Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:35:49.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring data assimilation and forecasting issues for an urban crime model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2015

DAVID J. B. LLOYD ,
NARATIP SANTITISSADEEKORN  and
MARTIN B. SHORT
DAVID J. B. LLOYD
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK email: D.J.Lloyd@surrey.ac.uk; n.santitissadeekorn@surrey.ac.uk
NARATIP SANTITISSADEEKORN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK email: D.J.Lloyd@surrey.ac.uk; n.santitissadeekorn@surrey.ac.uk
MARTIN B. SHORT
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA email: mbshort@math.gatech.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we explore some of the various issues that may occur in attempting to fit a dynamical systems (either agent- or continuum-based) model of urban crime to data on just the attack times and locations. We show how one may carry out a regression analysis for the model described by Short et al. (2008, Math. Mod. Meth. Appl. Sci.) by using simulated attack data from the agent-based model. It is discussed how one can incorporate the attack data into the partial differential equations for the expected attractiveness to burgle and the criminal density to predict crime rates between attacks. Using this predicted crime rate, we derive a likelihood function that one can maximise in order to fit parameters and/or initial conditions for the model. We focus on carrying out data assimilation for two different parameter regions, namely in the case where stationary and non-stationary crime hotspots form. It is found that the likelihood function is ‘flat’ for large ranges of parameters, and that this has major implications for crime forecasting. Hence, we look at how one might carry out a goodness-of-fit and forecasting analysis for crime rates given the range of parameter fits. We show how one can use the Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic to assess the goodness-of-fit. The dynamical systems analysis of the partial differential equations proves invaluable to understanding how the crime rate forecasts depend on the parameters and their sensitivity. Finally, we outline several interesting directions for future research in this area where we believe that the combination of dynamical systems modelling, analysis, and data assimilation can prove effective in developing policing strategies for urban crime.

Keywords

Crime hotspotsData assimilationMaximum likelihoodPoint processParameter estimation
Type
Papers
Information
European Journal of Applied Mathematics , Volume 27 , Issue 3: Mathematical Modelling of Crime and Security , June 2016 , pp. 451 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Berestycki, H. & Nadal, J. P. (2010) Self-organised critical hot spots of criminal activity. Euro. J. Appl. Math. 21(Special Double Issue 4–5), 371–399.Google Scholar
[2]Berestycki, H., Rodriguez, N. & Ryzhik, L. (2013) Traveling wave solutions in a reaction-diffusion model for criminal activity. SIAM Multiscale Model. Simul. 11 (4), 1097–1126.Google Scholar
[3]Berestycki, H., Wei, J. & Winter, M. (2014) Existence of symmetric and asymmetric spikes for a crime hotspot model. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 46 (1), 691–719.Google Scholar
[4]Bowers, K. J., Johnson, S. D. & Pease, K. (2004) Prospective hot-spotting the future of crime mapping? Br. J. Criminology 44 (5), 641–658.Google Scholar
[5]Chainey, S., Tompson, L. & Uhlig, S. (2008) The utility of hotspot mapping for predicting spatial patterns of crime. Secur. J. 21 (1), 4–28.Google Scholar
[6]Cox, D. R. & Lewis, P. A. W. (1966) The Statistical Analysis of Series of Events, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
[7]Evans, A. J. (2011) Agent-Based Models of Geographical Systems, chapter Uncertainty and Error. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
[8]Evensen, G. (2007) Data Assimilation: The Ensemble Kalman Filter, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
[9]Douglas Faires, J. & Burden, R. (1998) Numerical Methods, 2nd ed., Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Pacific Grove, CA. With 1 IBM-PC floppy disk (3.5 inch; HD).Google Scholar
[10]Fielding, M. & Jones, V. (2012) ‘Disrupting the optimal forager’: Predictive risk mapping and domestic burglary reduction in Trafford, Greater manchester. Int. J. Police Sci. Manage. 14 (1), 30–41.Google Scholar
[11]Flanagan, O. J. (1981) Psychology, progress, and the problem of reflexivity: A study in the epistemological foundations of psychology. J. History Behav. Sci. 17 (3), 375–386.Google Scholar
[12]Gilbert, N. (2008) Agent-Based Models, SAGE Publications, CA.Google Scholar
[13]Gordon, N. J., Salmond, D. J. & Smith, A. F. M. (1993) Novel approach to nonlinear/non-gaussian bayesian state estimation. Radar Signal Process. IEE Proc. F 140 (2), 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Johnson, A. & Kotz, S. (1970) Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Univariate Distributions, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
[15]Johnson, S. D. (2007) Prospective Crime Mapping in Operational Context: Final report. Home Office, UK.Google Scholar
[16]Johnson, S. D., Bowers, K. J., Birks, D. J. & Pease, K. (2009) Predictive mapping of crime by promap: Accuracy, units of analysis, and the environmental backcloth. Putting Crime in its Place, Springer, Berlin, pp. 171–198.Google Scholar
[17]Kennedy, L. W., Caplan, J. M. & Piza, E. (2011) Risk clusters, hotspots, and spatial intelligence: Risk terrain modeling as an algorithm for police resource allocation strategies. J. Quant. Criminology 27 (3), 339–362.Google Scholar
[18]Kevrekidis, I. G. & Samaey, G. (2009) Equation-free multiscale computation: Algorithms and applications. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 60, 321–344.Google Scholar
[19]Kolokolnikov, T., Ward, M. J. & Wei, J. (2012) The stability of steady-state hot-spot patterns for a reaction-diffusion model of Urban crime. Discrete and Continuous Dyn. Syst. – Series B, 19 (5), 1373–1410.Google Scholar
[20]Liu, H. & Brown, D. E. (2003) Criminal incident prediction using a point-pattern-based density model. Int. J. Forecast. 19 (4), 603–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Lloyd, D. J. B. & O'Farrell, H. (2013) On localised hotspots of an urban crime model. Phys. D 253, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Mitchell, L. & Cates, M. E. (2010) Hawkes process as a model of social interactions: A view on video dynamics. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43 (4), 045101.Google Scholar
[23]Mohler, G. O. & Short, M. B. (2012) Geographic profiling from kinetic models of criminal behavior. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 72 (1), 163–180.Google Scholar
[24]Mohler, G. O., Short, M. B., Jeffrey Brantingham, P., Paik Schoenberg, F. & Tita, G. E. (2011) Self-exciting point process modeling of crime. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 106 (493), 100–108.Google Scholar
[25]Mohler, G. O., Short, M. B., Malinowski, S., Johnson, M., Tita, G. E., Bertozzi, A. L. & Brantingham, P. J. (2014) Randomized controlled field trials of predictive policing. Preprint 2015, J. Am. Stat. Assoc.Google Scholar
[26]Short, M. B. & Bertozzi, A. L. (2010) Nonlinear patterns in urban crime: Hotspots, bifurcations, and suppression. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 9 (2), 462–483.Google Scholar
[27]Short, M. B., Jeffrey Brantingham, P., Bertozzi, A. L. & Tita, G. E. (2010) Dissipation and displacement of hotspots in reaction-diffusion models of crime. PNAS 107 (9), 3961–3965.Google Scholar
[28]Short, M. B., D'Orsogna, M. R., Brantingham, P. J. & Tita, G. E. (2009) Measuring and modeling repeat and near-repeat burglary effects. J. Quant. Criminology 25 (3), 325–339.Google Scholar
[29]Short, M. B., D'Orsogna, M. R., Pasour, V. B., Tita, G. E., Jeffrey Brantingham, P., Bertozzi, A. L. & Chayes, L. B. (2008) A statistical model of criminal behavior. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 18, 1249–1267.Google Scholar
[30]Walker, A. M. (1969) On the asymptotic behaviour of posterior distributions. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B (Methodological) 31 (1), 80–88.Google Scholar
[31]Waltner-Toews, D. & Kay, J. (2005) The evolution of an ecosystem approach: The diamond schematic and an adaptive methodology for ecosystem sustainability and health. Ecology Soc. 10 (1), 38.Google Scholar
[32]Wang, X. & Brown, D. E. (2012) The spatio-temporal modeling for criminal incidents. Secur. Inform. 1 (1), 1–17.Google Scholar
[33]Zipkin, J. R., Short, M. B. & Bertozzi, A. L. (2014) Cops on the dots in a mathematical model of urban crime and police response. Discrete Continuous Dyn. Syst. – Series B 19 (5), 1479–1506.Google Scholar