Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:15:16.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should the ventilator be withdrawn? Attitudes of the general public, nurses and physicians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

P. Sjökvist ,
L. Berggren ,
M. Svantesson  and
T. Nilstun
P. Sjökvist
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, örebro Medical Centre Hospital, örebro, Sweden
L. Berggren
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, örebro Medical Centre Hospital, örebro, Sweden
M. Svantesson
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, örebro Medical Centre Hospital, örebro, Sweden
T. Nilstun
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Ethics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

In a Swedish nation-wide study, 1196 members of the general public, and 121 physicians and 339 nurses drawn from 29 intensive care units were questioned about the use of ventilator treatment for severely ill patients. Response rates were 64%, 88% and 86%, respectively. Two typical case history scenarios were presented: one describing a conscious and competent patient with pneumonia and severe cancer, and the other describing a patient who had been comatose for 1 month following head trauma. In the case of the cancer patient, 49% of the general public, 63% of the physicians and 59% of the nurses answered that theywould wish that the ventilator treatment be discontinued, if they were the patient. In the case of the comatose patient, 48% of the general public, 82% of the physicians and 70% of the nurses answered that they would wish that the ventilator treatment to be discontinued, if they were a relative of the patient. Respondents own preferences, in the three groups,for life support favoured withdrawal of ventilator treatment.

Keywords

ventilator treatmentethics medicalintensive carepublic opinionquestionnairelife support
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 16 , Issue 8 , August 1999 , pp. 526 - 533
Copyright
1999 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)