Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T00:31:06.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changing from a specialized surgical observation unit to an interdisciplinary surgical intensive care unit can reduce costs and increase the quality of treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2008

T. Volkert ,
F. Hinder ,
B. Ellger  and
H. Van Aken
T. Volkert
Affiliation:
University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Muenster
F. Hinder
Affiliation:
Hegau-Bodensee-Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Singen, Germany
B. Ellger
Affiliation:
University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Muenster
H. Van Aken*
Affiliation:
University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Muenster
*
Correspondence to: Hugo Van Aken, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital, D-48149 Muenster, Germany. E-mail: hva@uni-muenster.de; Tel: +49 251 834 7251; Fax: +49 251 88704
Get access

Summary

Background and objectives

In Germany there is considerable variability in the organizational forms of intensive-care medicine. We present economical data that arose during the reorganization of an intensive care unit with the implementation of the continuous presence of a trained intensivist. The unit was changed from an intensive-observational unit managed by four surgical departments without continuous presence of a trained intensivist to an interdisciplinary surgical intensive care unit managed by the Department of Anaesthesia in co-operation with the surgical departments with the continuous presence of trained intensivists.

Methods

Measurement of costs for personnel, medical equipment and external services, revenues, length of hospital stay and complications of cardiac surgical patients.

Results

Per year costs for personnel increased by approximately €240 000, while expenses for medical equipment were reduced by €245 000. In all, 466 hospital days were saved by the reduction in the length of hospital stay, providing capacity for 22 additional cardiac surgical cases. In addition, the presence of trained intensivists made it possible to provide care for more severely ill patients, which gained approximately 100 additional case-mix points and increased the hospital’s revenues by more than €300 000. Emergency readmission to the intensive care unit was reduced by 17%. The number of patients requiring renal replacement therapy and those developing non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia was substantially reduced.

Conclusion

In addition to the medical advantages, staffing the intensive care unit with trained intensivists 24 h a day was of appreciable economical benefit.

Keywords

COST AND COST ANALYSISECONOMICSCRITICAL CARE UNITSMANPOWERDIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 25 , Issue 5 , May 2008 , pp. 382 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © European Society of Anaesthesiology 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Burchardi H, Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI) [German Interdisciplinary Assosiation of Critical Care Medicine]. Results of the COSt-study, unpublished data.Google Scholar
2.Roeder, N, DRG Research Group, University of Münster. Anpassungsbedarf der Vergütung von Krankenhausleistungen für 2007: Gutachten im Auftrag der Deutschen Krankenhausgesellschaft [Required adjustments for reimbursement of hospital services, 2007: expert opinion commissioned by the German Hospital Association]. Berlin: Deutsche Krankenhausgesellschaft, 2006 [downloadable at: http://www.dkgev.de/dkgev.php/cat/9/title/Downloads].Google Scholar
3.German DRG Institute. Deutsche Kodierrichtlinien: Allgemeine und spezielle Kodierrichtlinien für die Verschlüsselung von Krankheiten und Prozeduren [German coding guidelines: general and specific coding guidelines for encoding diseases and procedures]. Berlin: Institut für das Entgeltsystem im Krankenhaus (InEK gGmbH), 2006 [downloadable at: http://www.g-drg.de/].Google Scholar
4.Fuchs, RJ, Berenholtz, SM, Dorman, T. Do intensivists in ICU improve outcome? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2005; 19 (1): 125–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Burchardi, H, Moerer, O. Twenty-four hour presence of physicians in the ICU. Crit Care 2001; 5: 131–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed