Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:46:08.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nano-Safety or Nano-Security? Reassessing Europe's Nanotechnology Regulation in the Context of International Security Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Hitoshi Nasu
Affiliation:
Australian National University (ANU) College of Law, contact:
Thomas Faunce
Affiliation:
ANU College of Law and ANU College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, contact:

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 OJ C-325 (24 December 2002), Articles 152, 153 and 174. As of 6 May 2012, these provisions have been incorporated into the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, OJ C-83/47 (30 March 2010), Articles 168, 169 and 191.

2 European Commission, “Towards a European Strategy for Nanotechnology: Communication from the Commission”, 2004, p. 5, available on the internet at <http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/pdf/nano_com_en.pdf> (last accessed on 16 July 2012).

3 Faunce, Thomas, Nanotechnology for a Sustainable World (Cheltenham: Edward Elger, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Annex 1C of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, 15 April 1994, in force 1 January 1995, 1867 United Nations Treaty Series (1995), pp.3 et sqq, Articles 7, 8.2, 66.2.

5 OJ L 317/3.

6 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction, 10 April 1972, in force 26 March 1975, 1015 United Nations Treaty Series (1976), pp.163 et sqq. (hereinafter Biological Weapons Convention), Article X.

7 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 9 May 1992, in force 21 March 1994, 1771 United Nations Treaty Series (1994), pp.107 et sqq., Article 4(3).

8 Energy Charter Treaty, 17 December 1994, in force 16 April 1998, 2080 United Nations Treaty Series (1999), pp.100 et sqq.

9 Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade, 10 September 1998, in force 24 February 2004, 2244 United Nations Treaty Series (2004), pp.337 et sqq., Article 16.

10 International Nuclear Safety Group, “The Interface between Safety and Security at Nuclear Power Plants”, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), INSAG-24, 2010, paras. 7–8, available on the internet at <http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1472_web.pdf> (last accessed on 12 July 2012).

11 Naoto Kan, “Former Japanese PM Naoto Kan on the Fukushima Disaster: A Changing View of Nuclear Power”, Foreign Affairs, 8 March 2012, available on the internet at <http://www.foreignaffairs.com/features/letters-from/former-japanese-pm-naoto-kan-onthe-fukushima-disaster> (last accessed on 12 July 2012).

12 “Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons”, Advisory Opinion, 8 July 1996, ICJ Reports (1996), pp.226 et sqq., at p. 242, para. 29.

13 35 American Journal of International Law (1941), at 716.

14 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 10 December 1982, in force 16 November 1994, 1833 United Nations Treaty Series, pp.397 et sqq, Articles 192–5; Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, 29 December 1972, in force 30 August 1975, 1046 United Nations Treaty Series, pp.120 et sqq., and its Protocol, 8 November 1996, in force 24 March 2006, 36 International Legal Materials, pp.1 et sqq.

15 Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty, 4 October 1991, in force 14 January 1998, 30 International Legal Materials, pp.1461 et sqq.

16 Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal, 22 March 1989, in force 24 May 1992, 1673 United Nations Treaty Series (1992), pp.57 et sqq.

17 Biological Weapons Convention, supra note 6; Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction, 13 January 1993, in force 29 April 1997, 1974 United Nations Treaty Series (1997), pp.45 et sqq.

18 Birnie, Patricia and Boyle, Alan. International Law and the Environment, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009), at p. 113 Google Scholar.

19 Bowman, Diana M, van Calster, Geert, and Friedrichs, Steffi, “Nanomaterials and Regulation of Cosmetics”, 5 Nature Nanotechnology (2010), p. 92 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

20 P7_TC2-COD(2008)0028, adopted at second reading on 6 July 2011. The amended regulation is not in force due to refusal by the European Union Council.

21 Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Making Available on the Market and Use of Biocidal Products, PE-CONS 3/12 (effective from 1 September 2013), Art. 4(4).

22 Eisenberger, Iris, Nentwich, Michael, Fiedeler, Ulrich, et al., “Nano Regulation in the European Union”, 17 Nano Trust-Dossiers (2010), pp.1 et sqq., at p. 3Google Scholar. The Commission launched a comprehensive REACH Implementation Project on Nanomaterials in 2009, which has been providing reports on technical aspects of the implementation of REACH. Also, in cooperation with the CARACAL Group on Nanomaterials (CASG Nano, composed of member states and stakeholder experts) the Commission has discussed how the provisions of REACH apply to nanomaterials and what issues need to be addressed. See, European Commisison, “Nnaomaterials”, available on the internet at <http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/nanotech/index.htm#ripon> (last accessed on 16 July 2012).

23 Nasu, Hitoshi and Faunce, Tom, “The Proposed Ban on Certain Nanomaterials for Electrical and Electronic Equipment in Europe and Its Global Security Implications: A Search for an Alternative Regulatory Approach”, 2(3) European Journal of Law and Technology (2011), available on the internet at <http://ejlt.org//article/view/79> (last accessed on 12 July 2012)Google Scholar.

24 Giddens, Anthony, “Risk and Responsbility”, 62 Modern Law Review (1999), pp.1 et sqq CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 An example is nano-energetics to enhance the lethality of explosives. See, Ramaswamy, Alba, Kaste, Pamela, Miziolek, Andrzej, et al, ‘Nanoenergetics Weaponization and Characterization Technologies’, in Miziolek, Andrzej, Karna, Shashi, Matthew Mauro, J, et al, (eds), Defense Applications of Nanomaterials (Washington DC: American Chemical Society,, 2005), pp.180 et sqq CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Nano Zairyou Kankyou Eikyou Kiso Chousa Kentoukai [Commission of Inquiry into the Impact of Nanomaterials on the Environment], “Kougyouyou Nano Zairyo ni kansuru Kankyou Eikyou Boushi Gaidorain [Guideline for the Prevention of Environmental Hazard in relation to Industrial Nanomaterials]”, 2009, available on the internet at <http://www.env.go.jp/press/file_view.php?serial=13177&hou_id=10899> (last accessed on 16 July 2012); Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, “On Preventive Measures for the Purpose of Preventing Workplace Exposure during the Manufacturing and Treatment of Nanomaterials”, 2008, available on the internet at <http://wwwhourei.mhlw.go.jp/hourei/doc/tsuuchi/200207-a00.pdf> (last accessed on 16 July 2012);

27 Brar, Satinder K, Verna, Mausam, Tryagi, R.D. and Surampalli, R.Y., “Engineered Nanoparticles in Wastewater and Wastewater Sludge – Evidence and Impacts”, 30 Waste Management (2010), pp.504 et sqq CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.; Gottschalk, Fadri and Nowack, Bernd, “The Release of Engineered Nanomaterials to the Environment”, 13 Journal of Environmental Monitoring (2011), pp.1145 et sqq., at pp.1145–1146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

28 Seaton, Anthony, Tran, Lang, Aitken, Robert and Donaldson, Kenneth, “Nanoparticles, Human Health Hazard and Regulation”, 7 Journal of Royal Society Interface (2010), pp. S119 et sqq., at pp. S126-S127CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

29 Bystrzejewska-Piotrawska, Grazyna, Golimowski, Jerzy and Urban, Pawel L., “Nanoparticles: Their Potential Toxicity, Waste and Environmental Management”, 29 Waste Management (2009), pp. 2587 et sqq., at p.2592CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Directive 2002/96/EC.

31 European Parliament, Debate on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment, 3 February 2011, CRE 03/02/2011–5.

32 P7_TC2-COD(2008)0241, para. 18.

33 Homer-Dixon, Thomas F, Environment, Scarcity, and Violence (1999), at pp.133168 Google Scholar; Gleick, Peter H, “Environment and Security: The Clear Connections”, 47(3) The Bulletin of Atomic Science (1991), pp.17 et sqq., at pp. 19–20Google Scholar; Ullman, Richard H, “Redefining Security”, 8 International Security (1983), pp.129 et sqq., at pp.139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Faunce, Thomas, “Future Perspectives on Solar Fuels”, in Wydrzynski, Tom, Hillier, Warwick, Peter, Laurie, Schuth, Ferdi and Zhao, Tim S. (eds), Molecular Solar Fuels: RSC Energy and Environment Series (London: Royal Society of Chemistry, 2012), pp.506 et sqq Google Scholar.

35 Savage, Nora, Diallo, Mamadou, Duncan, Jeremiah, et al. (eds), Nanotechnology Applications for Clean Water (New York: William Andrew, 2009)Google Scholar; Hillie, Thembela and Holphe, Mbhuti, “Nanotechnology and the Challenge of Clean Water”, 2 Nature Nanotechnology (2007), p. 663 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

36 Katherine Bourzac, “New Magnets Could Solve Our Rare-Earth Problems”, MIT Technology Review, 20 January 2011, available on the internet at <http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/27112/page1> (last accessed on 16 July 2012).