Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:37:34.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Jettböle middle Neolithic site on the Åland Islands – human remains, ancient DNA and pottery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Anders Götherström*
Affiliation:
Stockholm University, Sweden
Niklas Stenbäck
Affiliation:
Stockholm University, Sweden
Jan Storå
Affiliation:
Stockholm University, Sweden

Abstract

The article focuses on problems in making generalizations about the character of Stone Age sites and the difficulties of separating sacred and secular remains. Like many other Pitted Ware sites, the middle Neolithic site of Jettböle on the Åland Islands has been characterized as a settlement site despite finds of a ritual character. This study investigates the spatial relationships and depositional patterns of different find categories, with a special focus on human remains, including DNA analysis and the ornamentation of pottery from one of the larger excavation units from the site. The character and meaning of the site seem to be more complex than previously considered. The results of the study stress the need for careful investigation of the contextual circumstances of finds before making general interpretations.

Cet article met en évidence d'un côté les problemes survenant lorsqu'on veut généraliser le caractère des sites néolithiques et d'autre part la difficulté de faire un distinction entre les restes sacrés et les restes profanes. Comme beaucoup d'autres sites de la culture de la céramique à dépressions, le site du néolithique moyen de Jettböle sur les îles de Aland a été classifié comme habitation malgré les trouvailles de caractère rituel.

Les différentes trouvailles ont été examinées en fonction de leur relation spatiale et de la manière dont elles ont été déposées en se concentrant notamment sur les restes humains (analyses du DNA) et sur le décor de la poterie originaire d'une des plus grandes sections de fouille du site. Il semble que le caractère de même que la signification du site sont plus complexes qu'on ne l'avait pensé auparavant. Les résultats de cette étude soulignent le besoin d'examiner attentivement les circonstances contextuelles des trouvailles avant de se lancer dans des interprétations générales.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Die vorliegende Untersuchung widmet sich der Problematik der Verallgemeinerungen zu Merkmalen steinzeitlichen Siedlungen und den Schwierigkeiten, rituelle und profane Funde und Befunde voneinander zu trennen.

Wie viele andere Fundplätze der Grübchenkeramik hat auch der mittelneolithische Fundplatz von Jettböle auf den Åland-Inseln Funde rituellen Charakters erbracht. Die Studie untersucht unter besonderer Berücksichtigung menschlicher Überreste, DNA und der Keramikverzierungen, die aus einem größeren Ausgrabungskomplex stammen, die räumlichen Verbindungen und Deponierungsmuster verschiedener Fundkategorien. Charakter und Bedeutung des Fundplatzes erwiesen sich dabei komplexer, als vorher angenommen. Die Ergebnisse der Studie betonen die besondere Notwendigkeit einer sorgfältigen Untersuchung des Fundkontext, die vor generellen Interpretationen erfolgen sollte.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 Sage Publications 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ailio, J., 1909. Die Steinzeitliche Wohnplatzfunde in Finnland I-II. Helsinki: Helsingfors Centraldruckerei.Google Scholar
Almgren, O., 1906a. Uppländska stenåldersboplatser I, Läge och naturförhållanden. Fornvännen 1:119.Google Scholar
Almgren, O., 1906b. Uppländska stenåldersboplatser II, Inbyggarnes kultur. Fornvännen 1:101118.Google Scholar
Andersen, N.H., 1997. The Sarup enclosures: Funnel Beaker Culture of the Sarup site including two camps compared to the contemporary settlements in the area and other European enclosures (vol. 1). Jysk Arkœologisk Selskabs Skrifter 33:1.Google Scholar
Andersson, C., 1998. Kontinuitet i de mellanneolitiska samhällsstrukturerna. Aktuell Arkeologi VI. Stockholm: Stockholm Archaeological Reports 35.Google Scholar
Apel, J.-E. et al., 1995. Fågelbacken och trattbägarsamhället — samhälls-organisation och rituella samlingsplatser vid övergången till bofast tillvaro i östra Mellansverige. Tor 27:47132.Google Scholar
Bagge, A., 1951. Fagervik. Ein Rückgrat für die Periodeneinteilung der ostschwedische Wohnplatz- und Bootaxtkulturen aus dem Mittel-neolithikum. Acta Archaeologica (Kopenhamn) XXII:57118.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 1993. Altering the Earth. The Origins of Monuments in Britain and Continental Europe. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquities of Scotland.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 1996. Long houses, long mounds and the Neolithic enclosures. Journal of Material Culture 1:239256.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C., 2000. OxCal 3.4 software.Google Scholar
Burenhult, G., 1997. Gravarnas vittnesbörd. In Burenhult, G. (ed.), Ajvide och den moderna arkeologin. Falköping: Natur och Kultur.Google Scholar
Carlsson, A., 1987. Three Stone Age cultures in the province of Södermanland, eastern central Sweden – fact or fiction? Theoretical Approaches to Artefacts, Settlement and Society. Studies in Honour of Mats P. Malmer. Oxford: BAR International Series 366.Google Scholar
Carlsson, A., 1998. Tolkande arkeologi och svensk forntidshistoria. Stenåldern. Stockholm Studies in Archaeology 17. Kristianstad: Kristianstads Boktryckeri AB.Google Scholar
Cederhvarf, B., 1912. Neolitiska lerfigurer från Åland. Finska Fornminnes-föreningens tidskrift 26:307322.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. and Poinar, H., 1994. Contamination and negative results in ancient DNA studies and amber research. Ancient DNA Newsletter 2:57.Google Scholar
During, E. 1986. The fauna of Alvastra. An osteological analysis of animal bones from a Neolithic pile dwelling. Stockholm Studies in Archaeology 6. Offprint from OSSA vol. 12, supplement 1.Google Scholar
Edgren, T., 1992. Den förhistoriska tiden. Finlands historia 1. Espoo: Schildts.Google Scholar
Edmonds, M., 1993. Interpreting causewayed enclosures in the past and the present. In Tilley, C. (ed.), Interpretative Archaeology: 99142. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Gill, A., 1998. Neolitiska kulturer i Östra Mellansverige - en kritik. Aktuell Arkeologi VI. Stockholm: Stockholm Archaeological Reports 35.Google Scholar
Götherström, A., Lidén, K., Ahlström, T., Källersjö, M. and Brown, T.A., 1997. Osteology DNA and sex identification: Morphological and molecular sex identifications of five Neolithic individuals from Ajvide, Gotland. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 7:7181.Google Scholar
Grönroos, H., 1913. Stenåldersskelettfynden vid Jettböle på Åland; några uppgifter om de äldsta kända inbyggarne i Finland. Finska Läkaresällskapets handlingar 55:393407. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Hallgren, F., Djerw, U., Af Geijerstam, M. and Steineke, M., 1997. Skogsmossen, an early Neolithic settlement site, and offering fen, in the northern borderland of the Funnel Beaker Culture. Tor 29.Google Scholar
Holland, M.M., et al., 1993. Mitochondrial DNA sequences analysis of human skeletal remains: identification of remains from the Vietnam war. Journal of Forensic Sciences 38:542553.Google Scholar
Hulthén, B., 1998. The Alvastra Pile-Dwelling Pottery: An Attempt to Trace the Society Behind the Sherds. The Museum of National Antiquities, Stockholm, Monographs 5. Lund: Keramiska forskningslaboratoriet.Google Scholar
Hummel, S. and Herrmann, B., 1991. Y-Chromosomal-specific DNA amplified in ancient human bone. Naturwissenschaft 78:266267.Google Scholar
Janzon, G.O., 1974. Gotlands mellanneolitiska gravar. Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis. Studies in North-European Archaeology 6. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, A.J., Allen, M.J., Hagelberg, E. and Sonneberg, A., 1992. Identification of the skeletal remains of Josef Mengele by DNA analysis. Forensic Science International 56:6576.Google Scholar
Jobling, M.A., Pandya, A. and Tyler-Smith, C., 1997. The Y chromosome in forensic analysis and paternity testing. International Journal of Legal Medicine 110:118124.Google Scholar
Jobling, M.A. and Tyler-Smith, C., 1996. Fathers and sons - the Y chromosome and human evolution. Trends in Genetics 11:449455.Google Scholar
Karsten, P., 1994. Att kasta yxan i sjön. En studie över rituell tradition och förändring utifrån skånska neolitiska offerfynd. Acta Archaeologica Lundensia Ser. prima in 8 No 23. Lund: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Kaul, F., 1992. Ritualer med menneskeknogler i yngre stenalder. KUML 1991–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayser, M. et al., 1997. Evaluation of Y-chromosomal STRs: a multicenter study. Journal of Legal Medicine 110:125133.Google Scholar
Knutsson, H., 1995. Slutvandrat? Aspekter på övergången från rörlig till bofast tillvaro. Aun 20. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Kogan, S.C., Doherty, M., and Gitschier, J. 1987. An improved method for prenatal diagnosis of genetic diseases by analysis of amplified DNA sequences. The New England Journal of Medicine 317:985990.Google Scholar
Kurosaki, K., Matsushita, T. and Ueda, S., 1993. Individual DNA identification from ancient human remains. American Journal of Human Genetics 53:638643.Google Scholar
Lidén, K., Núñez, M. and Nelson, E., 1995. Diet and nutritional stress in a subneolithic population from the Åland Islands. An analysis of stable carbon isotopes and pathological traits. Arkœologiske Rapporter fra Esbjerg Museum 1. Esbjerg.Google Scholar
Lidén, K., Götherstrom, A. and Eriksson, G., 1997. Diet, gender and rank. Iskos 11. Proceedings of the VII Nordic Conference on the Application of Scientific Methods in Archaeology: 158164. Savonlinna, Finland, 7–11 September 1997. Helsinki: Vammalan Kirjapaino OY.Google Scholar
Lindqvist, C., 1988. A carbonized cereal grain (Hordeum sp.) and faunal remains of e.g. harp seal (Phoca groenlandica), cod (Gadus morhua) and herring (Clupea larengus), from the Kolsvidja upper stone age habitation site on Åland. Finskt Museum 95:540.Google Scholar
Lindqvist, C. and Possnert, G., 1997. The subsistence economy and diet at Jakobs/Ajvide, Eksta parish and other prehistoric dwelling and burial sites on Gotland in long-term perspective. In Göran, Burenhult (ed.), Remote Sensing, Applied Techniques for the Study of Cultural Resources and the Localization, Identification and Documentation of Sub-surface Prehistoric Remains in Swedish Archaeology. Volume I: Osteo-anthropological, economic, environ-mental and technical analyses: 29–90. Theses and Papers in North-European Archaeology 13a. Hässleholm: Exakta Offset AB.Google Scholar
Lyman, R.L., 1994 Quantitative units and terminology in zooarchaeology. American Antiquity 59:3671.Google Scholar
Meinander, C.F., 1957. Kolsvidja. Finska Fornminnesföreningens tidskrift 58:185213.Google Scholar
Meinander, C.F., 1962. Smikärr. Finskt Museum: 538.Google Scholar
Núñez, M., 1986a. Om bosättningen på Ålandsöarna under stenåldern. Åländsk Odling 46:13–28. Mariehamn.Google Scholar
Núñez, M., 1986b. Clay figurines from Åland and mainland Finland. Fennoscandia Archaeologica 3:1734.Google Scholar
Núñez, M., 1987. Åländska lerfigurer, skinnkläder och masker för 4000 ådr sedan. Åländsk Odling 47:716. Mariehamn.Google Scholar
Núñez, M., 1995. Cannibalism on Pitted Ware Åland? Karhunhammas 16. Turku.Google Scholar
Núñez, M., and Lidén, K., 1997. Taking the 5000 year old 'Jettböle skeletons' out of the closet. A palaeo-medical examination of human remains from the Åland (Ahvenanmaa) Islands. International Journal of Circumpolar Health 56:3039.Google Scholar
Olsson, E., 1996. Neolitikum i Stockholms län - kallmaterial och forskningsläge. Stenålder i Stockholms län. Två seminarier vid Stockholms läns museum. Stockholm: Gotab.Google Scholar
Olsson, E., and Edenmo, R., 1997. Gropkeramikerna – fanns de? östra Mellansverige. Regionalt och interregionalt. Stenåldersundersökningar i Syd- och Mellansverige. Riksantikvarieämbetet Arkeologiska undersökningar Skrifter 23:168197.Google Scholar
Olsson, E., Granath Zillén, G. and Mohr, A., 1994. Korsnäs. En gropkeramisk grav- och boplats på Södertörn. UV Stockholm rapport 63. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Ramos, M.D., 1995. Amplifying dinudeotide microsatellite loci from bone and tooth samples of up to 5000 years of age: more inconsistency than usefulness. Human Genetics 96:205212.Google Scholar
Stenbäck, N., 1998. Gropkeramiken på Åland. Förändringar i materiell kultur i början av mellanneolitikum. Aktuell arkeologi VI. Stockholm Archaeological Reports 35. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Stenberger, M., Dahr, E. and Munthe, H., 1943. Das Grabfeld von Västerbjers auf Gotland. Stockholm: Wahlstöm & Widstrand.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 1991. Rethinking the Neolithic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 1996. Neolithic houses in mainland Britain and Ireland - a sceptical view. In Darvill, T. and Thomas, J. (eds) Neolithic Houses in Northwest Europe and Beyond: 112. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Tilley, C., 1996. An Ethnography of the Neolithic. Early Prehistoric Societies in Southern Scandinavia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ubelaker, D.H., 1978. Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Von Bonsdorff, P., 1933. De äldsta tandfynden i Finland. Skandinaviska Tandläkarfireningens 25:te möte i Helsingfors den 5–7 juli 1932:1–18. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Welinder, S., 1976. Åländsk fångststenålder. Åländsk Odling 36:3658. Mariehamn.Google Scholar
Whittle, A., 1996. Europe in the Neolithic. The Creation of New Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winge, H., n.d. Knogler fra en stenalderbopladts vid Jettböle, Åland. Unpublished report in Archives of Ålands Museum, Mariehamn.Google Scholar
Wyszomirska, B., 1984. Figurplastik och gravskick hos Nord- och Nordösteuropas neolitiska fångstkulturer. Acta Archaeologica Lundensia Ser A 17. Lund.Google Scholar