No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Is archaeology only ideologically biased rhetoric? A report of WAC Inter-Congress on the Destruction and Conservation of Cultural Property, Brač, Croatia, May 1998
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Congress review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1998 Sage Publications
References
Bernbeck, R. and Pollock, S., 1996. Ayodhya, Archaeology, and Identity. Current Anthropology
37, Supplement: February. 138–42.Google Scholar
Bernbeck, R. and Sommer, U., 1994. Politik, Mythos und Archäologie: Der World Archaeological Congress 3 in New Delhi 1994 und Ayodhya. Etnographisch-Archäologische Zeitschrift
35: 475–98.Google Scholar
Boylan, Paul, 1993. Review of the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Brodie, Neil, 1998. The antiquities trade in the United Kingdom: recent developments. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Čače, S., Forenbaher, S. and Gaffney, V., 1998. Cultural resource management issues in the Adriatic Islands Project. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Cleere, Henry, 1998. The uneasy bedfellows: University and cultural heritage. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Edwards, John, 1998. The use of worship in Roman and Medieval Córdoba. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Eze-Uzomaka, Pamela, 1998. Archaeology and conflict with indigenous peoples in South East Nigeria. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Funari, P.P.A., 1998. Destruction and conservation of cultural property in Brazil: academic and practical challenges. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Gauch, Sarah, 1998. Everything old is new again, faulty restoration is endangering Egypt's ancient treasures. Newsweek, June 1: 19.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, (1976 [1974]). ‘Die Rolle der Philosophie im Marxismus’. In Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus: 49–59. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
Hassan, Fekri, 1998. Ethics, empirical adequacy and multivocality in Archaeology. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Holtorf, Cornelius, 1998a. Is the past a non-renewable resource?
Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Holtokf, Cornelius, 1998b. A brief report about the WAC (World Archaeological Congress) Inter-Congress on ‘The Destruction and Conservation of Cultural Property’ on the Island of Brač in Croatia, 3–7 May 1998. Arch-Theory
12 (5). [http://www.mailbase.ac.uk/lists/arch-theory/1998-05/0052.html]Google Scholar
Jones, Siǎn, 1997. The Archaeology of Ethnicity, Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Khan, Majeed, 1998. Ethno-religious violence towards cultural heritage. Brač WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Krishnan, Y., 1998. Destruction of cultural property in Tibet after the Chinese invasion of 1950. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Marchand, Suzanne, 1996. Down from Olympus. Archaeology and Philhellenism in Germany, 1750–1970. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbunwe-Samba, Patrick, 1998. Should developing countries also conserve and restore cultural property?
A point of view from Cameroon. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Ogundele, S. Oluwde, 1998. Archaeology in a developing geo-polity: the Nigerian experience. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Olsen, Bjørnar, 1998. The end of what? History and identity in a post-modern world. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Pachauri, S.K., 1998. Destruction of historical sites and monuments by human and other agencies and their preservation. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Podgorny, Irina, 1996. El tercer Congreso Arqueológico Mundial en Nueva Delhi y los límites de la ingenuidad postmoderna. Relaciones de la Sociedad Argentina de Anthopología, 21: 103–117.Google Scholar
Rao, Nandini, 1995. Politics and the World Archaeological Congress −3, Trabajos de Prehistoria, 52, 1:5–11, Madrid, Centro de Estudios Históricos, CSIC.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J., 1994. Archaeological Congress: Not a total disaster. The Hindustan Times, December 20: 13.Google Scholar
Ronayne, Maggie, 1998. Towards an ethical understanding of archaeological practices. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Shrimali, Krishna M., 1998. Ayodhya archaeology: from imbroglio to resolution. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Stewart, Charles, 1998. Immanent or eminent domain?
The contest over Thessaloniki's rotunda. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Šulc, Branka, 1998. The destruction of cultural property in war. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 1998. WAC history and policies. Vitória, April, unpublished conference lecture.Google Scholar
Tierney, M., 1995. WAC 3 and the role of archaeologists as intellectuals. WAC News, 3 (1):ii–iii.Google Scholar
Trotzig, Gustav, 1998. As good as old/new: problems of adjusting the modern archaeological heritage to modern society. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Ucko, Peter, 1987. Academic freedom and Apartheid. The Story of the World Archaeological Congress. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Vjesnik, L., 1998. St Lawrence reborn and Vukovar Fresco preserved only in Fragments. Croatia Weekly January 15, 1 (1): last page.Google Scholar
Wijesuriya, Gamini, 1998. Pious vandals – restoration versus destruction. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar