Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T01:31:40.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

C. Martin-Castro*
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, IDIBELL-University Hospital of Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
A. Montero
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, IDIBELL-University Hospital of Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
*
Correspondence to: Carmen Martin-Castro, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: carmen.martin@e-motiva.com; Tel: +34 616656534; Fax: +34 935906259

Abstract

Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © European Society of Anaesthesiology 2008

EDITOR:

Drs Eipe and Doherty’s letter demonstrates a lack of understanding of the aims of our study [Reference Martin-Castro and Montero1] and a limited knowledge of the term oncoplastic surgery.

Firstly, there were no patients with oro-pharyngeal malignancies in our study because the primary objectives were to measure cough at emergence and postoperative sore throat for a flexible laryngeal mask group (FLMA) vs. reinforced tracheal tube group (RTT) [Reference Martin-Castro and Montero1]. Both symptoms would have been very difficult to evaluate in case of oro-pharyngeal surgery.

Secondly, in the University Hospital of Bellvitge there is a Head and Neck Committee comprised of oncologists, anaesthesiologists, otolaryngologists and plastic and maxillofacial surgeons. This Committee plans and performs several major cancer procedures with microvascular reconstructive techniques in a week. We therefore have a lot of experience in excision and microvascular reconstructive surgery of major head and neck tumours and also in difficult airway management. We concur with Drs Eipe and Doherty that these major tumours often result in anticipated difficult airways and may require nasotracheal fibreoptic intubation or perioperative tracheotomy [Reference Mishra, Bhatnagar, Jha and Singhal2], usually take more than 8 h of surgery and need postoperative ventilatory support and ICU stay [Reference Jones, Jarrahy, Song, Kaufman and Markowitz3]. The expected time of surgery in our study (methods section) was less than 3 h and the real time (results section) was 112 ± 32 min for the FLMA vs. 117 ± 42 min for the RTT, which means that our study did not include major head and neck surgery with microsurgical reconstructive techniques. Our procedures included skin tumours on the head, face or neck and breast cancer with local flap reconstruction as well as sentinel lymph node biopsy when indicated.

Thirdly, in all of our patients the airway devices were removed in the operating room at the conclusion of the surgery and patients were then transferred to the post-anaesthetic care unit and 1 h later to the ward without respiratory problems [Reference Martin-Castro and Montero1].

Fourthly, no other authors except Eipe and colleagues [Reference Eipe, Choudhrie, Dildeep Pillai and Choudhrie4,Reference Eipe, Choudhrie, Pillai and Choudhrie5] have used the term oncoplastic surgery for major head and neck tumours followed by reconstruction using microvascular free tissue flaps. The term oncoplastic surgery is more frequently used to describe surgical conservative treatment for breast cancer [Reference Baildam6,Reference Huemer, Schrenk, Moser, Wagner and Wayand7]. We therefore used this term in our study because about 60% of our procedures were for breast cancer. It was not possible to describe all procedures in detail due to the need to be concise in a publication.

References

1.Martin-Castro, C, Montero, A. Flexible laryngeal mask as an alternative to reinforced tracheal tube for upper chest, head and neck oncoplastic surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25: 261266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Mishra, S, Bhatnagar, S, Jha, RR, Singhal, AK. Airway management of patients undergoing oral cancer surgery: a retrospective study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22: 510514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Jones, NF, Jarrahy, R, Song, JI, Kaufman, MR, Markowitz, B. Postoperative medical complications – not microsurgical complications – negatively influence the morbidity, mortality, and true costs after microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 20532060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Eipe, N, Choudhrie, A, Dildeep Pillai, A, Choudhrie, R. Elective pre-operative tracheostomy for head and neck oncoplastic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50: 523524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Eipe, N, Choudhrie, A, Pillai, AD, Choudhrie, R. Postoperative airway management in head and neck oncoplastic surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22: 953954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Baildam, AD. Oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Huemer, GM, Schrenk, P, Moser, F, Wagner, E, Wayand, W. Oncoplastic techniques allow breast-conserving treatment in centrally located breast cancers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120: 390398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed