Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:45:30.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Dispensation of Justice by Public Authorities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jan Henrik Klement
Jan Henrik Klement*
Affiliation:
Institute for German, and European Administrative Law, University of Heidelberg, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Austrian Umweltsenat is a court or tribunal for the purposes of Article 234 EC. The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive is to be interpreted as meaning that a Member State has to subject a transboundary project to environmental impact assessment (EIA) even if the size of the project on its own territory does not reach the threshold for an assessment as defined in Annex I of the EIA Directive but the threshold is exceeded when parts of the project that are located in another State are taken into account (author’s headnote).

Type
Case Notes
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 195 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Judgment of 10 December 2009.

** Editorial Hint: Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment.

2 An overview is provided by Christoph Grabenwarter, in Karl Korinek/Michael Holoubek (eds), Österreichisches Bundesverfassungsrecht (Vienna: Springer), Article 133 Annex A.

3 Cf. Öhlinger, Theo, Verfassungsrecht, 8nd. ed. (Vienna: facultas. wuv University Press 2009)Google Scholar, paras. 631 et sqq.

4 I. a. Case B 1625/98, Telekom-Control-Kommission, and Case B 110/02, Bundeskommunikationssenat.

5 Case G 175/99, Privatrundfunkbehörde.

6 On former Article 20 B-VG Bernhard Raschauer, in Korinek/Holoubek (eds), “Österreichisches Bundesverfassungsrecht”, supra note 2, Article 20(1) para. 79; Christoph Grabenwarter and Michael Holoubek, “Demokratie, Rechtsstaat und Kollegialbehörden mit richterlichem Einschlag”, ZfV (2000), pp. 520 et sqq.

7 Case 61/65, Vaassen-Goebbels [1966] ECR 261 at 273.

8 Cf. Möllers, Christoph, Gewaltengliederung (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2005), pp. 76 et sqqGoogle Scholar.

9 Möllers, “Gewaltengliederung”, supra note 8, p. 95.

10 Cf. Grabenwarter, Verfahrensgarantien in der Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit (Vienna, New York: Springer 1997), p. 370 et sqq. with reference to the legal systems of the Member States.

11 Cf. Grabenwarter/Holoubek, “Demokratie, Rechtsstaat und Kollegialbehörden mit richterlichem Einschlag”, supra note 6, at pp. 199 et sqq.

12 Öhlinger, “Verfassungsrecht”, supra note 3, para. 643.

13 On this topic Klement, Jan Henrik, “Die Kumulation von Grundrechtseingriffen im Umweltrecht”, 134 AöR (2009), pp. 35 et sqq., at p. 68Google Scholar.

14 Cf. Jansen, Oswald/Schöndorf-Haubold, Bettina (eds), European composite administration (Antwerpen: Intersentia 2010, forthcoming)Google Scholar; von Danwitz, Thomas, Europäisches Verwaltungsrecht (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer 2008), pp. 609 et sqqGoogle Scholar.