Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:17:10.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transition to post-operative epidural or patient-controlled intravenous analgesia following®total intravenous anaesthesia with remifentanil and propofol for abdominal surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

T. A. Bowdle
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA
L. B. Ready
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA
E. D. Kharasch
Affiliation:
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA
W. W. Nichols
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA
K. Cox
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA
Get access

Abstract

Remifentanil is an ultrashort acting mu opioid, well suited to total intravenous (i.v.) anaesthesia. Pain immediately following emergence from anaesthesia is a potential problem because of the rapid offset. This study investigated the transition from remifentanil/propofol total intravenous anaesthesia to post-operative analgesia with epidural or patient controlled analgesia morphine in 22 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. A remifentanil post-operative infusion initiated during emergence was titrated in the recovery room for 30 min, at which time 14% of patients had a pain score of 2 and 86% had pain scores of 0 or 1 (0 = no pain; 1 = mild pain; 2 = moderate pain; 3 = severe pain), at a mean infusion rate of 0.086 mug kg −1 min −1 . A smooth transition was then made to either epidural analgesia or patient controlled analgesia with morphine; pain scores were not significantly changed during the transition. Nausea occurred in 16 of the 22 patients, but only following administration of morphine. Epidural analgesia produced significantly lower pain scores on the surgical ward compared with patient controlled analgesia.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
1997 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)