Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:25:12.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correct sizing of the CobraPLA is necessary for valid study results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2006

D. D. Alfery ,
O. Ghelher ,
T. Ezri  and
P. Szmuk
D. D. Alfery
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
O. Ghelher
Affiliation:
UT Houston Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
T. Ezri
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia, Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel Outcomes Research Institute™, Louisville, KY, USA
P. Szmuk
Affiliation:
UT Southwestern Medical School and Children's Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA Outcomes Research™ Institute Louisville, KY, USA
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 23 , Issue 8 , August 2006 , pp. 714 - 715
Copyright
© 2006 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Turan A, Kaya G, Koyuncu O, Karamanlioglu B, Pamukcu Z. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and laryngeal tube (LT) with the new perilaryngeal airway (CobraPLA) in short surgical procedures. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006; 23 (3): 234–238.Google Scholar
Gaitini L, Yanovski B, Somri M, Vaida S, Riad T, Alfery D. A comparison between the PLA Cobra and the laryngeal mask airway unique during spontaneous ventilation: a randomized prospective study. Anesth Analg 2006; 102 (2): 631–636.Google Scholar