Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:08:10.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Guest Editorial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2012

Colin Scott
Affiliation:
Colin Scott, Professor of EU regulation and Governance and Dean of Law, University College Dublin
John Biggins
Affiliation:
John Biggins BA (hons), Dublin City University, LLM, Trinity College Dublin.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Much ink has been spilt in discussing the extent to which risks generated by over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives were implicated in the global financial crisis (GFC). Subsequent inquiries into the causes of the crisis have focused on, amongst other things, the substantial exemption of these financial instruments from regulatory oversight and an apparent lack of awareness amongst both market actors and regulators about the extent of risk involved. Following the GFC, a narrative has now emerged in both the United States and the European Union which emphasises the significance of systemic risk, comprising the aggregate consequences arising from failure of transactions as opposed to the risk associated with particular transactions. To address systemic risk, new regimes focus both on increasing the transparency of OTC derivatives transactions and on the imposition of new regulatory requirements.

Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press and the Authors 2012