No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Possible underestimation of the relative incidence of anaphylactic reactions to benzylisoquinoline neuromuscular blocking agents
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 July 2005
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Correspondence
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2003 European Society of Anaesthesiology
References
Mertes PM, Laxenaire MC. Allergic reactions occurring during anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002; 19: 240–262.Google Scholar
Laxenaire MC. Drugs and other agents involved in anaphylactic shock occurring during anaesthesia. A French multicenter epidemiological inquiry. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1993; 12: 91–96.Google Scholar
Laxenaire MC. Substances responsible for peranesthetic anaphylactic shock. A third French multicenter study (1992–94). Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1996; 15: 1211–1218.Google Scholar
Laxenaire MC. Epidemiology of anesthetic anaphylactoid reactions. Fourth multicenter survey (July 1994–December 1996). Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1999; 18: 796–809.Google Scholar
Laxenaire MC, Mertes PM. Anaphylaxis during anaesthesia. Results of a two-year survey in France. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 549–558.Google Scholar
Laroche D, Bricard H, Laxenaire MC. Allergo-anesthesia consultation: not enough patients are tested after an anaphylactoid anesthetic incident. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1998; 17: 89–90.Google Scholar
Bryson HM, Faulds D. Cisatracurium besilate. A review of its pharmacology and clinical potential in anaesthetic practice. Drugs 1997; 53: 848–866.Google Scholar