Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:39:18.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Divided loyalty? Identification and political participation of dual citizens in Switzerland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2015

Andrea Schlenker
Andrea Schlenker*
Affiliation:
Institute of Political Science, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
*
*E-mail: andrea.schlenker@unilu.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In spite of the recent increase in dual citizenship, there are widespread fears that this double status undermines loyalty towards the state, understood as identification with and political participation in the country of residence. We analyze whether there are systematic differences between dual citizens, mono citizens, and foreign residents in this respect, based on data from a 2013 survey of dual citizens in Switzerland with very different migration backgrounds. The results reveal that controlling for migration-related and socio-demographic factors, dual citizens are more loyal in many respects than foreign residents, but there are no significant differences between dual citizens and mono citizens in their level of identification with Switzerland and political participation there. They are even more likely than mono citizens to participate in serving its interests. In addition, there is no trade-off between these forms of loyalty to the country of residence and identification and political participation in the country of descent. On the contrary, they are positively related. Transnational loyalties seem to co-exist or even to be mutually reinforcing. Thus, dual citizenship does not seem to diminish loyalty to the country of residence and countries therefore do not stand to lose anything by allowing it.

Keywords

dual citizenshiptransnationalismloyaltyidentificationpolitical participation
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , November 2016 , pp. 517 - 546
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achermann, C., D’Amato, G., Kamm, M. and Von Rütte, B. (2010), Country Report: Switzerland, Fiesole: EUDO Citizenship Observatory.Google Scholar
Aleinikoff, T.A. and Klusmeyer, D. (2002), Citizenship Policies for an Age of Migration, Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Barnes, S.H., et al. (1979), Political Action – Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies, Beverly Hills/London: Sage.Google Scholar
Basch, L., Glick Schiller, N. and Szanton Blanc, C. (1994), Nations Unbound: Transnational Projects, Postcolonial Predicaments and Deterritorialized Nation-States, Langhorne: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Bauböck, R. (2002), ‘Farewell to multiculturalism? Sharing values and identities an societies of immigration’, Journal of International Migration and Integration 3(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauböck, R. (2003), ‘Wessen Stimme zählt? Thesen über demokratische Beteiligung in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft. In: Wiener Hefte zu Migration und Integration in Theorie und Praxis ’, Defizitäre Demokratie – MigrantInnen in der Politik 1: 26–44.Google Scholar
Bauböck, R. (2008), Stakeholder Citizenship: An Idea Whose Time has Come? Washington, DC: TransAtlantic Council on Migration, Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Bauböck, R. (ed.) (2010), Dual Citizenship for Transborder Minorities? How to respond to the Hungarian-Slovak Tit-for-Tat. EUI Working Papers. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, EUDO Citizenship Observatory, San Domenico di Fiesole.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2008), Citizenship: A Very Short Introduction, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bevelander, P. and Pendakur, R. (2010), ‘Voting and social inclusion in Sweden’, International Migration 49(4): 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevelander, P. and Pendakur, R. (2012), ‘Citizenship, co-ethnic populations and employment probabilities of immigrants in Sweden’, Journal of International Migration and Integration 2: 203–222.Google Scholar
BFS (Bundesamt für Statistik) (2011), Eidgenössische Volkszählung 2000 , Neuchâtel: BFS.Google Scholar
BFS (Bundesamt für Statistik) (2014), Statistik der Nationalratswahlen, Neuchâtel: BFS.Google Scholar
Blatter, J. (2011), ‘Dual citizenship and theories of democracy’, Citizenship Studies 15(6–7): 769–798.Google Scholar
Bloemraad, I. (2004), ‘Who claims dual citizenship? The limits of postnationalism, the possibilities of transnationalism, and the persistence of traditionalism’, International Migration Review 38(2): 389–426.Google Scholar
Bloemraad, I., Korteweg, A. and Yurdakul, G. (2008), ‘Citizenship and immigration: multiculturalism, assimilation, and challenges to the Nation-State’, Annual Review of Sociology 34: 153–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M.B. (2001), ‘The many faces of social identity: implications for political psychology’, Political Psychology 22(1): 115–125.Google Scholar
Brondsted-Sejersen, T. (2008), ‘“I Vow to Thee My Countries” – the expansion of dual citizenship in the 21st Century’, International Migration Review 42(3): 523–549.Google Scholar
Cain, B.E. and Doherty, B.J. (2006), ‘The impact of dual nationality on political participation’, in L. Taeku, S.K. Ramakrishnan and R. Ricardo (eds), Transforming Politics, Transforming America: The Political and Civic Incorporation of Immigrants in the United States, Charlottesville/London: University of Virginia Press, pp. 89–105.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. (2003), ‘Deterritorialized loyalty: multiculturalism and Bosnia’, in M. Waller and A. Linklater (eds), Political Loyalty and the Nation-State, London: Routledge, pp. 43–58.Google Scholar
Castles, S. and Davidson, A. (2000), Citizenship and Migration: Globalization and the Politics of Belonging, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohen, J.L. (1999), ‘Changing paradigms of citizenship and the exclusiveness of the demos’, International Sociology 14(3): 245–268.Google Scholar
De Rooij, A. (2012), ‘Patterns of immigrant political participation: explaining differences in types of political participation between immigrants and the majority population in Western Europe’, European Sociological Review 28(4): 455–481.Google Scholar
Dekker, B. and Siegel, M. (2013), ‘Transnationalism and Integration: Complements or Substitutes?’ UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series 071. United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology. Retrieved 4 February 2015 from http://ideas.repec.org/p/unm/unumer/2013071.html Google Scholar
EDA (Eidgenössisches Departement für auswärtige Angelegenheiten) (2011), Anzahl Schweizerinnen und Schweizer im Ausland auf über 695 000 gestiegen, Medienmitteilung. Retrieved 26 February 2011 from http://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/de/home/recent/media/single.html?id=37699 Google Scholar
Erdal, M. and Oeppen, C. (2013), ‘Migrant balancing acts: understanding the interactions between integration and transnationalism’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 39(6): 867–884.Google Scholar
Faist, T. (ed.) (2007), Dual Citizenship in Europe: From Nationhood to Societal Integration, Avebury, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Faist, T. and Gerdes, J. (2008), Dual Citizenship in an Age of Mobility, Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Font, J. and Mendez, M. (eds) (2013), Surveying Ethnic Minorities and Immigrant Populations: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies , Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, J. (2005), ‘Unpacking transnational citizenship’, Annual Review of Political Science 8: 171–201.Google Scholar
Gerdes, J. and Faist, T. (2007), ‘Varying views on democracy, rights and duties, and membership: the politics of dual citizenship in European immigration states’, in T. Faist and P. Kivisto (eds), Citizenship: Discourse , Theory, and Transnational Prospects , Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 137–160.Google Scholar
Gershon, S.A. and Pantoja, A.D. (2014), ‘Pessimists, optimists, and skeptics: the consequences of transnational ties for Latino immigrant naturalization’, Social Science Quarterly 95(2): 328–342.Google Scholar
Giugni, M. and Passy, F. (2004), ‘Migrant mobilization between political institutions and citizenship regimes: a comparison of France and Switzerland’, European Journal of Political Research 43: 51–82.Google Scholar
Glick-Schiller, N., Basch, L. and Blanc-Szanton, C. (1992), Towards a Transnational Perspective on Migration, New York: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Goodin, R.E. and Tanasoca, A. (2014), ‘Double voting’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 92(4): 743–758.Google Scholar
Guarnizo, L.E., Portes, A. and Haller, W. (2003), ‘Assimilation and transnationalism: determinants of transnational political action among contemporary migrants’, American Journal of Sociology 108(6): 1211–1248.Google Scholar
Hainmüller, J. and Hangartner, D. (2013), ‘Who gets a Swiss passport? A natural experiment in immigrant discrimination’, American Political Science Review 107(1): 159–187.Google Scholar
Hammar, T. (1985), ‘Dual citizenship and political integration’, International Migration Review 9(3): 438–450.Google Scholar
Helbling, M. (2010), ‘Switzerland: Contentious citizenship attribution in a federal state’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36(5): 793–802.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A.O. (1970), Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, M. (2009), The Politics of Citizenship in Europe, Cambridge/New York: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, L. and Khatib, N. (2007), ‘American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement’, American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, S.P. (2004), Who Are We? The Challenge to America’s National Identity, New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Itzigsohn, J. and Saucedo, S.G. (2002), ‘Immigrant incorporation and sociocultural transnationalism’, International Migration Review 36(3): 766–798.Google Scholar
Jakobson, M.-L. and Kalev, L. (2013), ‘Transnational citizenship as status, identity and participation: comparative assessment’, in K.N. Demetriou (ed.), Democracy in Transition. Political Participation in the European Union, Frankfurt: Springer, pp. 201–224.Google Scholar
Jennings, M.K., van Deth, J.W., Barnes, S.H., Fuchs, D., Heunks, F., Inglehart, R.F., Kaase, M., Klingemann, H.-D., Thomassen, J., Kriesi, H., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J.W. and Giugni, M.G. (1990), Continuities in Political Action. A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kivisto, P. and Faist, T. (2007), Citizenship: Discourse, Theory, and Transnational Prospects, Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Koopmans, R., Statham, P., Giugni, M. and Passy, F. (2005), Contested Citizenship. Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Koskelo, Krister (2012), Dual citizenship worldwide. Harvard Political Review 39(2), Retrieved 9 May 2015 from http://harvardpolitics.com/covers/dual-citizenship-worldwideGoogle Scholar
Koslowski, R. (2003), ‘Challenges of international cooperation in a world of increasing Dual nationality’, in K. Hailbronner and D. Martin (eds), Rights and Duties of Dual Nationals: Evolution and Prospects, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 157–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, H., et al. (1995), New Social Movements in Western Europe, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Leighley, J.E. (1995), ‘Opportunities and incentives: a field essay on political participation’, Political Research Quarterly 48(1): 181–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighley, J. and Vedlitz, A. (1999), ‘Race, ethnicity, and political participation: competing models and contrasting explanations’, The Journal of Politics 61(4): 1092–1114.Google Scholar
Lipps, O., Laganà, F., Pollien, A. and Gianettoni, L. (2013), ‘Under-representation of foreign minorities in cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys in Switzerland’, in J. Font and M. Mendez (eds), Surveying Ethnic Minorities and Immigrant Populations: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies , Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 241–270.Google Scholar
Mazzolari, F. (2009), ‘Dual citizenship rights: do they make more and richer citizens?’ Demography 46(1): 169–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mügge, L. (2012), ‘Dual nationality and transnational politics’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38(1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Naujoks, D. (2009), ‘Dual citizenship. The discourse on ethnic and political boundary-making in Germany’, Policy Brief No. 14, Focus Migration, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Ong, A. (1999), Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality, Durham/London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Østergaard-Nielsen, E. (2003), ‘The politics of migrants’ transnational political practices’, International Migration Review 37(3): 760–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedroza, L. (2014), ‘The democratic potential of enfranchising resident migrants’, International Migration, early view, doi: 10.1111/imig.12162.Google Scholar
Portes, A. (1999), ‘Conclusion: towards a new world – the origins and effects of transnational activities’, Journal of Ethnic and Racial Studies 22(2): 463–477.Google Scholar
Ramakrishnan, S.K. (2005), Democracy in Immigrant America: Changing Demographics and Political Participation, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Renshon, S.A. (2005), The 50% American. Immigration and National Identity in an Age of Terror, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Riedel, S. (2012), Doppelte Staatsbürgerschaft als Konfliktpotential. Nationale Divergenzen unter europäischer Flagge, Berlin: Studie der Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.Google Scholar
Royce, J. (1967[1908]), Race Questions, Provincialism, and Other American Problems, Freeport: NY Books for Libraries Press.Google Scholar
Schildkraut, D. (2005), ‘The rise and fall of political engagement among Latinos: the role of identity and perceptions of discrimination’, Political Behavior 27(3): 285–312.Google Scholar
Schlenker, A. and Blatter, J. (2014), ‘Conceptualizing and evaluating (new) forms of citizenship between nationalism and cosmopolitanism’, Democratization 21(6): 1091–1116.Google Scholar
Schröter, Y.M., Mengelkamp, C. and Jäger, R.S. (2005), Doppelte Staatsbürgerschaft – ein gesellschaftlicher Diskurs über Mehrstaatigkeit, Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.Google Scholar
Schweiz am Sonntag (2014), ‘Doppelbürger sollen Schweiz vertreten’, Schweiz am Sonntag, 23 August. Retrieved 19 May 2015 from http://www.schweizamsonntag.ch/ressort/nachrichten/doppelbuerger_sollen_schweiz_vertreten/Google Scholar
Shklar, J.N. (1993), ‘Obligation, loyalty, exile’, Political Theory 21(2): 181–197.Google Scholar
Sieberer, U. (2011), ‘Selecting independent variables: competing recommendations for factor-centric and out-come-centric research designs’, in T. Gschwend and F. Schimmelfennig (eds), Research Design in Political Science. How to Practice What They Preach, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 163–182.Google Scholar
Smith, M.P. (2007), ‘The two faces of transnational citizenship’, Ethnic and Racial Studies 30(6): 1096–1116.Google Scholar
Spiro, P.J. (2008), Beyond Citizenship. American Identity After Globalization, Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Staton, J.K., Jackson, R.A. and Canache, D. (2007a), Dual nationality among latinos: what are the implications for political connectedness?’, The Journal of Politics 69(2): 470–482.Google Scholar
Staton, J.K., Jackson, R.A. and Canache, D. (2007b), ‘Costly citizenship? Dual nationality, institutions, naturalization, and political connectedness’, 19 June. Available from the Social Science Research Network at SSRN. Retrieved 21 November 2014 from http://ssrn.Com/abstract=995569 Google Scholar
Steinhardt, M.F. (2012), ‘Does citizenship matter? The economic impact of naturalizations in Germany’, Labour Economics 19: 813–823.Google Scholar
Tagesanzeiger (2014), ‘Motiviert, leistungsbereit, Secondo’, Tagesanzeiger, 15 January. Retrieved 19 May 2015 from http://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/schweiz/standard/Motiviert-leistungsbereit-Secondo-/story/15026124Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1981), Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology, New York: CUP Archive.Google Scholar
Tsuda, T. (2012), ‘Whatever happened to simultaneity? Transnational migration theory and dual engagement in sending and receiving countries’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38(4): 631–649.Google Scholar
Uutiset (2014), ‘Finland to probe whether dual citizenship poses a threat to national security’, Uutiset, 30 October. Retrieved 19 May 2015 from http://yle.fi/uutiset/finland_to_probe_whether_dual_citizenship_poses_a_threat_to_national_security/7575105Google Scholar
Verba, S. and Nie, N.H. (1972), Participation in America: Political democracy and Social Equality, New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Vertovec, S. (2009), Transnationalism: Key Ideas, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vink, M. and de Groot, G.R. (2010), ‘Citizenship attribution in Western Europe: international framework and domestic trends’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36(5): 713–734.Google Scholar
Vink, M. and Schmeets, H. (2013), ‘Does dual citizenship matter? Naturalization, citizenship of origin and employment status of immigrants in the Netherlands’. Paper presented at the International Conference of Europeanists, June 25–27, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Vink, M., Prokic-Breuer, T. and Dronkers, J. (2013), ‘Immigrant naturalization in the context of institutional diversity: policy matters, but to whom?’, International Migration 51(5): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, L. (2008), ‘Transnationalism, active citizenship, and belonging in Canada’, International Journal 63(1): 79–100.Google Scholar