Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:29:21.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Milk Jugs’ and Other Myths of the Copper Age of Central Europe’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Oliver E. Craig*
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle, UK
John Chapman*
Affiliation:
University of Durham, UK
András Figler
Affiliation:
Hanság Müzeum, Mosonmagyaróvár, Hungary
Pál Patay
Affiliation:
Magyar Nemzeti Múzeum, Budapest, Hungary
Gillian Taylor*
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle, UK
Matthew J. Collins*
Affiliation:
University of York, UK

Abstract

Ceramics were subjected to organic residue analysis from two collections: a series of middle Copper Age (Bodrogkeresztúr) vessels hitherto known as ‘milk jugs’, curated in the Magyar Nemzeti Múzeum, Budapest, and a collection of early Baden (Boleráz) vessels from the recently discovered settlement of Gyo”r-Szabadrét-domb, in western Hungary. The aim of the analyses was to establish whether or not these vessels, often associated with milk based on typological criteria, were actually used to process, store or serve dairy products. The results of the analyses revealed that no dairy products could be securely identified in the so-called ‘milk jugs’. Nevertheless dairy products were identified in other vessel types.

Résumé

Résumé

Une analyse de résidus organiques fut effectuée sur les ceramiques de deux séries, à savoir une collection de récipients de l'âge du cuivre moyen (Bodrogkeresztùr), jusqu'ici connus sous le nom de «pots de lait» et conservés au musée Magyar Nemzeti de Budapest ainsi qu'une collection de récipients du début de la période de Baden (Boleràz) et provenant du village récemment découvert de Győr-Szabadrét-domb, en Hongrie occidentale. Le but de cette analyse est de savoir si oui ou non ces vases, qui, d'après leurs caractères typologiques sont souvent associés au lait, étaient effectivement utilisés pour traiter, conserver ou servir des produits laitiers. Les résultats de l'analyse montrèrent qu'aucun produit laitier n'a pu être identifié avec certitude dans les soi-disant «pots de lait». Néanmoins, des produits laitiers furent reconnus dans d'autres types de récipients.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Die keramischen Gefäße zweier Sammlungen wurden einer Analyse organischer Rückstände unterzogen. Dabei handelte es sich um eine Serie mittelkupferzeitlicher (Bodrogkeresztúr) Gefäße, die bislang unter dem Begriff “Milchkrüge” bekannt geworden sind, aus den Beständen des Magyar Nemzeti Múzeum Budapest sowie eine Kollektion von Behältnissen der frühen Badener Kultur (Boleráz) aus der kürzlich entdeckten Siedlung von Győr-Szabadrét-domb in Westungarn. Das Ziel der Analysen war, festzustellen, ob diese Gefäße, die oft aufgrund typologischer Kriterien mit Milch in Verbindung gebracht werden, tatsächlich für die Herstellung, Lagerung oder den Ausschank von Milchprodukten genutzt wurden. Die Ergebnisse der Analysen zeigten, dass sich Milcherzeugnisse nicht mit Sicherheit in den sogenannten “Milchkannen” identifizieren ließen. Dennoch wurden Milchprodukte in anderen Gefäßtypen nachgewiesen.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 Sage Publications 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bella, L., 1923. A bodrogkeresztúri aeneolithkori temetői. Az Országos Régészeti Tarsult Évkönyve 1:718 and 213–214.Google Scholar
Bognár-Kutzian, I., 1963. The Copper Age Cemetery of Tiszapolgár-Bastanya. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Bogucki, P., 1984. The antiquity of dairying in temperate Europe. Expedition 28:5158.Google Scholar
Chapman, J., 1981. The Vinc̆a Culture of South East Europe. Studies in Chronology, Economy and Society. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 117).Google Scholar
Chapman, J., 1988. Ceramic production and social differentiation: the Dalmatian Neolithic and the western Mediterranean. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 1(2):325.Google Scholar
Chapman, J., 1994. The living, the dead and the ancestors: time, life-cycles and the mortuary domain in later European prehistory. In Davies, J. (ed.), Ritual and Remembrance: 4085. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, J., 1999. Powrót nad dunaj. V.G. Childe i archeologia osadnictwa w neolicie i epoce miedzi Europy Wschodniej. In Lech, J. (ed.), V Gordon Childe i archeologia w XX Wieku: 137148. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1939. The Dawn of European Civilization. 3rd edn London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1958. The Prehistory of European Society. Harmondsworth: Cassell.Google Scholar
Copley, M.S., Berstan, R., Dudd, S.N., Docherty, G., Murkherjee, A.J., Straker, V., Payne, S. and Evershed, R.P., 2003. Direct chemical evidence for widespread dairying in prehistoric Britain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100:15241529.Google Scholar
Craig, O.E. and Collins, M.J., 2000. An improved method for the immunological detection of mineral bound protein using hydrofluoric acid and direct capture. Journal of Immunological Methods 236:8997.Google Scholar
Craig, O.E., 2002. The Development of Dairying in Europe: potential evidence from food residues on ceramics. Documenta Prehistorica 29:97107.Google Scholar
Craig, O.E., Love, G.D., Isaksson, S., Taylor, G. and Snape, C.E., 2004. Stable carbon isotopic characterisation of free and bound lipids in archaeological ceramic vessels released by solvent extraction, alkaline saponification and catalytic hydropyrolysis. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 7:613634.Google Scholar
Craig, O.E., Taylor, G., Collins, M.J., Mulville, J. and Parker Pearson, M., in press. Identification of dairying in the Western Isles of Scotland. An integrated biomolecular approach. Journal of Archaeological Science.Google Scholar
Dudd, S.N., and Evershed, R.P., 1998. Direct demonstration of milk as an element of archaeological economies. Science 282:14781481.Google Scholar
Dudd, S.N., Evershed, R.P. and Gibson, A.M., 1999. Evidence for varying patterns of exploitation of animal products in different prehistoric pottery traditions based on lipids preserved in surface and absorbed residues. Journal of Archaeological Science 26:14731482.Google Scholar
Figler, A., Bartosiewicz, L., Fűleky, G., and Hertelendi, E., 1997. Copper Age settlement and the Danube water system: a case study from north-western Hungary. In Chapman, J. and Dolukhanov, P.M. (eds), Landscapes in Flux: 209230. Oxford: Oxbow Books (Colloquica Pontica).Google Scholar
Friedli, H., Lotscher, H., Oeschger, H., Siegenthaler, U. and Stauffer, B., 1986. Ice core record of the 13C/12C ratio of atmospheric CO2 in the past two centuries. Nature 324:237238.Google Scholar
Heron, C. and Evershed, R.P., 1993. The analysis of organic residues and the study of pottery use. Archaeological Method and Theory 5:247286.Google Scholar
Hillebrand, J., 1923. A bodrogkeresztári ásatásokról. Antropológiai Fiizetek 1:1215.Google Scholar
Hillebrand, J., 1927. A pusztaistvánházi rézkori temet8Ostörténeti jelent6séger61. Az Orszdgos Régészeti Tarsult Evkönyve 2:2440 and 364–365.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1990. The Domestication of Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kalicz, N., 1991. Beiträge zue Kenntnis der Kupferzeit im ungarischen Transdanubien. In Lichardus, J. (ed.), Die Kupferzeit als historische Epoche: 347387. Bonn: Habelt (Saarbrücker Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 55).Google Scholar
Kramer, C., 1985. Ceramic ethnoarchaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 14:77102.Google Scholar
Patay, P., 1961. A bodrogkeresztúri kultura temetői. Régészeti Füzetek 2, Ser. 10. Budapest.Google Scholar
Patay, P., 1974. Die hochkupferzeitliche Bodrogkeresztúr-Kultur. Bericht der Römisch-Germanisch Kommission 55:175.Google Scholar
Patay, P., 1984. Kupferzeitliche Meissel, Beile und Äxte in Ungarn. München: Beck (Prähistorische Bronzefunde IX, 15).Google Scholar
Pulszky, F., 1884. Die Kupferzeit in Ungarn. Budapest.Google Scholar
Rice, P.M., 1987. Pottery Analysis. A Sourcebook. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rómer, F., 1870. Két szabolcsmegyei őstemető és egyéb régészeti leletek. Archaeológiai Értesitő Ser. 1(3):217226.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A., 1981. Plough and pastoralism: aspects of the secondary products revolution. In Hodder, I., Isaac, G. and Hammond, N. (eds), Pattern of the Past: Studies in Honour of David Clarke: 261305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A., 1982–1983. The development of Neolithic and Copper Age settlement in the Great Hungarian Plain. Part 1: the regional setting. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 1(3):287316; Part 2: site surveys and settlement dynamics. 2(1):1341.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A., 1997. Economy and Society in Prehistoric Europe: Changing Perspectives. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, B., Heron, C., Serpico, M. and Bourriau, J., 2000. A comparison of methods for establishing fatty acid concentration gradients across potsherds: A case study using late Bronze Age Canaanite amphorae. Archaeometry 42:399414.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, R., 1970. Bread and milk and Bronze Age economies in South Italy. Antiquity 44:5456.Google Scholar
Whittle, A., 1996. Europe in the Neolithic: The Creation of New Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar