Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:54:00.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relationship between Competition Authorities and Sector-Specific Regulators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Wernhard Möschel
Wernhard Möschel
Affiliation:
Full Professor of Law/University of Tuebingen, Germany (since 1973), Chairman of the Advisory Committee at the Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology in Berlin, between 1989 and 2000 Member of the German Monopolies Commission, from 1998 to 2000 as Chairman.
Get access

Extract

The article is divided into three parts:

— the present situation,

— the theoretically possible solutions,

— a weighing of pros and cons, guided by a standard of regulatory efficiency.

Type
Articles
Information
European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 2002 , pp. 823 - 831
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press and the Authors 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cf. the survey in Monopolkommission, , Hauptgutachten 1988/1989, Wettbewerbspolitik vorneuen Herausforderungen (Baden-Baden: Nomos 1990), chap. VIII, pp. 387–411.Google Scholar

2 Case C-309/99 J. C. J. Wouters et al. v. Algemene Raad van de Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten, 55 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (2002) 877 et seq.; Case C-35/99 Manuele Arduino, 55 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (2002) 882 et seq.

3 Excellent survey of the various regulatory patterns in OECD, “The Relationship between Competition and Regulatory Authorities”, 1(3) OECD Journal of Competition Law & Policy (1999) 169–245Google Scholar; attempt of a conceptual founding in Bernhard, Duijm, “Wettbewerbssicherung nach Privatisierung und Deregulierung: Aufgabe allgemeiner Wettbewerbs- oder sektoraler Regulierungsbehörden”, in: Hartmut, Berg (ed.), Deregulierung und Privatisierung: Gewolltes Erreichtes – Versäumtes (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 2002) pp. 9–27.Google Scholar

4 Art. 7 (4) Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 (Framework Directive) OJ(EC) [2002] L 108/41.

5 Cf. Richard, Whish, Competition Law, 4th ed. (London: Butterworths 1999) at p. 357.Google Scholar

6 Cf. Wernhard, Möschel, “Die Unabhängigkeit des Bundeskartellamtes”, 48 Ordo (1997) 241–251.Google Scholar

7 Cf. OECD, supra n. 3, at p. 221.

8 Cf. Directive 2002/21/EC, supra n. 4, Art. 3 (2).

9 Fourth Protocol to the General Agreement on Trade in Services, Additional Commitment by the European Communities and their Member States, Definitions No. 5 (Independent regulators), BGBl. 1997 II, no. 46 of 26.11.1997, p. 1990.

10 Cf. Wernhard, Möschel, “Die deutsche Fusionskontrolle auf dem Prüfstand des europäischen Rechts: ‘Überflügelung’ oder Harmonisierung”, 43 Die Aktiengesellschaft (1998) 561–566.Google Scholar

11 EC Commission, White Paper on the Modernisation of the Rules Implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the EC Treaty, OJ(EC) [1999] C 132, para. 78.Google Scholar

12 Cf. Proposal of Consumer Protection Against Price-Fixing Act of 1989, 101st Congr. 2d Sess. Senate Report 101–251, at p. 3 (reprinted in CCH TRR Suppl. No. 94 march 13, 1990); “Report of the American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law Task Force on the Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice”, 19 July 1989, 57 Antitrust & Trade Reg. Rep. Special Suppl. (no. 1425–1989) at p. 14.

13 Cf. Keith, Boyfield, The Politics of Regulation (London: European Policy Forum 2000) p. 38.Google Scholar