Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:10:41.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is the Datex-Ohmeda® M-NMT module a research quality instrument?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2005

A. F. Kopman
A. F. Kopman
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 21 , Issue 10 , October 2004 , pp. 833 - 834
Copyright
© 2004 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Motamed C, Kirov K, Combes X, Duvaldestin P. Comparison between the Datex-Ohmeda M-NMT module and a force–displacement transducer for monitoring neuromuscular blockade. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20: 467–469.Google Scholar
Dahaba AA, von Klobucar F, Rehak PH, List WF. The neuromuscular transmission module versus the relaxometer mechanomyograph for neuromuscular block monitoring. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 591–596.Google Scholar
Merle JC, Jurczyk M, D'Honneur G, Ruggier R, Duvaldestin P. Onset of neuromuscular block is the same if the ipsilateral or contralateral limb to the injection site is used for monitoring. Br J Anaesth 1995; 74: 333–334.Google Scholar
Kirkegaard-Nielsen H, Helbo-Hansen HS, Lindholm P, Pedersen HS, Severinsen IK, Schmidt MB. New equipment for neuromuscular transmission monitoring: a comparison of the TOF-Guard with the Myograph 2000. J Clin Monit Comput 1998; 14: 19–27.Google Scholar