Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-dlb68 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-16T05:42:25.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monica Baggio, Elisa Bernard, Monica Salvadori and Luca Zamparo, eds. Anthropology of Forgery: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Archaeological Fakes (Antenor Quaderni 46. Padua: Padova University Press, 2019, 332 pp., b/w and colour illustr., ISBN 978-88-6938-154-6)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2020

Giulia Bison
Giulia Bison*
Affiliation:
Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali e per il Turismo, Italy/University of Leicester, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , November 2020 , pp. 631 - 635
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bottini, A. 2016. Antico ad ogni costo. In: Zuchtriegel, G., ed. Possessione: Trafugamenti e falsi di antichità a Paestum. Napoli: Arte'm, pp. 47–50.Google Scholar
Carabinieri. Comando tutela patrimonio artistico, Ministero per i beni e le attività culturali & Università degli Studi Roma Tre 2018. L'arte non vera non può essere arte: Atti del ciclo di conferenze promosse dal Comando Carabinieri TPC, in collaborazione con il Consiglio Nazionale Anticontraffazione (CNAC-MiSE), il Ministero per i beni e le attività culturali e l'Università degli Studi Roma Tre, ottobre-dicembre 2017. Roma: Edizioni Efesto.Google Scholar
Carabinieri. Comando Tutela Patrimonio Culturale 2019. Attività operativa [Accessed 13.07.2020]. Available at: http://tpcweb.carabinieri.it/SitoPubblico/pubblicazioniGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, J.M. 1992. The Aesthetics of the Forger: Stylistic Criteria in Ancient Art Forgery. Minerva, 3(3): 10–15.Google Scholar
Faude-Nagel, C. 2013. Kunstfälschung & Provenienzforschung am Beispiel von drei Fälschungen aus dem aktuellen Kunstmarkt. Mainz: Chorus.Google Scholar
Frieman, C. 2010. Imitation, Identity and, Communication: The Presence and Problems of Skeuomorphs in the Metal Ages. In: Eriksen, B.V., ed. Lithic Technology in Metal Using Societies. Højbjerg: Jutland Archaeological Society, pp. 33–44.Google Scholar
Grafton, A. 1990. Forgers and Critics: Creativity and Duplicity in Western Scholarship. London: Collins & Brown.Google Scholar
Jones, M. 1990. Introduction. In: Jones, M., Craddock, P. T., Barker, N. & Museum, British, eds. Fake? The Art of Deception. London: British Museum Publications, pp. 11–22.Google Scholar
Jones, M.; Craddock, P.T., Barker, N. & Museum, British, eds. 1990. Fake? The Art of Deception. London: British Museum Publications.Google Scholar
Lessing, A. 1965. What is wrong with a forgery? The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 23(4): 461–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuchâtel, S. & Kaeser, M. 2011. L’Âge du faux : L'authenticité en archéologie. Hauterive: Laténium.Google Scholar
Nagel, A. 2004. The Copy and Its Evil Twin: Thirteen Notes on Forgery. Brooklyn, NY: Immaterial Inc.Google Scholar