Article contents
The humanisation of security? Towards an International Human Protection Regime
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2016
Abstract
Over the past few decades, genocidal killing and other mass atrocities have become less frequent and less lethal. At the same time, collective international responses have become more common and more comprehensive. What explains these two phenomena, and are they connected? This article suggests that the evidence of declining mass violence and growing international activism is not only compelling but that the two phenomena are connected by the emergence of a new international human protection regime. The article proceeds in three parts. The first examines the evidence for thinking that the world is experiencing both a decline in mass violence and an increase in international activism in response to such violence. The second outlines the emergence, scope, and limits of the human protection regime. The third considers whether the regime itself is associated with the changing practices of third parties to mass violence. The fourth part contrasts this explanation with potential alternatives.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © British International Studies Association 2016
References
1 Pinker, Steven, The Better Angels of our Nature: The Decline of Violence in History and its Causes (New York: Allen Lane, 2011)Google Scholar.
2 The claim that the two are connected is not new, see Goldstein, Joshua, Winning the War on War: The Decline of Armed Conflict Worldwide (New York: Dutton, 2011)Google Scholar.
3 Ban Ki-moon, ‘Human Protection and the 21st Century United Nations’, Cyril Foster Lecture, University of Oxford, 2 February 2011, available at: {http://www.un.org/sg/selected-speeches/statement_full.asp?statID=1064} accessed 6 October 2015.
4 Young, Oran, ‘Regime dynamics: the rise and fall of international regimes’, International Organisation, 36:2 (1982), pp. 277–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 See Cronin, Bruce, Institutions for the Common Good: International Protection Regimes in International Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the role of practice in shaping norms and politics, see Adler, Emmanuel and Pouliot, Vincent, ‘International practices: Introduction and framework’, in Emmanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot (eds), International Practices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 See Hampson, Fen Osler, Daudelin, Jean, et al., Madness in the Multitude: Human Security and World Disorder (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar; Kaldor, Mary, Human Security (Cambridge: Polity, 2007)Google Scholar; and MacFarlane, S. Neil and Khong, Yuen Foong, Human Security and the UN: A Critical History (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2006)Google Scholar.
7 For this critique, see Paris, Roland, ‘Human security: Paradigm shift or hot air?’, International Security, 26:2 (2001), pp. 87–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 Pouliot, Vincent, International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Michael Ignatieff, ‘The new world disorder’, The New York Review of Books (25 September 2014), available at: {http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/sep/25/new-world-disorder/?pagination=false} accessed 15 December 2015; Doug Saunders, ‘Why Louise Arbour is thinking twice’, Globe and Mail (28 May 2015), available at: {http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/why-louise-arbour-is-thinking-twice/article23667013/} accessed 15 December 2015.
10 Seybolt, Taylor B., Aronson, Jay D., and Fischhoff, Baruch (eds), Counting Civilian Casualties: An Introduction to Recording and Estimating Nonmilitary Deaths in Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Rummel, R. J., Death by Government (Piscataway, NJ: Transaction, 1994)Google Scholar; Rummel, R. J., Statistics of Democide (Piscataway, NJ: Transaction, 1997)Google Scholar.
12 Valentino, Benjamin A., ‘Why we kill: the political science of political violence against civilians’, Annual Review of Political Science, 17 (2014), p. 100CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 Human Security Report, Human Security Report 2013: The Decline in Global Violence: Evidence, Explanation and Contestation (Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University, 2013), p. 107Google Scholar.
14 Human Security Report 2013, pp. 107–13.
15 Pinker, The Better Angels of our Nature, pp. 338–43.
16 Bellamy, Alex J., ‘Mass Atrocities and Armed Conflict: Links, Distinctions and Implications for the Responsibility to Protect’, Policy Analysis Brief for the Stanley Foundation (February 2011)Google Scholar; Bellamy, Alex J., Massacres and Morality: Mass Killing in an Age of Civilian Immunity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Valentino, Bejamin A. and Huth, Paul, ‘Mass killing of civilians in time of war’, in J. Joseph Hewitt, Jonathan Wilkenfield, and Ted Robert Gurr (eds), Peace and Conflict (Boulder, CO: Paradigm, 2008), pp. 79–92Google Scholar; and Straus, Scott, Making and Unmaking Nations: War, Leadership and Genocide in Modern Africa (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2015), pp. 96–97Google Scholar. Though Straus does not, himself, draw inferences about change over time, we can extrapolate this from his dataset (Table 4.2).
17 Ulfelder, Jay, ‘Genocide is going out of fashion’, Foreign Policy, 14 May (2015)Google Scholar.
18 Marshall, Monty G. and Cole, Benjamin R., Global Report 2014: Conflict, Governance and State Fragility (Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace, 2014), pp. 18–19Google Scholar.
19 See, for example, Thayer, Bradley, ‘Humans, not angels: Reasons to doubt the decline of war thesis’, International Studies Review, 15:3 (2013), pp. 411–416Google Scholar; Levy, Jack and Thompson, William R., ‘The decline of war? Multiple trajectories and diverging trends’, International Studies Review, 15:3 (2013), pp. 405–411Google Scholar. Debate does persist on the fact of the decline too, however. Douglas Fry suggests that human life prior to 10,000 BCE was largely warfare-free. See Fry, Douglas P., War, Peace and Human Nature: The Convergence of Evolutionary and Cultural Views (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
20 Schneider, Gerald and Bussmann, Margit, ‘Accounting for the dynamics of one-sided violence: Introducing KOSVED’, Journal of Peace Research, 50:5 (2013), pp. 635–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
21 True, Jacqui, ‘Winning the battle but losing the war on violence: a feminist perspective on the declining global violence thesis’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 17:4 (2015), pp. 554–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Davies, Sara E. and True, Jacqui, ‘Reframing conflict-related sexual and gender based violence: Bringing gender analysis back in’, Security Dialogue, 46:6 (2015), pp. 495–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 See, for example, Hehir, Aidan, ‘The Responsibility to Protect: Sound and fury signaling nothing’, International Relations, 24:2 (2010), pp. 218–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hehir, Aidan, ‘The permanence of inconsistency: Libya, the Security Council and the Responsibility to Protect’, International Security, 38:1 (2013), pp. 137–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Morris, Justin, ‘Libya and Syria: R2P and the spectre of the swinging pendulum’, International Affairs, 89:5 (2913), pp. 1265–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
23 Cases based on Bellamy, ‘Mass Atrocities and Armed Conflict’, and updated to take account of the most recent cases.
24 Bellamy, Massacres and Morality; Wheeler, Nicholas J., Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar.
25 Bellamy, Alex J., ‘When states go bad: the termination of state based mass atrocities’, Journal of Peace Research, 52:4 (2015), pp. 565–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar; de Waal, Alex and Conley-Zilkic, , ‘Reflections on how genocidal killings are brought to an end’, Social Science Research Council (22 December 2006)Google Scholar.
26 Weiss, Thomas G., ‘The sunset of humanitarian intervention? The Responsibility to Protect in a unipolar era’, Security Dialogue, 35:2 (2004), p. 135CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
27 Wheeler, Saving Strangers, pp. 143–4.
28 See Annan, Kofi, Interventions: A Life in War and Peace (New York: Penguin, 2013), pp. 81–134Google Scholar.
29 See Thakur, Ramesh, ‘R2P after Libya and Syria: Engaging emerging powers’, The Washington Quarterly, 36:2 (2013), pp. 61–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Weiss, Thomas G., ‘Military humanitarianism: Syria hasn’t killed it’, The Washington Quarterly, 37:1 (2014), pp. 7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
30 Security Council Report, Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict: Cross Cutting Report (New York: Security Council Report, 2015), p. 28Google Scholar.
31 Hultman, Lisa, Kathman, Jacob, and Shannon, Megan, ‘United Nations peacekeeping and civilian protection in civil war’, American Journal of Political Science, 57:4 (2013), pp. 875–891Google Scholar.
32 See Boutellis, Arthur and Williams, Paul D., Peace Operations, the African Union and the United Nations: Toward More Effective Partnership (New York, International Peace Institute, 2013)Google Scholar; Diehl, Paul F. and Balas, Alexandru, Peace Operations (2nd edn, Cambridge: Polity, 2014), pp. 74–75Google Scholar.
33 Wallensteen, Peter and Svensson, Isak, ‘Talking peace: International mediation in armed conflicts’, Journal of Peace Research, 51:2 (2014), pp. 315–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
34 Balas, Alexandru, Owsiak, Andrew P., and Diehl, Paul F., ‘Demanding peace: the impact of prevailing conflict on the shift from peacekeeping to peacebuilding’, Peace and Change, 37:2 (2012), pp. 195–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
35 See, for example, Sikkink, Kathryn, The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions are Changing the World (New York: Norton, 2011)Google Scholar.
36 Davies, Sara E., Nackers, Kimberly, and Teitt, Sarah, ‘Women, peace and security as an ASEAN priority’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 68:3 (2014), pp. 333–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
37 See, for example, Dharmapuri, Sahana, ‘More than just a number game: Increasing women’s participation in UN peacekeeping’, International Peace Institute, Providing for Peacekeeping Project, thematic paper no. 4 (New York, 2013)Google Scholar.
38 Krasner, Steven D., ‘Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables’, in Steve D. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca, NJ: Cornell University Press, 1983), p. 2Google Scholar.
39 Cronin, Institutions for the Common Good, p. 3.
40 Keohane, Robert, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984), pp. 80–81Google Scholar.
41 See Young, Oran, ‘International regimes: Toward a new theory of institutions’, World Politics, 39:1 (1986), pp. 104–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Young, Oran, International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989)Google Scholar.
42 For the former see Krasner, Steven, Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for the latter see Gilpin, Robert, War and Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981)Google Scholar.
43 Such as McCormack, Tara, ‘The Responsibility to Protect and the end of the Western century’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 4:1 (2010), pp. 69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Moses, Jeremy, Sovereignty and Responsibility: Power, Norms and Intervention in International Relations (London: Palgrave, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
44 See Reus-Smit, Christian, The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity and Institutional Rationality in International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
45 See Haas, Peter, ‘Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control’, International Organization, 43:3 (1989), pp. 377–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Adler, Emmanuel and Haas, Peter, ‘Conclusion: Epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program’, International Organization, 46:1 (1992), pp. 367–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For an example of the application of this type of thinking to a related regime see Kardam, Nuket, ‘The emerging global gender equality regime from neoliberal and constructivist perspectives in International Relations’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 6:1 (2004), pp. 85–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
46 MacFarlane and Khong, Human Security and the UN.
47 See Bellamy, Massacres and Morality.
48 Bellamy, Alex J. and Williams, Paul D., ‘Protecting civilians in uncivil wars’, in Sara E. Davies and Luke Glanville (eds), Protecting the Displaced: Deepening the Responsibility to Protect (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2010), p. 142Google Scholar.
49 See Freeman, Alwyn V., ‘War crimes by enemy nationals administering justice in occupied territory’, American Journal of International Law, 41:3 (1947), pp. 579–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Durr, Oliver, ‘Humanitarian law of armed conflict: Problems of applicability’, Journal of Peace Research, 24:3 (1987), p. 268CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
50 See UN Doc. S/1998/318, 13 April 1998. For a recent overview see Security Council Report, Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict.
51 See Nsia-Pepra, Kofi, UN Robust Peacekeeping: Civilian Protection in Violent Civil Wars (London: Palgrave, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; De Carvalho, Benjamin and Sending, Ole Jacob, The Protection of Civilians in UN Peacekeeping: Concept, Implementation and Practice (Berlin: Nomos, 2012)Google Scholar; and Wills, Siobhan, Protecting Civilians: The Obligations of Peacekeepers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
52 Loescher, Gil, Betts, Alexander, and Milner, James, The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR): The Politics and Practice of Refugee Protection into the Twenty-First Century (London: Routledge, 2008), pp. 2–3Google Scholar.
53 Cohen, Roberta, ‘Developing an international system for internally displaced persons’, International Studies Perspectives, 7:2 (2006), pp. 87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
54 Leatherman, Janie L., Sexual Violence and Armed Conflict (Cambridge: Polity, 2011)Google Scholar.
55 See Olsson, Louise and Gizelis, Theodora-Iseme, Gender, Peace and Security: Implementing UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (London: Routledge, 2015)Google Scholar; Davies, Sara E., Teitt, Sarah, Stamnes, Eli, and Nwokora, Zim (eds), Responsibility to Protect and Women, Peace and Security: Aligning the Protection Agendas (The Hague: Brill, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
56 See Charvet, John and Kaczynska-Nay, Elisa, The Liberal Project and Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a New World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
57 Chauville, Roland, ‘The universal periodic review’s first cycle: Successes and failures’, in Hilary Charlesworth and Emma Larking (eds), Human Rights and Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 87–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
58 According to Risse and Ropp, the gathering of information is key for applying pressure on governments and mobilizing action. See Risse, Thomas and Ropp, Stephen C., ‘Introduction and overview’, in Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink (eds), The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), p. 8Google Scholar.
59 Schabas, William, Unimaginable Atrocities: Justice, Politics and Rights at the War Crimes Tribunals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), p. 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
60 Jo, Hyeran and Simmons, Beth A., ‘Can the International Criminal Court deter atrocity?’, Social Science Research Network (2014)Google Scholar.
61 Kim, Hunjoon and Sikkink, Kathryn, ‘Explaining the deterrence effects for human rights prosecutions in transitional countries’, International Studies Quarterly, 54:4 (2010), pp. 939–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
62 Kemp, Walter, The OSCE in a New Context (London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1996)Google Scholar.
63 See Williams, Paul D., ‘From non-intervention to non-indifference: the origins and development of the African Union’s security culture’, African Affairs, 106:423 (2007), pp. 253–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Boutellis and Williams, Peace Operations, the African Union and the United Nations.
64 Ban Ki-moon, ‘Implementing the Responsibility to Protect: Report of the Secretary-General’, UN Doc. A/63/677, 12 January 2009.
65 Annan, Interventions.
66 Young, ‘International regimes’, p. 106.
67 Krasner, ‘Structural causes and regime consequences’, p. 2.
68 See Bellamy, Massacres and Morality.
69 See, for example, Finnemore, Martha, National Interests in International Society (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996), p. 22Google Scholar.
70 Krasner, ‘Structural causes and regime consequences’, p. 2.
71 Thakur, ‘R2P after Libya and Syria’, p. 331.
72 See, for example, Lischer, Sarah Kenyon, ‘Military intervention and the humanitarian “force multiplier”’, Global Governance, 13:1 (2007), pp. 99–118Google Scholar.
73 Fortna, Virginia Page, Does Peacekeeping Work? Shaping Belligerents’ Choices After Civil War (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008)Google Scholar.
74 Hultman, Kathman, and Shannon, ‘United Nations peacekeeping’.
75 Krain, Matthew, ‘International intervention and the severity of genocides and politicides’, International Studies Quarterly, 49:3 (2005), pp. 363–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kathman, Jacob and Wood, Reed, ‘Managing threat, cost, and incentive to kill: the short- and long-term effects of intervention in mass killing’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55:5 (2011), pp. 735–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
76 Murdie, Amanda M. and Davis, David R., ‘Shaming and blaming: Using events data to assess the impact of Human Rights INGOs’, International Studies Quarterly, 56:1 (2011), pp. 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
77 Kim and Sikkink, ‘Explaining the deterrence effects’.
78 Spangaro, J., Adogu, C., Ranmuthugala, G., Davies, G. Powell, Steinacker, L., and Zwi, A., ‘What evidence exists for initiatives to reduce risk and incidence of sexual violence in armed conflict and other humanitarian crises? A systematic review’, PLoS ONE, 8:5 (2013)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
79 Hultman, Lisa, ‘UN peace operations and the protection of civilians: Cheap talk or norm implementation?’, Journal of Peace Research, 50:1 (2013), pp. 59–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
80 Beardsley, Kyle and Schmidt, Holger, ‘Following the flag or following the charter? Examining the determinants of UN involvement in international crises 1945–2002’, International Studies Quarterly, 56:1 (2012), pp. 33–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
81 All cited in Bellamy, Alex J., ‘The Responsibility to Protect turns ten’, Ethics and International Affairs, 29:3 (2015), pp. 161–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
82 UN Doc. S/PV.6491, 26 February 2011, p. 4.
83 Ibid.
84 UN Doc. S/PV.6498, 17 March 2011, p. 8
85 Ibid., p. 10
86 UN Doc. S/PV. 7216, 14 July 2014, p. 5
87 Pinker, The Better Angels of our Nature.
88 Human Security Report 2013, p. 3.
89 For a discussion see Ulfelder, ‘Genocide is going out of fashion’.
90 Hehir, Aidan, Humanitarian Intervention: An Introduction (London: Palgrave, 2013), p. 318CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
- 19
- Cited by