Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:09:05.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can the subaltern (in)securitize? A rejoinder to Claudia Aradau

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2018

Sarah Bertrand*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Junior-Senior Dialogue
Copyright
© British International Studies Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Judith Butler, as cited in: Claudia Aradau, ‘From securitization theory to critical approaches to (in)security’, European Journal of International Security, 3:3 (2018), pp. 300–05 (p. 302).

2 Butler, as cited in Aradau, ‘From securitization theory to critical approaches to (in)security’, p. 302.

3 See Banu Bargu, Starve and Immolate: The Politics of Human Weapons (New York: Columbia University Press, 2016); Banu Bargu, ‘The silent exception: Hunger striking and lip-sewing’, Law, Culture and the Humanities (2017), Online First, available at: doi:10.177/143872117709684.

4 See Lene Hansen’s point about the body and performativity: Lene Hansen, ‘The Little Mermaid’s silent security dilemma and the absence of gender in the Copenhagen School’, Millennium, 29:2 (2000), pp. 285–306.

5 Buzan, Barry and Hansen, Lene, The Evolution of International Security Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), p. 215 Google Scholar.