Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:01:47.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Insiders, thresholders, and outsiders in west European global justice networks: network positions and modes of coordination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Clare Saunders
Clare Saunders*
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer in Politics, Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK
*
*E-mail: c.saunders@exeter.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the new millennium, scholars have acclaimed a vigorous global justice movement (GJM). Many accounts have stressed the tolerant identities of those involved in this movement, and/or the movement's horizontal decision-making structure. Consequently, formal organizations are often excluded from analysis, precluding the chance to assess systematically whether they are involved in social movement modes of coordination. The article uses deductive block modelling and inferential statistics on survey data of a broad sample of 208 western European global justice organizations to uncover their modes of coordination. I find that many organizations commonly considered integral to the GJM demonstrate organizational and coalitional modes of coordination, while formal organizations often engage in coalitional work. Organizations most densely networked, including some formal organizations, do have social movement modes of coordination: they identify with the GJM, display continuity in attendance at international protests/events, and have contentious relations with political institutions. In addition, I raise methodological considerations for future studies of social movement modes of coordination.

Keywords

global justice movementglobal justice networksdeductive block modellingsocial movementsmodes of coordination
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , May 2014 , pp. 167 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baggott, R. (1995), Pressure Groups Today, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Batagelj, V., Mrvar, A. (1998). ‘Pajek (Win32, 2GB) 3.01, software for non-commercial use’. Retrieved 20 November 2011 from http://pajek.imfm.si/ Google Scholar
Best, K. (2005), ‘Rethinking the globalization movement: toward a cultural theory of contemporary democracy and communication’, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 2(3): 214–237.Google Scholar
Boykoff, J. (2006), ‘Framing dissent: mass media coverage of the global justice movement’, New Political Science 28(2): 201–228.Google Scholar
Breiger, R. (1976), ‘Career attributes and network structure: a blockmodel study of a biomedical research speciality’, American Sociological Review 41(1): 117–135.Google Scholar
Buttel, F. (2003), ‘Some observations on the anti-globalisation movement’, Australian Journal of Social Issues 38(1): 95–116.Google Scholar
Calinicos, A. (2009), ‘The 1999 Seattle protests gave birth to a global movement’, Socialist Worker 2179. Retrieved 20 February 2013 from http://www.socialistworker.co.u/art.php?id=19622 Google Scholar
Chin, C. Mittleman, J.H. (2000), ‘Conceptualizing resistance to globalization’, in B.K. Gills (ed.), Globalization and the Politics of Resistance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 29–45.Google Scholar
Crossley, N. (2003), ‘Even newer movements? Anti-corporate protests, capitalist crises and the remoralization of society’, Organization 10(2): 667–691.Google Scholar
Della Porta, D. (2005), ‘Multiple belongings, tolerant identities and the construction of “another politics”: between the European Social Forum and the Local Social Forum’, in D. Della Porta and S. Tarrow (eds), Transnational Protest and Global Activism, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 175–202.Google Scholar
Della Porta, D. (2007a), ‘The global justice movement: an introduction’, in D. Della Porta (ed.), The Global Justice Movement: Cross-National and Transnational Perspectives, Colorado: Paradigm, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Della Porta, D. (ed.) (2007b), The Global Justice Movement: Cross-National and Transnational Perspectives, Colorado: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Della Porta, D. (2009), ‘Global justice movement organizations: the organizational population’, in D. Della Porta (ed.), Democracy in Social Movements, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 16–43.Google Scholar
Della Porta, D. Diani, M. (1999), Social Movements: An Introduction, London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Della Porta, D. Mosca, L. (2005), ‘Global-net for global movements? A network of networks for a movement of movements’, Journal of Public Policy 25(1): 165–190.Google Scholar
Della Porta, D. Tarrow, S. (2005), ‘Transnational processes and social activism: an introduction’, in D. Della Porta and S. Tarrow (eds), Transnational Protest and Global Activism, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Della Porta, D., Andretta, M., Mosca, L. Reiter, H. (2006), Globalization from Below: Transnational Activists and Protest Networks, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Desai, M. (2001), ‘The new anti-capitalist movement: money and global civil society’, in H.K. Anheier, M. Glasius and M. Kaldor (eds), Global Civil Society 2001, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 51–79.Google Scholar
Diani, M. (1992), ‘The concept of social movement’, Sociological Review 40: 1–25.Google Scholar
Diani, M. (1995), Green Networks: A Structural Analysis of the Italian Environmental Movement, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Diani, M. (2012), ‘Modes of coordination of collective action: what actors in policy making?’, in M. Scotti and B. Vedres (eds), Networks in Social Policy Problems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101–123.Google Scholar
Diani, M. (forthcoming). ‘Organizational fields and social movement dynamics’, in J. Van Stekelenburg, C. Roggeband and B. Klandermans (eds), The Changing Dynamics of Contention. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Diani, M. Bison, I. (2004), ‘Organizations coalitions and movements’, Theory and Society 33(3/4): 281–309.Google Scholar
Edwards, B. McCarthy, J.D. (2004), ‘Resources and social movement mobilization’, in D.A. Snow, S.A. Soule, and H. Kriesi (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 116–152.Google Scholar
Ekins, P. (1992), A New World Order, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. (2004), ‘Beyond the third world: imperial globality global coloniality and anti-globalization social movements’, Third World Quarterly 25(1): 207–230.Google Scholar
Flesher Fominaya, C. (2010), ‘Creating cohesion from diversity: the challenge of collective identity formation in the global justice movement’, Sociological Inquiry 80(3): 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, J. (1970). ‘The tyranny of structurelessness’. Retrieved 10 July 2012 from www.struggle.ws.Google Scholar
Friedkin, N. (1981), ‘The development of structure in random networks: an analysis of the effects of increasing network density on five measures of structure’, Social Networks 3: 41–52.Google Scholar
Gamson, W. (1961), ‘A theory of coalition formation’, American Sociological Review 26: 373–382.Google Scholar
Gills, B.K. (2000), ‘Introduction: globalization and the politics of resistance’, in B.K. Gills (ed.), Globalization and the Politics of Resistance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graeber, D. (2004), ‘The new anarchists’, in T. Mertes (ed.), A Movement of Movements: Is Another World Really Possible?, London: Verso, pp. 205–215.Google Scholar
Graeber, D. (2009), Direct Action: An Ethnography, Edinburgh: AK Press.Google Scholar
Grant, W. (1995), Pressure Groups and British Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hadden, J. Tarrow, S. (2007), ‘Spillover or spillout? The global justice movement in the United States after 9/11’, Mobilization 12(4): 359–376.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J.C. (1985), The Politics of Insurgency: The Farm Workers’ Movement in the 1960s, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, G. Maloney, W. (1997), The Protest Business, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, M.E. Sikkink, K. (1998), Activists Beyond Borders, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kingsnorth, P. (2003), One No, Many Yeses: A Journey to the Heart of the Global Resistance Movement, Cambridge: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J.D. Zald, M.N. (1977), ‘Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory’, American Journal of Sociology 82(6): 1212–1241.Google Scholar
McDonald, K. (2006), Global Movements: Action and Culture, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Melucci, A. (1989), Nomads of the Present, Philadelphia: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Pianta, M. (2001), ‘Parallel summits of global civil society’, in H. Anheier, M. Glasius and M. Kaldor (eds), Global Civil Society 2001 pp. 169–194.Google Scholar
Pianta, M. Marchetti, R. (2007), ‘The global justice movements: the transnational dimension’, in D. Della Porta (ed.), The Global Justice Movement: Cross-National and Transnational Perspectives, Colorado: Paradigm, pp. 29–51.Google Scholar
Pleyers, J. (2010), Alter-Globalization: Becoming Actors in the Global Age, Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Routledge, P. Cumbers, A. (2008), Global Justice Networks: Geographies of Transnational Solidarity, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, C. (2007), ‘Using social network analysis to explore social movements: a relational approach’, Social Movement Studies 6(3): 227–243.Google Scholar
Saunders, C. (2009a), ‘It's not just structural: social movements are not homogenous responses to structural features but networks shaped by organisational strategies and status’, Sociological Research Online 14(1). Retrieved 20 February 2013 from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/14/1/4/saunders.html CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, C. (2009b), ‘Organizational size and democratic practices: can large be beautiful?’, in D. Della Porta (ed.), Democracy in Social Movements, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 150–170.Google Scholar
Saunders, C. (2011), ‘Unblocking the pathway to effective use of blockmodels in social movement research’, Mobilization 16(3): 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, C., Buechs, M., Papafragkou, A., Wallbridge, B., Smith, G. (forthcoming), ‘Beyond the activist ghetto: a deductive blockmodeling approach to understanding the relationship between contact with environmental organisations and public attitudes and behaviour’, Social Movement Studies.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (2000), Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Smith, J. (2002), ‘Globalizing resistance: the Battle of Seattle and the future of social movements’, in J. Smith and H. Johnston (eds), Globalization and Resistance: Transnational Dimensions of Social Movements, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 207–227.Google Scholar
St John, G. (2004), ‘Counter-tribes global protest and carnivals of reclamation’, Peace Review 16(4): 421–428.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (2002), ‘From lumping to splitting: specifying globalization and resistance’, in J. Smith and H. Johnston (eds), Globalization and Resistance: Transnational Dimensions of Social Movements, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 229–250.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (2005a), The New Transnational Activism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (2005b), ‘The dualities of transnational contention: “Two activist solitudes” or a new world altogether?’, Mobilization 10(1): 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, C. (1978), From Mobilization to Revolution, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Turner, R.H. Killian, L.M. (1957), Collective Behaviour, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Wasserman, S. Faust, K. (1994), Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar