Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:04:39.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using the Sustained Attention to Response Test to detect cognitive dysfunction after day case surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

J. P. Thompson ,
S. C. Rushman ,
A. J. Fox ,
A. J. Lloyd  and
R. A. Atcheson
J. P. Thompson
Affiliation:
Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
S. C. Rushman
Affiliation:
Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
A. J. Fox
Affiliation:
Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
A. J. Lloyd
Affiliation:
Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
R. A. Atcheson
Affiliation:
Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
Get access

Abstract

Background and objective: Cognitive dysfunction has been reported after general anaesthesia, but its assessment is time consuming and difficult to evaluate. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of using the Sustained Attention to Response Test to assess 35 ASA I-II adults (mean age 31.6 yr) undergoing day case surgery under general anaesthesia, and 25 ASA I-II adults (mean age 47.8 yr) undergoing day case surgery under local anaesthesia.

Methods: The Sustained Attention to Response Test was performed before surgery and repeated 2 h after surgery.

Results: When patients repeated the test after surgery under local anaesthesia, the number of incorrect responses increased, but reaction times decreased (P < 0.05). Following general anaesthesia, the number of incorrect responses increased (P < 0.05), but reaction times remained unchanged.

Conclusions: The Sustained Attention to Response Test is simple to administer and may be a useful tool when comparing different anaesthetic techniques and their effects on postoperative deficits in sustained attention.

Keywords

analgesia and anaesthesiaanaesthesia recovery periodambulatory surgical procedurespsychomotor performancetask performance and analysis
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 19 , Issue 8 , August 2002 , pp. 585 - 588
Copyright
2002 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)