Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:47:41.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Postoperative pain status after intraoperative systemic dexmedetomidine and epidural neostigmine in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

K. Kida
Affiliation:
Jikei University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo
N. Ohtani
Affiliation:
Tohoku University Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Sendai, Japan
K. Shoji
Affiliation:
Jikei University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo
Y. Yasui
Affiliation:
Jikei University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo
E. Masaki*
Affiliation:
Tohoku University Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Sendai, Japan
*
Correspondence to: Eiji Masaki, Department of Anesthesiology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryomachi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8574, Japan. E-mail: ejmasaki@mail.tains.tohoku.ac.jp; Tel: +81 22 717 7321; Fax: +81 22 717 7325
Get access

Summary

Background and objectives

To determine whether intraoperative systemic dexmedetomidine improves postoperative pain and interacts with epidural neostigmine to produce analgesic effects.

Methods

Sixty patients undergoing gynaecological surgery were randomly divided into four groups to receive epidural neostigmine and/or systemic dexmedetomidine: control (Group C), epidural neostigmine (Group N), systemic dexmedetomidine (Group D) and co-administered neostigmine and dexmedetomidine (Group ND). Epidural neostigmine (0.3 mg) was administered with 10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine before the induction of general anaesthesia. Systemic dexmedetomidine (loading dose of 1 μg kg−1 over 10 min followed by 0.4 μg kg−1 h−1) was infused after the induction of general anaesthesia and continued until the end of surgery. The pain status of patients was assessed using the visual analogue scale at 2, 4, 6, 24 and 72 h postoperatively.

Results

Intraoperative systemic dexmedetomidine alone did not reduce postoperative pain scores. However, co-administered neostigmine and dexmedetomidine significantly decreased scores at 24 and 72 h (Group C: 3.0 [1.0–5.8] and 2.0 [0.3–3.0]; Group N: 1.5 [0.3–3.4] and 0 [0–1.3]; Group D: 3.5 [0–5.0] and 0 [0–1.4]; and Group ND: 0 [0–1.0]* and 0 [0–0]; median [interquartile range] *P = 0.0031, P = 0.0045 compared with Group C).

Conclusions

The intraoperative systemic infusion of dexmedetomidine alone at doses causing sedation does not result in postoperative analgesic effects. However, the co-administration of systemic dexmedetomidine and epidural neostigmine at higher doses may be a useful method to improve postoperative pain although side-effects have to be evaluated.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © European Society of Anaesthesiology 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Ebert, TJ, Hall, JE, Barney, JA, Uhrich, TD, Colinco, MD. The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 382394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Jaakola, M-L, Salonen, M, Lehtinen, R, Scheininet, H. The analgesic action of dexmedetomidine – a novel α2-adrenoceptor agonist – in healthy volunteers. Pain 1991; 46: 281285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Idänpään-Heikkilä, JJ, Kalso, EA, Seppälä, T. Antinociceptive actions of dexmedetomidine and the kappa-opioid agonist U-50,488H against noxious thermal, mechanical and inflammatory stimuli. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1994; 271: 13061313.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Sabbe, MB, Penning, JP, Ozaki, GT, Yaksh, TL. Spinal and systemic action of the alpha 2 receptor agonist dexmedetomidine in dogs. Antinociception and carbon dioxide response. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 10571072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Angst, MS, Ramaswamy, B, Davies, MF, Maze, M. Comparative analgesic and mental effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine and alfentanil in humans. Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 744752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Cortinez, LI, Hsu, Y-W, Sum-Ping, ST et al. Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics. Part II: crossover comparison of the analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 10771083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Arain, SR, Ruehlow, RM, Uhrich, TD, Ebert, TJ. The efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus morphine for postoperative analgesia after major inpatient surgery. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 153158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Gurbet, A, Basagan-Mogol, E, Turker, G, Ugun, F, Kaya, N, Ozcan, B. Intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine reduces perioperative analgesic requirements. Can J Anesth 2006; 53: 646652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Chen, S-R, Eisenach, JC, McCaslin, PP, Pan, H-L. Synergistic effect between intrathecal non-NMDA antagonist and gabapentin on allodynia induced by spinal nerve ligation in rats. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 500506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Xu, X-J, Puke, MJC, Wiesenfeld-Hallin, Z. The depressive effect of intrathecal clonidine on the spinal flexor reflex is enhanced after sciatic nerve section in rats. Pain 1992; 51: 145151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Tan, P-H, Kuo, J-H, Liu, K, Hung, C-C, Tsai, T-C, Deng, T-Y. Efficacy of intrathecal neostigmine for the relief of postinguinal hemiorrhaphy pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44: 10561060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Lauretti, GR, de Oliveira, R, Reis, MP, Juliao, MC, Pereira, NL. Study of three different doses of epidural neostigmine coadministered with lidocaine postoperative analgesia. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 15341538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Hood, DD, Mallak, KA, Eisenach, JC, Tong, C. Interaction between intrathecal neostigmine and epidural clonidine in human volunteers. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 315325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Roelants, F, Lavand’homme, PM, Mercier-Fuzier, V. Epidural administration of neostigmine and clonidine to induce labor analgesia: evaluation of efficacy and local anesthetic-sparing effect. Anesthesiology 2005; 102: 12051210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Khan, ZP, Munday, IT, Jones, RM, Thornton, C, Mant, TG, Amin, D. Effects of dexmedetomidine on isoflurane requirements in healthy volunteers. 1: pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83: 372380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Aantaa, R, Jaakola, ML, Kallio, A, Kanto, J. Reduction of the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane by dexmedetomidine. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 10551060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Kaya, FN, Sahin, S, Owen, MD, Eisenach, JC. Epidural neostigmine produces analgesia but also sedation women after cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 381385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Ramsay, MA, Luterman, DL. Dexmedetomidine as a total intravenous anesthetic agent. Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 787790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Chia, YY, Chang, TH, Liu, K, Chang, HC, Ko, NH, Wang, YM. The efficacy of thoracic epidural neostigmine infusion after thoracotomy. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 201208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Roelants, F, Lavand’homme, PM. Epidural neostigmine combined with sufentanil provides balanced and selective analgesia in early labor. Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 439444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Wahlander, S, Frumento, RJ, Wagener, G et al. A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to epidural analgesia after thoracic surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2005; 19: 630635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Fairbanks, CA, Stone, LS, Kitto, KF, Ngyen, HO, Posthumus, IJ, Wilcox, GI. Alpha(2C)-adrenergic receptors mediate spinal analgesia and adrenergic-opioid synergy. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2002; 300: 282290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Hayashi, Y, Guo, T-Z, Maze, M. Hypnotic and analgesic effects of the alpha 2-adrenergic agonist dexmedetomidine in morphine-tolerant rats. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 606610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Roelants, F, Lavand’homme, PM. Epidural neostigmine combined with sufentanil provides balanced and selective analgesia in early labor. Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 439444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Almeida, RA, Lauretti, GR, Mattos, AL. Antinociceptive effect of low-dose intrathecal neostigmine combined with intrathecal morphine following gynecologic surgery. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 495498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Pither, CE, Emanuelsson, BM, Reventlid, H, Whitehead, E. A comparison of the dynamics and pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine 7.5 mg/mL with and without epinephrine used for epidural anaesthesia in urological surgery. Clin Drug Investig 2003; 24: 245253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Coskuner, I, Tekin, M, Kati, I, Yagmur, C, Elcicek, K. Effects of dexmedetomidine on the duration of anaesthesia and wakefulness in bupivacaine epidural block. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007; 24: 535540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Kirdemir, P, Özkoçak, I, Demir, T, Gögüş, N. Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of preemptive used epidural ketamine and neostigmine. J Clin Anesth 2000; 12: 543548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Naquib, M, Yaksh, TL. Antinociceptive effects of spinal cholinesterase inhibition and isobolographic analysis of the interaction with μ and α2 receptor systems. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 13381348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Ueda, M, Oyama, T, Kuraishi, Y, Akaike, A, Satoh, M. Alpha2-adrenoceptor-mediated inhibition of capsaicin-evoked release of glutamate from rat spinal dorsal horn slices. Neurosci Lett 1995; 188: 137139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Murata, K, Nakagawa, I, Kumeta, Y, Kitahara, LM, Collins, JG. Intrathecal clonidine suppresses noxiously evoked activity of spinal wide dynamic range neurons in cats. Anesth Analg 1989; 69: 185191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Klimscha, W, Tong, C, Eisenach, JC. Intrathecal alpha 2-adrenergic agonists stimulate acetylcholine and norepinephrine release from the spinal cord dorsal horn in sheep. An in vivo microdialysis study. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 110116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Ribeiro-da-Silva, A, Cuello, AC. Choline acetyltransferase-immunoreactive profiles are presynaptic to primary sensory fibers in the rat superficial dorsal horn. J Comp Neurol 1990; 295: 370384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Travagli, RA. Muscarine receptor activation in the substantia gelatinosa of the spinal trigeminal nucleus of the guinea pig. J Neurophysiol 1996; 76: 38173822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Bloor, BC, Ward, DS, Belleville, JP, Maze, M. Effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine in humans. II. Hemodynamic changes. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 11341142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Chia, YY, Chan, MH, Ko, NH, Liu, K. Role of beta-blockade in anaesthesia and postoperative pain management after hysterectomy. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 799805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Caumo, W, Torres, F, Moreira, NL et al. The clinical impact of preoperative melatonin on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 12631271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Unlugenc, H, Gunduz, M, Guler, T, Yagmur, O, Isik, G. The effect of pre-anaesthetic administration of intravenous dexmedetomidine on postoperative pain in patients receiving patient-controlled morphine. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22: 386391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed