Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:03:11.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lidocaine 10% in the endotracheal tube cuff: blood concentrations, haemodynamic and clinical effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

F. Altintaş
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty Istanbul University, Istanbul Turkey
P. Bozkurt
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty Istanbul University, Istanbul Turkey
G. Kaya
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty Istanbul University, Istanbul Turkey
G. Akkan
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
Get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects (common haemodynamic variables, peak cuff pressures, the incidence of reaction (‘bucking’) during extubation and the incidence of sore throat after operation) of lidocaine 10% instilled into the endotracheal tube cuff in intubated patients. Plasma concentrations of lidocaine were assayed. Seventy ASA class I–II patients scheduled for plastic surgery were studied. Patients were randomly divided in two groups: the cuff of the endotracheal tube was inflated with either lidocaine 10% (group L) or with saline (group S) immediately after endotracheal intubation. In group L patients, the haemodynamic changes were less (P < 0.05), and the peak cuff pressure was lower (P < 0.01) than for group S. At extubation, more patients reacted (‘bucked’) in group S (70.5% vs. 19.4%, P < 0.01). The incidence and severity of sore throat were significantly lower in group L 1 and 24-h after extubation. Plasma lidocaine concentrations did not reach toxic values. Lidocaine 10%, compared with saline, in the endotracheal tube cuff was associated with less disturbance of haemodynamic responses and less incidence of bucking during tracheal extubation. Lidocaine was also effective in reducing of incidence and severity of sore throat after operation.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2000 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)