Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:18:29.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conflict and Interaction in the Iron Age: The Origins of Urartian–Assyrian Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Kemalettin Köroğlu
Kemalettin Köroğlu*
Affiliation:
Ancient History Department, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey
*
[email: kemalettin@marmara.edu.tr]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Neo-Assyrian Kingdom and the Urartian Kingdom were two important Near Eastern states in the Middle Iron Age (ninth to sixth centuries BC) that steered political developments and considerably transformed the lives of populations within their territories. This article aims to explore the origins of Urartian–Assyrian relations: the processes and ways through which Mesopotamian and Assyrian influences reached the eastern Anatolian highlands. The populations who founded the Urartian Kingdom lived mostly as semi-nomadic tribes in eastern Anatolia and surrounding areas during the Early Iron Age (thirteenth to ninth centuries BC). It is impossible to explain the emergence of the Urartian Kingdom in the Van region towards the mid-ninth century BC—which quickly became a powerful rival of its contemporaries—as a natural development of local culture. The main question at this stage is how and from where Assyrian influences were transmitted to the tribes who founded the Urartian Kingdom. Our opinion is that the answer to this question should be sought in the Upper Tigris region, which was inhabited by both cultures (Pre-Urartian and Assyrian) before the foundation of the Urartian Kingdom.

Le royaume néo-assyrien et le royaume d'Urartu étaient deux importants Etats du Proche-Orient durant l'âge du fer moyen (9e au 6e siécle av. J.-C.), dirigeant les développements politiques et transformant de façon substantielle la vie des populations sur leurs territoires. Cet article a pour but d'analyser les origines de la relation Urartu – Assyrie et donc les processus et chemins par lesquels les influences mésopotamiennes et assyriennes arrivaient dans les régions montagneuses de l'Anatolie orientale. Les peuples fondateurs du royaume d‘ Urartu vivaient pour la plupart en tant que tribus semi-nomades en Anatolie orientale et dans les régions environnantes pendant l'âge du fer ancien (13e au 9e siècle av. J.-C.). On ne peut pas expliquer l'émergence du royaume d'Urartu—qui très vite devenait un puissant rival des ses contemporains—dans la région de Van vers le milieu du 9e siècle av. J.-C. comme un développement naturel de la culture locale. La principale question à ce point est de savoir comment et d'où les influences assyriennes furent transmises aux tribus fondateurs du royaume d'Urartu. Nous pensons qu'il faut chercher la réponse à cette question dans la région du Haut Tigre, qui fut habitée par les deux cultures avant la fondation du royaume d'Urartu. Translation by Isabelle Gerges.

Das Neuassyrische Reich und das Königreich von Urartu waren zwei bedeutende vorderasiatische Staaten der mittleren Eisenzeit (9.-6. Jh. v. Chr.), die die politischen Entwicklungen lenkten und das Leben der Bevölkerung in ihren Territorien in wesentlichem Maße veränderten. Dieser Beitrag hat zum Ziel, die Wurzeln der urartäisch-assyrischen Beziehungen und somit auch die Prozesse und Wege, über die mesopotamische und assyrische Einflüsse das Hochland Ostanatoliens erreichten, zu beleuchten. Die Bevölkerungsgruppen, die das urartäische Reich gründeten, lebten während der frühen Eisenzeit (13.-9. Jh. v. Chr.) weitgehend als halbnomadische Stämme in Ostanatolien und umliegenden Regionen. Es ist nicht möglich, die Entstehung des urartäischen Königreiches, das schnell ein mächtiger Rivale seiner Zeitgenossen wurde, allein als einen natürlichen Entwicklungsprozess der lokalen Kulturen um die Mitte des 9. Jh. v. Chr. in der Van-Region zu verstehen. Die wichtigste Frage ist dabei zu diesem Zeitpunkt, wie und woher assyrische Einflüsse auf die Stämme trafen, die das Königreich von Urartu gründeten. Wir meinen, dass die Antwort auf diese Frage in der Region des oberen Tigris gesucht werden sollte, die vor der Gründung des urartäischen Reiches von beiden Kulturen besiedelt wurde. Translation by Heiner Schwarzberg.

Keywords

Early Iron AgeMiddle Iron Ageeastern AnatoliaUpper Tigris regionUruatriNairiUrartian KingdomNeo-Assyrian Kingdomâge du fer ancienâge du fer moyenAnatolie orientalerégion du Haut TigreUruatriNairiroyaume d'Urarturoyaume néo-assyrienfrühe Eisenzeitmittlere EisenzeitOstanatolienobere Tigris-RegionUruatriNairiUrartäisches ReichNeuassyrisches Reich
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , 2015 , pp. 111 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 the European Association of Archaeologists 

References

Bartl, K. 2001. Eastern Anatolia in the Early Iron Age. In: Eichmann, R. & Parzinger, H., eds. Migration und Kulturtransfer: der Wandel vorder-und zentralasiatischer Kulturen im Umbruch vom 2. zum 1. vorchristlichen Jahrtausend: Akten des Internationalen Kolloquiums, Berlin, 23. bis 26. November 1999. Bonn: Habelt, pp. 383–410.Google Scholar
Bartl, P.V. 1999-2001. Zum felsrerief von Eğil. State Archives of Assyria Bulletin, 13: 27–37.Google Scholar
Derin, Z. 1994. The Urartian Cremation Jars in Van and Elazığ Museums. In: Çilingiroğlu, A. & French, D.H., eds. Anatolian Iron Ages III. Anadolu Demir Çağları 3. The Proceedings of the Third Anatolian Iron Ages Colloquium Held at Van, 6–12 August 1990/III. Anadolu Demir Çağları Sempozyumu Bildirileri Van, 6–12 Ağustos 1990. Ankara: The British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, pp. 49–62.Google Scholar
Dinçol, A. & Dinçol, B. 1992. Die urartäische Inschrift aus Hanak (Kars). In: Otten, H., Akurgal, E., Ertem, H. & Süel, A., eds. Sedat Alp'a Armağan. Festchrift für Sedat Alp. Hittite and Other Anatolian and Near Eastern Studies in Honour of Sedat Alp. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, pp. 109–17.Google Scholar
Erdem, A.Ü. 2011. Doğu Anadolu'un Demir Çağı Aşiretleri. Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, 14: 59–68.Google Scholar
Grayson, A.K. 1991. Assyrian Rulers of the Early First Millennium BC I (1114–859 BC): The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia, Assyrian Periods, vol. 2. London: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Grayson, A.K. 1996. Assyrian Rulers of the Early First Millennium BC II (858–745 BC): The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia, Assyrian Periods, vol. 3. London: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Grayson, A.K., Frame, G., Franye, D. & Maidman, M.P. 1987. Assyrian Rulers of the Third and Second Millennia BC (to 1115 BC). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Guarducci, G. 2011. Facing an Empire: Hırbemerdon Tepe and the Upper Tigris Region during the Early Iron Age and Neo-Assyrian Period. Piscataway: Georgias Press.Google Scholar
Haller, A. 1954. Die Gräber und Grüfte von Assur. Berlin: Mann.Google Scholar
Hauser, S.R. 2012. Status, Tod und Ritual. Stadt- und Sozialstruktur Assurs in neuassyrischer Zeit. Wiesbaden: Harrossowits Verlag.Google Scholar
Herles, M. 2011. Überlegungen zur Sitte der Kremation bei den Urartäern. Armenian Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 6 (1): 60–90.Google Scholar
Kessler, K. 1980. Untersuchungen zur historischen Topographie Nordmesopotamiens: nach keilschriftlichen Quellen d. 1. Jahrtausends v. Chr. Wiesbaden: Reichert in Komm.Google Scholar
Köroğlu, K. 1998. Üçtepe I: Yeni Kazı ve Yüzey Bulguları Işığında Diyarbakır/Üçtepe ve Çevresinin Yeni Assur Dönemi Tarihi Coğrafyası. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.Google Scholar
Köroğlu, K. 2003. The Transition from Bronze Age to Iron Ages in Eastern Anatolia. In: Fischer, B., Genz, H., Jean, E. & Köroğlu, K., eds. Identifying Changes: The Transition from Bronze to Iron Ages in Anatolia and Its Neighbouring Regions. Proceedings of the International Workshop, Istanbul, November 8–9, 2002. İstanbul: Türk Eskiçağ Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yayınları, pp. 231–44.Google Scholar
Köroğlu, K. 2007. New Observations on the Origin of the Single-Roomed Rock-Cut Tombs of Eastern Anatolia. In: Alparslan, M., Doğan-Alparslan, M. & Peker, H., eds. Belkıs Dinçol ve Ali Dinçol'a Armağan. VITA. Festschrift in Honor of Belkıs Dinçol and Ali Dinçol. İstanbul: Ege Yayınları, pp. 445–56.Google Scholar
Köroğlu, K. 2011. Urartu: Krallık ve Aşiretler/Urartu: The Kingdom and Tribes. In: Köroğlu, K. & Konyar, E., eds. Urartu: Doğu'da Değişim/Transformation in the East. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, pp. 12–55.Google Scholar
Köroğlu, K. & Yumruk, Ş. 2014. Ergani/Gisgis (Kesentaş) Yeni Assur Kabartması. Türk Eskiçağ Bilimleri Enstitüsü Haberler, 38: 2–8.Google Scholar
Kozbe, G. 2010. The Neo-Assyrian Burials Recovered at Kavuşan Höyük in the Upper Tigris Region. In: Matthiae, P., Pinnock, F., Nigro, L. & Marchetti, N., eds. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East, May, 5th–10th 2008, ‘Sapienza’—Università di Roma. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, pp. 349–56.Google Scholar
Kreppner, F.J. 2008. Eine außergewöhnliche Brandbestattungssitte in Dūr-Katlimmu während der ersten Hälfte des ersten Jts. v. Chr. In: Bonatz, D., Czichon, R.M. & Kreppner, F.J., eds. Fundstellen: gesammelte Schriften zur Archäologie und Geschichte Altvorderasiens ad honorem Hartmut Kühne. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 263–76.Google Scholar
Kroll, S., Gruber, C., Hellwag, U., Roaf, M. & Zimansky, P. 2012. Introduction. In: Kroll, S., Gruber, C., Hellwag, U., Roaf, M. & Zimansky, P., eds. Biainili-Urartu: The Proceedings of the Symposium Held in Munich 12–14 October 2007/Tagungsbericht des Münchner Symposiums 12.–14. Oktober 2007. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Liverani, M. 1992. Studies on the Annals of Ashurnasirpal II 2: Topographical Analysis. Roma: Università di Roma ‘La Sapienza’.Google Scholar
MacGinnis, J. 2012a. Evidence for a Peripheral Language in a Neo-Assyrian Tablet from the Governor's Palace in Tuşhan. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 71 (1): 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGinnis, J. 2012b. Population and Identity in the Assyrian Empire: A Case Study. In: Cetrez, Ö.A., Donabed, S.G. & Makko, A., eds. The Assyrian Heritage: Threads of Continuity and Influence. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet, pp. 131–53.Google Scholar
Matney, T. 2010. Material Culture and Identity: Assyrians, Aramaeans, and the Indigenous Peoples of Iron Age Southeastern Turkey. In: Steadman, S.R. & Ross, J.C., eds. Agency and Identity in the Ancient Near East. New Paths Forward. London: Equinox, pp. 129–47.Google Scholar
Matney, T., Rainville, L., Demko, T., Kayser, S., Köroğlu, K., McDonald, H., MacGinnis, J., Nicoll, K., Parpola, S., Reimann, M., Roaf, M., Schmidt, P. & Szuchman, J. 2005. Archaeological Investigations at Ziyaret Tepe, 2003–2004. Anatolica, 31: 19–68.Google Scholar
Matney, T., Greenfield, T., Hartenberger, B., Keskin, A., Köroğlu, K., MacGinnis, J., Monroe, M.W., Rainville, L., Shepperson, M., Vorderstrasse, T. & Wicke, D. 2009. Excavations at Ziyaret Tepe 2007–2008. Anatolica, 35: 37–84.Google Scholar
Matney, T., Köroğlu, K., MacGinnis, J. & Wicke, D. 2013. Ziyaret Tepe/Tushan'da Arkeolojik Araştırmalara Bir Bakış/Overview of Archaeological Invertigations at Ziyaret Tepe/Tushan. In: Müdürlüğü, K.V.v.M.G. & Müdürlüğü, D.M., eds. Ilısu Barajı ve Hes Projesi Arkeolojik Kazıları 2004–2008 Çalışmaları/The Ilısu Dam and Hep Project Excavations Season 2004–2008. Diyarbakır: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Kültür Varlıkları ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü, pp. 303–30.Google Scholar
Melikishvili, G.A. 1960. Urartskie Klinoobraznye Nadpisi. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Moorey, P.R.S. 1980. Cemeteries of the First Millennium BC at Deve Hüyük, Near Carchemish. Salvaged by T.E. Lawrence and C.L. Woolley in 1913 (with a Catalogue Raisonné of the Objects in Berlin, Cambridge, Liverpool, London and Oxford). British Archaeological Reports International Series, 87. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Müller, U. 2005. Norşun Tepe and Lidar Höyük. Two Examples for Cultural Change during the Early Iron Age. In: Çilingiroğlu, A. & Darbyshire, G., eds. Anatolian Iron Ages V. Proceedings of the Fifth Anatolian Iron Ages Colloquium Held at Van, 6–10 August 2001. London: British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, pp. 107–14.Google Scholar
Oates, J. & Oates, D. 2001. Nimrud: An Assyrian Imperial City Revealed. London: British School of Archaeology in Iraq.Google Scholar
Oded, B. 1979. Mass Deportations and Deportees in the Neo-Assyrian Empire. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Öğün, B. 1978. Die urartäischen Besstattungsbräuche. In: Şahin, S., Schwertheim, E. & Wagner, J., eds. Studien zur Religion und Kultur Kleinasiens: Festschrift für Friedrich Karl Dörner zum 65. Geburtstag am 28. Februar 1976. Leiden: E.J. Brill, pp. 639–78.Google Scholar
Ökse, A.T. & Görmüş, A. 2009. Nomadic Way of Life in the Early Iron Age: A Study on the Evidence from Salat Tepe in the Upper Tigris Region. In: Oniz, H., ed. SOMA 2008, Proceedings of the XII Symposium on Mediterranean Archaeology, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, North Cyprus, 5–8 March 2008. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1909. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 165–72.Google Scholar
Ökse, A.T., Erdoğan, N., Görmüş, A. & Atay, E. 2014. Ilısu Barajı İnşaat Sahası Kurtarma Projesi: Demir Çağı/Salvage Project of the Construction Area of the Ilısu Dam I: The Iron Age. Mardin: Mardin Müzesi.Google Scholar
Parker, B.J. 2001. The Mechanics of Empire, The Northern Frontier of Assyria as a Case Study in Imperial Dynamics. Helsinki: The Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project.Google Scholar
Parpola, S. 2008. Cuneiform Texts from Ziyaret Tepe (Tuşhan), 2002–2003. State Archives of Assyria Bulletin, 17: 1–113.Google Scholar
Radner, K. 2011. Assyrians and Urartians. In: Steadman, S.R. & McMahon, G., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Anatolia 10,000–323 B.C.E. Oxford: Oxford University, pp. 734–51.Google Scholar
Roaf, M. 2001. Continuity and Change from the Middle to the Late Assyrian Period. In: Eichmann, R. & Parzinger, H., eds. Migration und Kulturtransfer: der Wandel vorder-und zentralasiatischer Kulturen im Umbruch vom 2. zum 1. vorchristlichen Jahrtausend: Akten des Internationalen Kolloquiums, Berlin, 23. bis 26. November 1999. Bonn: Habelt, pp. 357–69.Google Scholar
Roaf, M. & Schachner, A. 2005. The Bronze Age to Iron Age Transition in the Upper Tigris Region: New Information from Ziyaret Tepe and Giricano. In: Çilingiroğlu, A. & Darbyshire, G., eds. Anatolian Iron Ages V. Proceedings of the Fifth Anatolian Iron Ages Colloquium Held at Van, 6–10 August 2001. London: British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, pp. 115–23.Google Scholar
Salvini, M. 1995. Geschichte und Kultur der Urartäer. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Salvini, M. 2008. Corpus dei testi Urartei. Le iscrizioni su pietra e roccia. Testi. Roma: CNR—Istituto di studi sulle civiltà dell'Egeo e del Vicino Oriente.Google Scholar
Schachner, A. 2009. Assyriens Könige an einer der Quellen des Tigris. Archaeologische Forschungen im Höhlensystem von Bırkleyn und am sogenannten Tigris-Tunnel. Tübingen: Ernst Wastmuth.Google Scholar
Sevin, V. 1980. Van Kalesi'nden Bir Kaya Mezarı ve Urartular'da Ölü Yakma Geleneği/A Rock Cut Columbarium from Van Kale and the Urartian Cremation Rite. Anadolu Araştırmaları, 8: 151–66.Google Scholar
Sevin, V. 1987. Urartu Oda-Mezar Mimarisinin Kökeni Üzerine Bazı Gözlemler. In: Çilingiroğlu, A., ed. Anadolu Demir Çağları. Anatolian Iron Ages. 24–27 Nisan 1984 tarihleri arasında İzmir'de yapılan I. Anadolu Demir Çağları Sempozyumuna sunulan bildiriler. Papers presented to the I. Anatolian Iron Ages Symposium, Izmir during 24th–27th April 1984. İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi yayınları, pp. 35–55.Google Scholar
Sevin, V. 2012. Van Kalesi. Urartu Kral Mezarları ve Altıntepe Halk Mezarlığı. İstanbul: Ege yayınları.Google Scholar
Tarhan, M.T. 1980. Urartu Devleti'nin ‘Kuruluş’ Evresi ve Kurucu Krallardan ‘Lutipri=Lapturi’ Hakkında Yeni Görüşler. Anadolu Araştırmaları, 8: 69–114.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.G. 1865. Travels in Kurdistan, with Notices of the Sources of the Eastern and Western Tigris, and Ancient Ruins in Their Neighbourhood. Journal of the Royal Geographical Society of London, 35: 21–58.Google Scholar
Tekin, H. 2006. Yatay Oluk Bezekli Bir Seramik Grubunun Ele Geçtiği Yeni Bir Merkez: Hakemi Use. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23 (1): 151–72.Google Scholar
Tenu, A. 2009. Assyrians and Arameans in the Euphrates Valley Viewed from the Cemetery of Tell Shiukh Fawqani (Syria). Syria, 86: 83–96.Google Scholar
van Loon, M.N. 1974. The Euphrates Mentioned by Sarduri II of Urartu. In: Bittel, K., Cate, P.H.J.H.t. & Reiner, E., eds. Anatolian Studies Presented to H.G. Güterbock on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday. İstanbul: Nederlands Historisch-Archaeologisch Instituut, pp. 187–94.Google Scholar
Wicke, D. 2013. Itti nišē kurAššur amnūšunūti. ‘Zu den Leuten Assyriens zählte ich sie’. Beobachtungen zum kulturellen Austausch am Oberen Tigris in neuassyrischer Zeit. In: Kämmerer, T.R. & Rogge, S., eds. Patterns of Urban Societies. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, pp. 233–54.Google Scholar
Wicke, D. & Greenfield, T. 2013. The ‘Bronze Palace’ at Ziyarettepe: Preliminary Remarks on the Architecture and Faunal Analysis. In: Kertai, D. & Miglus, P.A., eds. New Research on Late Assyrian Palaces. Conference at Heidelberg January Second, 2011. Heidelberg: Heidelberger Orientverlag, pp. 63–124.Google Scholar
Winn, M.N. 1980. The Early Iron Age Pottery. In: van Loon, M.N., ed. Korucutepe 3. Final Report on the Excavations of the Universities of Chicago, California (Los Angeles) and Amsterdam in the Keban Reservoir, Eastern Anotalia (1968–1978), Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 155–75.Google Scholar
Zimansky, P.E. 1985. Ecology and Empire: The Structure of the Urartian State. Chicago: The Oriental Institute Press.Google Scholar
Zimansky, P.E. 1995. The Urartian Frontier as an Archaeological Problem. In: Liverani, M., ed. Neo-Assyrian Geography. Roma: Università di Roma ‘La Sapienza’, pp. 171–80.Google Scholar
Zimansky, P.E. 2011. Urartu ve Çağdaşları/Urartu and its Contemporaries. In: Köroğlu, K. & Konyar, E., eds. Urartu: Doğu'da Değişim/Transformation in the East. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, pp. 106–26.Google Scholar