Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:31:52.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Registration Requirements for Monomer Substances Integrated in Polymers under the REACH-Regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Sebastian Heselhaus
Sebastian Heselhaus*
Affiliation:
University Lucerne, Switzerland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

1. The concept of ‘monomer substances’ in Article 6 (3) of Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No. 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC, relates only to reacted monomers which are integrated in polymers (official headnote).

2. Article 6 (3) of Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 infringes neither the principle of proportionality nor the principle of equal treatment (author's headnote).

Type
Case Notes
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 189 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

** Editorial Hint: Article 2 (9) and Article 6 (3) Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). OJ 2006, L 396/1, corrigendum OJ 2007, L 136, pp. 3–846.

1 OJ 2006 L 396/1 and corrigendum OJ 2007 L 136/3.

2 Opinion of Advocate General Kokott in Case C-558/07, S.P.C.M. et al. v. Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 10 March 2009, paras. 20–22.

3 Opinion of Advocate General Kokott in Case C-558/07, supra note 2, para. 20.

4 REACH-Regulation, supra note 1, Article 1.

5 Case C-558/07, S.P.M.C. et al. v. Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 7 July 2009, para. 2.

6 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, para. 17; Opinion of the Advocate General Kokott, supra note 2, paras. 65–68.

7 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, paras. 38, 40, 72, 80–81.

8 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, paras. 20–21.

9 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, para. 22.

10 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, paras. 23–24.

11 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, paras. 25–26.

12 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, para. 29.

13 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, paras. 30–31.

14 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, paras. 33–34.

15 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, para. 36.

16 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, para. 42.

17 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, paras. 44–45.

18 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, para. 49.

19 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, paras. 50–52.

20 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, paras. 52–53.

21 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, paras. 54–55.

22 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, paras. 59–63.

23 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, para. 62.

24 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, paras. 64–71.

25 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, para. 67.

26 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, paras. 73–80.

27 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, para. 74.

28 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, para. 78.

29 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, para. 79.

30 Opinion of Advocate General Kokott in Case C-558/07, supra note 2, paras. 80–100, esp. para. 84.

31 For the likeliness of such a situation see the arguments put forward by the Commission before the WTO-Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, minutes G/TBT/M/41 of June 2008 of the meeting of the WTO-Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade of 21 March 2007, point 40.

32 Opinion of Advocate General Kokott in Case C-558/07, supra note 2, para. 109.

33 Opinion of Advocate General Kokott in Case C-558/07, supra note 2, para. 107.

34 Opinion of Advocate General Kokott in Case C-558/07, supra note 2, paras. 110–113.

35 Opinion of Advocate General Kokott in Case C-558/07, supra note 2, para. 115.

36 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, para. 53.

37 Case C-558/07, supra note 5, para. 55.