Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:13:29.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative study of pressure- and volume-controlled ventilation on pulse pressure variation in a model of hypovolaemia in rabbits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2008

E. B. Fonseca ,
D. A. Otsuki ,
D. T. Fantoni ,
F. Bliacheriene  and
J. O. C. Auler
E. B. Fonseca
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Investigation LIM/08-Anaesthesiology, São Paulo, Brazil
D. A. Otsuki
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Investigation LIM/08-Anaesthesiology, São Paulo, Brazil
D. T. Fantoni
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo, School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Surgery, São Paulo, Brazil
F. Bliacheriene
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, Hospital das Clínicas, Division of Anaesthesia, São Paulo, Brazil
J. O. C. Auler*
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, Hospital das Clínicas, Heart Institute, Anaesthesia Department and Surgical ICU, São Paulo, Brazil
*
Correspondence to: José Otávio Costa Auler Junior, Instituto do Coração (Incor) – Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar 44, 2° and. CEP 05403-000 São Paulo, Brazil. E-mail: auler@hcnet.usp.br; Tel/Fax: +55 11 3069 5232
Get access

Summary

Background and objective

Dynamic indices represented by systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation have been demonstrated to be more accurate than filling pressures in predicting fluid responsiveness. However, the literature is scarce concerning the impact of different ventilatory modes on these indices. We hypothesized that systolic pressure variation or pulse pressure variation could be affected differently by volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation in an experimental model, during normovolaemia and hypovolaemia.

Method

Thirty-two anaesthetized rabbits were randomly allocated into four groups according to ventilatory modality and volaemic status where G1-ConPCV was the pressure-controlled ventilation control group, G2-HemPCV was associated with haemorrhage, G3-ConVCV was the volume-controlled ventilation control group and G4-HemVCV was associated with haemorrhage. In the haemorrhage groups, blood was removed in two stages: 15% of the estimated blood volume withdrawal at M1, and, 30 min later, an additional 15% at M2. Data were submitted to analysis of variance for repeated measures; a value of P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

At M0 (baseline), no significant differences were observed among groups. At M1, dynamic parameters differed significantly among the control and hypovolaemic groups (P < 0.05) but not between ventilation modes. However, when 30% of the estimated blood volume was removed (M2), dynamic parameters became significantly higher in animals under volume-controlled ventilation when compared with those under pressure-controlled ventilation.

Conclusions

Under normovolaemia and moderate haemorrhage, dynamic parameters were not influenced by either ventilatory modalities. However, in the second stage of haemorrhage (30%), animals in volume-controlled ventilation presented higher values of systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation when compared with those submitted to pressure-controlled ventilation.

Keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR PHYSIOLOGYINTERMITTENT POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATIONHYPOVOLAEMIAPULSE PRESSURE VARIATIONRABBITS
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 25 , Issue 5 , May 2008 , pp. 388 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © European Society of Anaesthesiology 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Michard, F, Lopes, MR, Auler, JO. Pulse pressure variation: beyond the fluid management of patients with shock. Crit Care 2007; 11: 131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Lopes, MR, Auler, JOC, Michard, F. Volume management in critically ill patients: new insights. Clinics 2006; 61: 345–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Bliacheriene, F, Machado, SB, Fonseca, EB, Otsuki, D, JrAuler, JOC, Michard, F. Pulse pressure variation as a tool to detect hypovolaemia during pneumoperitoneum. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51: 1268–1272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Perel, A, Pizov, R, Cotev, S. Systolic blood pressure variation is a sensitive indicator of hypovolemia in ventilated dogs subjected to graded hemorrhage. Anesthesiology 1987; 67: 498–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Michard, F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 419–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Pinsky, MR. Assessment of indices of preload and volume responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005; 11: 235–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Pinsky, MR. The hemodynamic consequences of mechanical ventilation: an evolving story. Intensive Care Med 1997; 23: 493–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Perel, A. The value of delta down during haemorrhage. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83: 967–968.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Michard, F, Boussat, S, Chemla, D et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Preisman, S, Kogan, S, Berkenstadt, H, Perel, A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 746–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Davis, K, Branson, RD, Campbell, RS, Porembka, DT. Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation: Is flow waveform the difference? J Trauma 1996; 41: 808–814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Michard, F, Chemla, D, Richard, C et al. Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159: 935–939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Perel, A, Minkovich, L, Preisman, S, Abiad, M, Segal, E, Coriat, P. Assessing fluid-responsiveness by a standardized ventilatory maneuver: the respiratory systolic variation test. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 942–945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.De Baker, D, Heenen, S, Piagnerelli, M, Koch, M, Vincent, JL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 517–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Charron, C, Fessenmeyer, C, Cosson, C et al. The influence of tidal volume on the dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 1511–1517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Magder, S. Clinical usefulness of respiratory variations in arterial pressure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 169: 151–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Cournand, A, Motley, HL, JrWerko, L, Richards, DW. Physiological studies of the effects of intermittent positive pressure breathing on cardiac output in man. Am J Physiol 1948; 152: 162–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Robotham, JL, Rabson, J, Permutt, S, Bromberger-Barnea, B. Left ventricular hemodynamics during respiration. J Appl Physiol 1979; 47: 1295–1303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Robotham, JL, Lixfeld, W, Holland, L et al. The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on right and left ventricular performance. Am Rev Respir Dis 1980; 121: 677–683.Google ScholarPubMed
20.Bromberger-Barnea, B. Mechanical effects of inspiration on heart functions. Fed Proc 1981; 40: 2172–2177.Google ScholarPubMed
21.Scharf, SM, Caldini, P, Ingram, RH. Cardiovascular effects of increasing airway pressure in the dog. Am J Physiol 1977; 232: H35–H43.Google ScholarPubMed
22.Denault, AY, Gastor, TA, Goresan, JI, Mandarino, WA, Deneault, LG, Pinsky, MR. Determinants of aortic pressure variation during positive pressure ventilation in man. Chest 1999; 116: 176–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Michard, F, Boussat, S, Chemla, D et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Chemla, D, Hebert, JL, Coirault, C et al. Total arterial compliance estimated by stroke volume-to-aortic pulse pressure ratio in humans. Am J Physiol 1998; 274: H500–H505.Google ScholarPubMed
25.Jardin, F, Farcot, JC, Gueret, P, Prost, JF, Ozier, Y, Bourdarias, JP. Cyclic changes in arterial pulse during respiratory support. Circulation 1983; 68: 266–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed