik, The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2013).

13 Stephen Erlanger, “The Messier Brexit Gets, the Better Europe Looks,” New York Times, January 30, 2019.

14 Mark Beeson, Regionalism and Globalization in East Asia: Politics, Security and Economic Development, 2nd ed. (Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave, 2014).

15 Mark Beeson and Richard Higgott, “Hegemony, Institutionalism and US Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice in Comparative Historical Perspective,” Third World Quarterly 26, no. 7 (October 2005), pp. 1173–88.

16 Richard Stubbs, “War and Economic Development: Expert-Oriented Industrialization in East and Southeast Asia,” Comparative Politics 31, no. 3 (1999), pp. 337–55.

17 Sebastian Heilmann and Lea Shih, “The Rise of Industrial Policy in China, 1978–2012” (Harvard Yenching Institute Working Paper Series, University of Trier, 2013), www.harvard-yenching.org/wp-content/uploads/legacy_files/featurefiles/Sebastian%20Heilmann%20and%20Lea%20Shih_The%20Rise%20of%20Industrial%20Policy%20in%20China%201978-2012.pdf.

18 Mark Beeson, “Geopolitics and the Making of Regions: The Fall and Rise of East Asia,” Political Studies 57, no. 3 (October 2009), pp. 498–516.

19 Kenneth B. Pyle, Japan Rising: The Resurgence of Japanese Power and Purpose (New York: PublicAffairs, 2007).

20 Richard Rosecrance, The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World (New York: Basic Books, 1986).

21 Mark Beeson and Diane Stone, “The European Union Model's Influence in Asia after the Global Financial Crisis,” European Journal of East Asian Studies 12, no. 2 (January 2013), pp. 167–90.

22 Parenti, Christian, Tropic of Chaos: Climate Change and the New Geography of Violence (New York: Nation Books, 2011)Google Scholar.

23 Bellamy, Alex J., World Peace (and How We Can Achieve It) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019)Google Scholar.

24 Burns, Charlotte, Eckersley, Peter, and Tobin, Paul, “EU Environmental Policy in Times of Crisis,” Journal of European Public Policy 27, no. 1 (2020), pp. 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Kevin Rudd, “The Coming Post-COVID Anarchy: The Pandemic Bodes Ill for Both American and Chinese Power—and for the Global Order,” Foreign Affairs, May 6, 2020.