Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:30:31.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Complexity in the Mid-Holocene Northeastern Bothnian Gulf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

André Costopoulos ,
Samuel Vaneeckhout ,
Jari Okkonen ,
Eva Hulse ,
Ieva Paberzyte  and
Colin D. Wren
André Costopoulos
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, McGill University, Canada
Samuel Vaneeckhout*
Affiliation:
Archaeology Laboratory, Oulu University, Finland
Jari Okkonen*
Affiliation:
Archaeology Laboratory, Oulu University, Finland
Eva Hulse*
Affiliation:
Anthropology Department, University of Buffalo, USA
Ieva Paberzyte*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, McGill University, Canada
Colin D. Wren*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, McGill University, Canada
*
[email: samuel.vaneeckhout@gmail.com]
[email: jari.okkonen@oulu.fi]
[email: evahulse@gmail.com]
[email: ieva.paberzyte@mail.mcgill.ca]
[email: colin.wren@mail.mcgill.ca]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There was a period of reduced mobility, increased population density, and social complexity among hunter–gatherers in northern Bothnian prehistory between about 4050 and 2050 cal BC. We argue that this was made possible by a combination of physical and social factors that include the shortening of the coastline due to isostatic land uplift, the reduction of distances between major river mouths along the Bothnian coast, and the local variability in rate of shoreline displacement at individual river mouths.

Au courant de la préhistoire de la Bothnie septentrionale, à peu près entre 4050 et 2050 cal BC, existait une période de mobilité réduite ainsi que de densité de population et de complexité sociale croissantes. Nous soutenons que ceci était rendu possible par une combinaison de facteurs physiques et sociaux qui incluaient un raccourcissement du littoral dû à la surrection isostatique, la réduction des distances entre les embouchures principales le long de la côte bothnienne et la variabilité locale par rapport au déplacement de la côte près des embouchures des rivières individuelles. Translation by Isabelle Gerges.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

In der Vorgeschichte des Nordostens des Bottnischen Meerbusens, zwischen ungefähr 4050 und 2050 cal BC, existierte eine Periode verminderter Mobilität, erhöhter Bevölkerungsdichte und sozialer Komplexität. Wir behaupten, dass dies durch eine Kombination physischer und sozialer Faktoren, einschließlich der Verkürzung der Küstenlinie aufgrund iostatischer Landhebungen, der Verminderung der Entfernungen zwischen den großen Flussmündungen entlang der Bottnischen Küste und der lokalen Variabilität der Stärke der Küstenlinienverlagerung an bestimmten Flussmündungen ermöglicht wurde. Translation by Heiner Schwarzberg.

Keywords

social complexityHoloceneBothnian Gulfenvironmental changecomplexité socialeHolocèneGolfe de Bothniechangement environnementauxsoziale KomplexitätHolozänBottnischer MeerbusenUmweltveränderung
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , 2012 , pp. 41 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, G.N. & Milner, N.J. 2003. Coastal hunters and gatherers and social evolution: marginal or central? Before Farming: the Archaeology of Old World Hunter-Gatherers, 3-4(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
Blanton, R.E. 1994. Houses and Households: A Comparative Study. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Bracewell, J. 2011. Moving with the Times: A Case-Study of Adaptation to Changing Environmental Conditions in Coastal Northern Finland. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 26 (1): 7–22.Google Scholar
Broadbent, N. 1979. Coastal Resources and Settlement Stability. Uppsala: Uppsala University, Institute of North European Archaeology, Archaeological Studies.Google Scholar
Carpelan, C. 2001. Zur zeitgenössischen archäologischen Forschung in Finnland. Finnisch-Ugrischen Forschungen, 56: 254–354.Google Scholar
Carpelan, C. 2002. Esihistorian vuosiluvut, ajoitukset ja kronologia. In: Grünthal, R., ed. Ennen, muinoin. Miten menneisyyttämme tutkitaan. Helsinki: SKS, pp. 28–45.Google Scholar
Costopoulos, A. 2002. Evaluating the Chronological Context of a Prehistoric Copper Knife Find in Northern Finland. Faravid, 26: 13–19.Google Scholar
Costopoulos, A. 2003. Prehistoric Flint Provenance in Finland: Reanalysis of Southern Data, and Initial Results for the North. Fennoscandia Archaeologica, 20: 41–54.Google Scholar
Costopoulos, A. 2005. Two Multi-Room Neolithic Dwellings from Kierikki: Surprising Likeness, thought Provoking Differences. Faravid, 29: 5–17.Google Scholar
Coward, F., Shennan, S., Colledge, S., Conolly, J. & Collard, M. 2008. The Spread of Neolithic Plant Economies from the Near East to Northwest Europe: a Phylogenetic Analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35 (1): 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eronen, M. 2005. Land Uplift: Virgin Land from the Sea. In: Seppälä, M., ed. The Physical Geography of Fennoscandia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–34.Google Scholar
Europaeus, A. 1913. Paavolan pitäjän jättiläiskirkot’. Helsinki: Suomen muinais-muistoyhdistys, Suomen Museo 20.Google Scholar
Fitzhugh, B. 2003. The Evolution of Complex Hunter-Gatherers: Archaeological Evidence from the North Pacific. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
Franzen, P., Heinäaho, H. & Mäki-Petäys, M. 1998. Kaivauskertomus Yli-Ii, Karjalankylä, Voima-Kuusela. Kierikkiprojekti, Iin-ja Yli-Iin kansalaisopisto 1998 (unpublished excavation report, Oulu University).Google Scholar
Gkiasta, M., Russell, T., Shennan, S. & Steele, J. 2003. Neolithic Transition in Europe: The Radiocarbon Record Revisited. Antiquity, 77: 45–62.Google Scholar
Grabert, G.F. & Larsen, C.E. 1975. Marine Transgressions and Cultural Adaptation: Preliminary Tests of an Environmental Model. In: Fitzhugh, W., ed. Prehistoric Maritime Adaptations of the Circumpolar Zone. Chicago: Aldine, pp. 229–51.Google Scholar
Helskog, K. & Schweder, T. 1989. Estimating the Number of Contemporaneous Houses from C Dates. Antiquity, 63: 166–72.Google Scholar
Huggert, A. 1996. Early Copper Finds in Northern Fennoscandia. Current Swedish Archaeology, 4: 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, C.E. 2005. Rivers Draining into the Gulf of Bothnia. In: Seppälä, M., ed. The Physical Geography of Fennoscandia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 325–48.Google Scholar
Katiskoski, K. 2002. The Semisubterranean Dwelling at Kärmelahti in Puumala, Savo province, Eastern Finland. In: Ranta, H., ed. Huts and Houses: Stone Age and Early Metal Age Buildings in Finland. Helsinki: National Board of Antiquities, pp. 171–200.Google Scholar
Kelly, R.L. 1983. Hunter-Gatherer Mobility Strategies. Journal of Anthropological Research, 39 (3): 277–306.Google Scholar
Koivunen, P. 1996. Kodanpohja ja meripihkaa Kierikistä. Muinaistutkija, 1: 2–7.Google Scholar
Koivunen, P. & Makkonen, M. 1998. Yli-Iin Kierikin Kuuselankankaan kaivaukset 1993–94. Oulu: Oulu University, Meteli 16.Google Scholar
Koivunen, P. & Viljanmaa, S. 2004. Yli-Ii Purkajasuo YP-04. Kaivauskertomus (unpublished excavation report, Oulu).Google Scholar
Kotivuori, P. 1993. Selviytyjät. Näyttely Pohjoisen Ihmisen Sitkeydestä. Rovaniemi: Lapin Maakuntamuseon julkaisuja 7.Google Scholar
Lavento, M. & Hornytzkyj, S. 1995. On Asbestos used as Temper in Finnish Sub-Neolithic, Neolithic and Early Metal Period Pottery. Fennoscandia Archaeologica, 12: 71–75.Google Scholar
Nuñez, M. & Uino, P. 1997. Dwellings and Related Structures in Prehistoric Mainland Finland. Bebyggelsehistorisk Tidskrift, 33: 133–52.Google Scholar
Nuñez, N. 2004. All Quiet on the Eastern Front? In: Knutsson, H., ed. Coast to Coast: Arrival. Uppsala: Uppsala University, pp. 345–67.Google Scholar
Nuñez, N. & Okkonen, J. 1999. Environmental Background for the Rise and Fall of the Villages and Megastructures in North Ostrobothnia 4000–2000 cal BC. In: Huure, M., ed. Dig it All: Papers Dedicated to Ari Siiriäinen. Jyväskylä: Finnish Antiquarian Society, pp. 105–15.Google Scholar
Okkonen, J. 2003. Jättiläisen hautoja ja hirveitä kiviröykkiöitä – Pohjanmaan muinaisten kivirakennelmien arkeologiaa. Oulu: Oulu University, Acta Universitatis Ouluensis B 52.Google Scholar
Pesonen, P. 2002. Semi-Subterranean Houses in Finland – A Review. In: Ranta, H., ed. Huts and Houses: Stone Age and Early Metal Age Buildings in Finland. Helsinki: National Board of Antiquities, pp. 9–41.Google Scholar
Rankama, T. & Maijanen, H. 1999. Yli-Ii 43 Kuuselankangas. Kivikautisen asuinpaikan kaivaus 18. 29.5.1998 (unpublished excavation report, Oulu).Google Scholar
Schulz, H.P. 1997. IIjokilaaksoinventointi vällilä Purkajasuo-Pahkakoski (unpublished survey report, Oulu).Google Scholar
Schulz, H.P. 2000. Purkajasuon ja Purkajasuo/ Korvalan kaivaukset (unpublished excavation report, Oulu).Google Scholar
Siiriäinen, A. 1967. Yli-In Kierikki. Asbestikeraaminen asuinpaikka Pohjois-Pohjanmaalla. Suomen museo, 74: 5–37.Google Scholar
Sipilä, J. & Lahelma, A. 2007. War as a Paradigmatic Phenomenon: Endemic Violence and the Finnish Sub-Neolithic. In: Pollard, T. & Banks, I., eds. War and Sacrifice: Studies in the Archaeology of Conflict. Boston: Brill, pp. 189–209.Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G. 1990. Monumental Architecture: A Thermodynamic Explanation of Symbolic Behaviour. World Archaeology, 22: 119–32.Google Scholar
Tuovinen, T. 2002. The Burial Cairns and the Landscape in the Archipelago of Aboland, SW Finland, in the Bronze Age and the Iron Age. Oulu: Oulu University.Google Scholar
Vaneeckhout, S. 2008. Dwelling Depressions at Kierikki: Results of a GPS-Survey. Faravid, 32: 7–18.Google Scholar
Vaneeckhout, S. 2010. House Societies Among Coastal Hunter-Gatherers: a Case Study of Stone Age Ostrobothnia, Finland. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 43 (1): 12–25.Google Scholar
Zvelebil, M. 2006. Mobility, Contact, and Exchange in the Baltic Sea Basin 6000–2000 BC. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 25: 178–92.Google Scholar
Zvelebil, M. & Rowley-Conwy, P. 1984. Transition to Farming in Northern Europe: a Hunter-Gatherer Perspective. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 17: 104–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar