Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:14:44.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preliminary experience of combined peri- and retrobulbar block in surgery for penetrating eye injuries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2005

L. Niemi-Murola ,
I. Immonen ,
H. Kallio  and
E.-L. Maunuksela
L. Niemi-Murola
Affiliation:
Helsinki University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki, Finland
I. Immonen
Affiliation:
Helsinki University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Helsinki, Finland
H. Kallio
Affiliation:
Helsinki University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki, Finland
E.-L. Maunuksela
Affiliation:
Helsinki University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki, Finland
Get access

Extract

Summary

Background and objective: Regional anaesthesia has not been recommended as an anaesthetic method for penetrating eye injuries because it is suspected to aggravate the injury already present. After having successfully managed the treatment of a penetrating eye injury under combined peri- and retrobulbar block in an ASA IV patient, it was decided to evaluate this anaesthetic method further in the treatment of such emergency cases.

Methods: Twenty adult patients with penetrating eye injuries with a maximum wound length of 8 mm extending up to 4 mm posteriorly from the limbus were operated on under combined peri- and retrobulbar anaesthesia. Eighteen patients receiving general anaesthesia served as controls.

Results: The mean (range) volume injected for a satisfactory peribulbar retrobulbar block was 7.4 (6.5–8.0) mL, six patients needed an additional retrobulbar injection before surgery (2.9, range 2–4, mL). All patients receiving regional anaesthesia were satisfied with the anaesthetic method and the surgeons considered the surgical conditions as good. No problems relating to local anaesthesia were observed or reported by any of the patients.

Conclusions: In the hands of an experienced anaesthesiologist and under certain conditions, regional anaesthesia appears to be suitable for adult patients having penetrating eye injuries.

Keywords

ANAESTHESIA, conduction, nerve block, peribulbar block, retrobulbar blockANAESTHETICS, LOCAL, bupivacaine, lidocaineSENSE ORGANS, eyeSPECIALTIES, SURGICAL, ophthalmology
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 20 , Issue 6 , June 2003 , pp. 478 - 481
Copyright
© 2003 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Donlon JV. Anesthesia and eye, ear, nose and throat surgery. In: Miller RD, ed. Anesthesia. New York, USA: Churchill Livingstone, 1994: 2175–2196.
Cunningham AJ, Barry P. Intraocular pressure: physiology and implications for anaesthetic management. Can J Anaesth 1986; 33: 195–208.Google Scholar
Murphy DF. Anesthesia and intraocular pressure. Anesth Analg 1985; 64: 520–530.Google Scholar
Vanacker B, Dekegel D, Dionys J, et al. Changes in intraocular pressure associated with the administration of propofol. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59: 1514–1517.Google Scholar
Ghignone M, Noe C, Calvillo O, et al. The effects of clonidine on intraocular pressure. Anesthesiology 1988; 68: 707–716.Google Scholar
Frow MW, Miranda-Caballo JI, Akhtar TM, Hugkulstone CE. Single injection peribulbar anaesthesia: Total upper eyelid drop as an end-point marker. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 750–756.Google Scholar
Nociti JR, Serzedo PSM, Zuccolotto EB, Nunes AMM, Ferreira SB. Intraocular pressure and ropivacaine in peribulbar block: a comparative study with bupivacaine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 600–602.Google Scholar
Kallio H, Uusitalo R, Maunuksela EL. Randomised, prospective trial: topical anesthesia with or without propofol sedation and retrobulbar/peribulbar anesthesia for cataract extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27: 1372–1379.Google Scholar
Kallio H, Paloheimo M, Maunuksela EL. Hyaluronidase as an adjuvant in bupivacaine-lidocaine mixture for retrobulbar/peribulbar block. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 934–937.Google Scholar
Aldrete JA, Krovulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970; 49: 924–934.Google Scholar
McGoldrick KE, Feitl M, Krupin T. Neural blockade in ophthalmological surgery. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO, eds. Neural Blockade in Clinical Anaesthesia and Management of Pain. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott-Raven, 1998: 533–556.
Stevens J, Giubilei M, Lanigan L, Hykin P. Sub-tenon, retrobulbar and peribulbar local anaesthesia: the effect upon intraocular pressure. Eur J Implant Ref Surg 1993; 5: 25–28.Google Scholar
Jay WM, Carter H, Williams B, Green K. Effect of applying the Honan intraocular pressure reducer before cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 100: 523–527.Google Scholar
O'Donoghue EO, Batterbury M, Lavy T. Effect on intraocular pressure of local anaesthesia in eyes undergoing intraocular surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 1994; 78: 605–607.Google Scholar
Herrick IA, Gelb AW, Nichols B, Kirby J. Patient-controlled propofol sedation for elderly patients: safety and patient attitude toward control. Can J Anaesth 1996; 43: 1014–1018.Google Scholar
Janzen PRM, Chistys A, Vucevic M. Patient-controlled sedation using propofol in elderly patients in day-case cataract surgery. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 635–636.Google Scholar
Osborne GA, Rudkin GE, Curtis NJ, et al. Intra-operative patient-controlled sedation. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 553–556.Google Scholar