Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:40:10.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Air leakage around endotracheal tube cuffs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2004

A. Dullenkopf ,
A. Schmitz ,
M. Frei ,
A. C. Gerber  and
M. Weiss
A. Dullenkopf
Affiliation:
University Children’s Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia, Zurich, Switzerland
A. Schmitz
Affiliation:
University Children’s Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia, Zurich, Switzerland
M. Frei
Affiliation:
University Children’s Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia, Zurich, Switzerland
A. C. Gerber
Affiliation:
University Children’s Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia, Zurich, Switzerland
M. Weiss
Affiliation:
University Children’s Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia, Zurich, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

Summary

Background and objective: To compare the recently introduced Microcuff® endotracheal tube with conventional tubes in respect of the cuff pressures required to prevent air leakage.

Methods: The following tubes (ID 7.0 mm) were compared: Microcuff® HVLP ICU, Mallinckrodt HiLo®, Portex Profile Soft Seal®, Rüsch Super Safety Clear® and Sheridan CF®. Fifty patients undergoing endotracheal intubation with a cuffed tube of internal diameter 7.0 mm were studied. Tracheas were intubated using one of the endotracheal tubes in random order. Cuff pressure to prevent air leakage at standardized ventilator setting (peak inspiratory pressure 20 cmH2O/PEEP 5 cmH2O/respiratory rate 15 breaths min−1) was assessed by auscultation of audible sounds at the mouth. Patients characteristics and cuff pressures from each brand were compared to the Microcuff® group using the Mann-Whitney U-test (P < 0.05 was chosen as the level of statistical significance).

Results: Patients' median age (range) was 14.2 (12.0–17.1) yr, body weight 57.5 (40.0–81.9) kg and length 164.9 (146.5–190.0) cm. No significant differences in patients' characteristics were found between groups. Mean cuff pressure (all tubes) required for air sealing was 19.1 (8–42) cmH2O. The Microcuff® tube required significantly lower sealing pressures (9.5 (8–12) cmH2O) compared to the other brands of endotracheal tube (P < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U-test).

Conclusion: The Microcuff® endotracheal tube with its ultra-thin polyurethane cuff membrane required the lowest sealing pressure to prevent air leakage. These features are potentially of interest for long-term intubated patients and for cuffed endotracheal tubes in children, allowing tracheal sealing at lower cuff pressures implying less damage to the trachea.

Keywords

ANAESTHESIA, INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEALcuff
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 21 , Issue 6 , June 2004 , pp. 448 - 453
Copyright
2004 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Latto P. The cuff. In: Latto I, Vaughan R, eds. Difficulties in Tracheal Intubation. London, UK: WB Saunders Co., 1997: 51–78.
Craven D. Prevention of hospital-acquired pneumonia: measuring the effect in ounces, pounds and tons. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 229–231.Google Scholar
Young P, Ridley S. Ventilator-associated pneumonia. Diagnosis, pathogenesis and prevention. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 1183–1197.Google Scholar
Seegobin R, van Hasselt G. Endotracheal cuff pressure and tracheal mucosal blood flow: endoscopic study of the effects of four large volume cuffs. BMJ 1984; 288: 965–968.Google Scholar
Metha S. Safe lateral wall cuff pressure to prevent aspiration. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1984; 66: 426–427.Google Scholar
Metha S, Myat H. The cross sectional shape and circumference of the human trachea. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1984; 66: 356–358.Google Scholar
James I. Cuffed tubes in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2001; 11: 259–263.Google Scholar
Tu H, Saidi N, Leiutaud T, Bensaid S, Menival V, Duvaldestin P. Nitrous oxide increases endotracheal cuff pressure and the incidence of tracheal lesions in anaesthetized patients. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 187–190.Google Scholar
Combes X, Schauvliege F, Peyrouset O, et al. Intracuff pressure and tracheal morbidity: influence of filling with saline during nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 1120–1124.Google Scholar
Schaffranietz L, Wagner J, Olthoff D. Die Wertigkeit der automatischen Cuffdruckregulierung bei Halswirbelsäulen-und Schilddrüsenoperationen. DAC Abstractband 2003: PD 201.Google Scholar
Terashima H, Sakurai T, Takahashi S, Saitoh M, Hirayama K. Postintubation tracheal stenosis; problems associated with choice of management. Kyobu Geka 2002; 55: 837–842.Google Scholar
Ferdinande P, Kim DO. Prevention of postintubation laryngotracheal stenosis. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1995; 49: 341–346.Google Scholar
Dobrin P, Canfield T. Cuffed endotracheal tubes: mucosal pressures and tracheal wall blood flow. Am J Surg 1977; 133: 562–568.Google Scholar
Nordin U, Lindholm CE, Wolgast M. Blood flow in the rabbit tracheal mucosa under normal conditions and under the influence of tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1977; 21: 81–94.Google Scholar
Seegobin R, van Hasselt G. Aspiration beyond endotracheal cuffs. Can J Anesth 1986; 33: 273–279.Google Scholar
Young P, Rollinson M, Downward G, Henderson S. Leakage of fluid past the tracheal tube cuff in a benchtop model. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 557–562.Google Scholar
Dullenkopf A, Gerber A, Weiss M. Fluid leakage past tracheal tube cuffs: evaluation of the new Microcuff endotracheal tube. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20 (Suppl. 30): A251, 67.Google Scholar
Blunt M, Young P, Patil A, Haddock A. Gel lubrication of the tracheal tube cuff reduces pulmonary aspiration. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 377–381.Google Scholar
Asai T, Shingu K. Leakage of fluid around high-volume, low-pressure cuffs. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 38–42.Google Scholar
Oikkonen M, Aromaa U. Leakage of fluid around low-pressure tracheal tube cuffs. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 567–569.Google Scholar
Reali-Forster C, Kolobow T, Giacomini M, Hayashi T, Horiba K, Ferrans V. New ultrathin-walled endotracheal tube with a novel laryngeal seal design: long-term evaluation in sheep. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 162–172.Google Scholar
Young P, Blunt M. Improving the shape and compliance characteristics of a high-volume, low-pressure cuff improves tracheal seal. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83: 887–889.Google Scholar
Young P, Basson C, Hamilton D, Sa R. Prevention of tracheal aspiration using the pressure-limited tracheal tube cuff. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 559–563.Google Scholar
Young P, Ridley S, Downward G. Evaluation of a new design of tracheal tube cuff to prevent leakage of fluid to the lungs. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 796–799.Google Scholar
Guyton DC, Barlow MR, Besselievre TR. Influence of airway pressure on minimum occlusive endotracheal tube cuff pressure. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 91–94.Google Scholar