Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:11:11.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficacy of prophylactic droperidol, ondansetron or both in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in major gynaecological surgery. A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

A. J. Peixoto
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital de Caridade, Erechim, RS, Brazil
A. J. Peixoto Filho
Affiliation:
Sections of General Internal Medicine and Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
L. F. Leães
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital de Caridade, Erechim, RS, Brazil
M. F. Celich
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital de Caridade, Erechim, RS, Brazil
M. A. V. Barros
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital de Caridade, Erechim, RS, Brazil
Get access

Abstract

We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing droperidol 1.25 mg intravenously (i.v.) (group 1, n = 30), ondansetron 4 mg i.v. (group 2, n = 30), or both (group 3, n = 30) in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in the first 24 h following major gynaecological procedures under combined general and epidural anaesthesia. PONV was analysed by a linear nausea/vomiting score, incidence of nausea and vomiting, and the need for antiemetic rescue. Our results showed a similar incidence of nausea and vomiting in all groups (G1 33%, G2 40%, G3 43%). However, when comparisons were made according to the time of assessment, combination therapy resulted in significantly lower PONV than droperidol in the first hour (0% vs. 13%, P < 0.05) and second hour (0% vs. 13%, P < 0.05), and than ondansetron on the first hour (0% vs. 13%, P < 0.05). A trend persisted up to the fourth hour but was not statistically significant in either group. In conclusion, droperidol and ondansetron are effective agents in the prevention of PONV, and their combination seems to provide slightly better results than either drug alone.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2000 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)