The original publication contains erroneous illustrations. The correct versions of Table 1, Table 3, Table 4, and Table 5 are entailed in this corrigendum.
Table 1. Solution paths for military participation in the anti-Daesh coalition
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a87a/6a87af38ddaeac6aaca9f7fb6512b48cb9c65ee1" alt=""
Note: Black circles indicate the presence of a condition, crossed-out circles refer to the absence of the condition.
Table 3. EU governments and explanatory conditions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a18f7/a18f72d5d23c0f1a7502decfcb91258384ab4a59" alt=""
Table 4. Testing for necessary conditions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f53ec/f53ec4313112276113508b2dc0d846b0843f1bc7" alt=""
Table 5. Truth table for military participation in the anti-Daesh coalition
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58e94/58e946502e41e552eafe3242fc37c3cbf3885388" alt=""
Notes: T = External Threat, A = Alliance Value, R = Right Executive, V = Parliamentary Veto Rights,
P = Public Threat Perception, MP = Military Participation, bold cases hold membership >0.50 in the outcome. Empty rows are omitted for presentational purposes (see online appendix for a table with logical remainders).