Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:55:15.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The policy mood in Spain: the thermostat in a warm climate, 1978–2017

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2020

John Bartle ,
Agustí Bosch Open the ORCID record for Agustí Bosch [Opens in a new window]  and
Lluís Orriols
John Bartle
Affiliation:
Department of Government, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
Agustí Bosch*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science & PL, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
Lluís Orriols
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Getafe, Spain
*
*E-mail: agusti.bosch@uab.cat
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Representative democracies are supposed to be uniquely virtuous in that they ensure that public preferences drive public policy. Dynamic representation is the outcome of a recurring interaction between electorate and parties that can be observed at the macro level. Preferences can shape government policy via two possible mechanisms. ‘Policy accomodation’ suggests that governments respond directly to the electorate’s preferences. ‘Electoral turnover’, on the other hand, assumes that preferences shape policy indirectly. Parties pursue their ideological goals, and public preferences respond ‘thermostatically’ by moving in the opposite direction to policy. This causes voters to switch votes and eventually leads to a turnover of power from one ‘side’ to ‘the other’. In this paper, we estimate preferences for government activity (‘the policy mood’) in Spain between 1978 and 2017. We show that mood responds ‘thermostatically’ to policy. Variations in mood are associated with support for parties. Policy is driven by party control but is not thermostatically responsive to mood. It appears that in Spain – like Britain – dynamic representation can only be achieved by electoral turnover. We consider the implications of this for our understanding of how representation works.

Keywords

dynamic representationpolicy moodSpainelectionsthermostatic modelmacro polity
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , May 2020 , pp. 133 - 153
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, N., Bartle, J. and Quinn, T. (2018), ‘The impact of the policy mood on party competition and election outcomes in Great Britain, 1945–2015’. Paper presented at the Elections, Public Opinion and Parties conference Royal Holloway, September 2018, University of London.Google Scholar
Bartle, J., Avellaneda, S.D. and McGann, A. (2019), ‘Policy accommodation versus electoral turnover: policy representation in Britain, 1945–2015’, Journal of Public Policy 39(2): 235–265. doi:10.1017/S0143814X18000090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartle, J., Dellepiane Avellaneda, S. and Stimson, J.A. (2011), ‘The moving centre: preferences for government activity in Britain, 1950–2005’, British Journal of Political Science 41(2): 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellucci, P. and Pellegata, A. (2017), ‘Citizens’ policy mood, policies and election outcomes in Italy’, Contemporary Italian Politics 9(1): 8–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernardi, F. and Sarasa, S. (2009), ‘Las nuevas políticas sociales del Gobierno de Zapatero’ in Sánchez-Cuenca, I. and Bosco, A. (eds), La España de Zapatero. Años de cambios 2004–2008, Madrid: Editorial Pablo Iglesias, pp. 227–248.Google Scholar
Blais, A. and Bodet, A. (2006), ‘Does proportional representation foster closer congruence between citizens and policymakers?’, Comparative Political Studies 39(10): 1243–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, A., Blake, D. and Dion, S. (1993), ‘Do parties make a difference? Parties and the size of government in liberal democracies’, American Journal of Political Science 37(1): 40–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, A., Blake, D. and Dion, S. (1996), ‘Do parties make a difference? A reappraisal’, American Journal of Political Science 40(2): 514–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, C. (1996) Partidos políticos, crecimiento e igualdad: estrategias económicas conservadoras y socialdemócratas en la economía mundial, Madrid: Alianza Universidad.Google Scholar
Bosch, A. (2020), ‘The Spanish electoral system’ in Muro, D. and Lago, I. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Spanish Politics, Chapter 23, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 387–407.Google Scholar
Bosch, A. and Duran, I.M. (2019), ‘How does economic crisis impel emerging parties on the road to elections? The case of the Spanish Podemos and Ciudadanos’ Party Politics 25(2): 257–267. doi:10.1177/1354068817710223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budge, I (1994) ‘A new spatial theory of party competition: uncertainty, ideology and policy equilibria viewed comparatively and temporally’, British Journal of Political Science 24(4): 443–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budge, I. and Farlie, D. (1977), Voting and Party Competition, London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Budge, I., Klingemann, H.D., Volkens, A., Bara, J. and Tanenbaum, E. (2001), Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carmines, E.G. and Stimson, J.A. (1990), Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chaqués Bonafont, L. and Palau, A.M. (2011), ‘Assessing the responsiveness of Spanish policymakers to the priorities of their citizens’ West European Politics 34(4): 706–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, P.E, (1964), ‘The nature of belief systems in mass publics’, in Apter, D.E. (ed.), Ideology and Discontent, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
De Boef, S. and Keele, L. (2008), ‘Taking time seriously’, American Journal of Political Science 52(1): 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Arenal, C. (2008), ‘Consenso y disenso en la política exterior de España’. Working Paper No 25/2008. Madrid: Real Instituto Elcano.Google Scholar
Delgado, I., Martínez, A. and Oñate, P. (1998), Parlamento y opinión pública en España, Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.Google Scholar
Ellis, C. and Stimson, J.A. (2012), Political Ideology in America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enders, W. (2004), Applied Econometric Time Series, Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Engle, R.F. and Granger, C.W.J. (1987), ‘Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing’, Econometrica 55(2): 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EPA (Economically Active Population Survey). https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176918&menu=ultiDatos&idp=1254735976595Google Scholar
Epley, N. and Gilovich, T. (2016), ‘The mechanics of motivated reasoning’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 30(3): 133–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, N.R. and MacKinnon, J.G. (2002), ‘Distributions of error correction tests for cointegration’, Econometrics Journal 5(2): 285–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, R.S., MacKuen, M.D. and Stimson, J.A. (2002), The Macro Polity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fernández-Albertos, J. (2012), Democracia intervenida: politicas económicas en la Gran Recesión, Madrid: Catarata.Google Scholar
Fishman, R.M. (2020), ‘Spain in comparative perspective: contributors of the spanish case to comparative political analysis’ in Muro, D. and Lago, I. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Spanish Politics, Chapter 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grant, T. and Lebo, M.J. (2016), ‘Error correction methods with political time series’, Political Analysis 24(1): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. and Jennings, W.J. (2012), ‘Valence as macro-competence: an analysis of mood in party competence evaluations in Great Britain’, British Journal of Political Science 42(2): 311–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther, R. and Montero, J.R. (2009), The Politics of Spain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gunther, R., Montero, J.R. and Puhle, H.J. (2016), ‘Intermediation, voting and citizen participation: evidence from in-depth and longitudinal analyses of Spain’ in Gunther, R., Beck, P.A., Magalhaes, P.C. and Moreno, A. (eds), Voting in Old and New Democracies, London: Routledge, pp. 230–272.Google Scholar
Hakhverdian, A. (2010), ‘Political representation and its mechanisms: a dynamic left-right approach for the United Kingdom, 1976–2006’, British Journal of Political Science 40(4): 835–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keele, L., Linn, S. and Webb, C.M. (2016), ‘Treating time with all due seriousness’, Political Analysis 24(1): 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A.S. (2010), The British Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
King, A.S. (ed.) (2002), Leaders’ Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, M., Benoit, K. and Garry, J. (2003), ‘Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data’, American Political Science Review 97(2): 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, W. (2008), ‘Understanding wordscores’, Political Analysis 16(4): 356–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, J.G. (1994), ‘Asymptotic distribution functions for unit-root and cointegration tests’, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 12(2): 167–176.Google Scholar
Manifesto Research on Political Representation (MARPOR). https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/datasetsGoogle Scholar
May, J.D. (1978), ‘Defining democracy: a bid for coherence and consensus’, Political Studies 26(1): 1–14. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1978.tb01516.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, A. (2014), ‘Estimating the political center from aggregate data: an item response theory alternative to the Stimson dyad ratios algorithm’ Political Analysis 22(1): 115–129. doi:10.1093/pan/mpt022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, A., Dellepiane-Avallaneda, S. and Bartle, J. (2019), ‘Parallel lines? Policy mood in a plurinational democracy’, Electoral Studies 58, 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Lago, M. and Martínez, A. (2002), ‘Political representation in Spain: an empirical analysis of the perception of citizens and MPs’. Journal of Legislative Studies 8(1): 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orriols, L. and Cordero, G. (2016), ‘The breakdown of the Spanish two-party system: the upsurge of Podemos and Ciudadanos in the 2015 general election’, South European Society and Politics 21(4): 469–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orriols, L. and Rico, G. (2014), ‘El clima de opinión’ in Anduiza, E., Bosch, A., Orriols, L. and Rico, G. (eds), Elecciones generales 2011, Madrid: CIS, pp. 63–82.Google Scholar
Page, B.I. and Jones, C.C. (1979), ‘Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties and the vote’, American Political Science Review 73(4): 1071–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, B.I. and Shapiro, R.Y. (1992), The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, C. (2009), ‘Leopoldo Calvo Sotelo: corrigiendo el rumbo de una democracia amenazada’, Revista de Occidente 336: 41–58.Google Scholar
Powell, G.B. (2000), Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Teruel, J. and Barrio, A. (2018b), ‘Ciudadanos: el asalto al centro’ in Llera, F., Baras, M. and Montabes, J. (eds), Las elecciones generales de 2015 y 2016, Madrid: CIS, pp. 249–272.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Teruel, J., Barrio, A. and Barberà, O. (2018a), ‘Podemos: de partido anticasta a confluencia de la plurinacionalidad’ in Llera, F., Baras, M. and Montabes, J. (eds), Las elecciones generales de 2015 y 2016, Madrid: CIS, pp. 207–226.Google Scholar
Romero-Vidal, X. (2019) ‘Two temperatures for one thermostat: the evolution of policy attitudes and support for independence in Catalonia (1991–2018)’, Nations and Nationalism. Early View Online Version. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R. (1980), Do Parties Make a Difference?, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Cuenca, I. (2012) Años de cambios, años de crisis. Ocho años de gobierno socialista 2004–2011, Madrid: Catarata.Google Scholar
Schuman, H. and Presser, S. (1996), Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording and Context, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute). www.sipri.org/databases/milexGoogle Scholar
Soroka, S.N. and Wlezien, C. (2010), Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, J.A. (1999), Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles and Sings, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, J.A. (2004), Tides of Consent: How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, J.A., MacKuen, M.D. and Erikson, R.S. (1995), ‘Dynamic representation’, American Political Science Review 89(3): 543–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, J.A., Thiébaut, C. and Tiberj, V. (2012), ‘The evolution of policy attitudes in France’, European Union Politics 13(2): 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, D.E. (1963), ‘Spatial models of party competition’, American Political Science Review 57(2): 368–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strøm, K. (1990), ‘A behavioural theory of competitive political parties’, American Journal of Political Science 34(2): 565–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torcal, M. (2014), ‘The decline of political trust in Spain and Portugal: economic performance or political responsiveness?’ American Behavioral Scientist 58(12): 1542–1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urquizu, I. (2014), ‘La segunda legislatura de Rodríguez Zapatero’ in Anduiza, E., Bosch, A., Orriols, L. and Rico, G. (eds), Elecciones generales 2011, Madrid: CIS, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
Wilson, C.A. (2000) ‘Policy regimes and policy change’, Journal of Public Policy 20(3): 247–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, C. (1995), ‘The public as thermostat: dynamics of preferences for spending’, American Journal of Political Science 39(4): 981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, C. and Soroka, S.N. (2015b), ‘Electoral systems and opinion representation’, Representation 51(3): 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, C. and Soroka, S.N. (2015a), ‘The majoritarian and proportional visions and democratic responsiveness’, Electoral Studies 40: 539–547.Google Scholar
Zaller, J.R. and Feldman, S. (1992), ‘A simple theory of the survey response: answering questions versus revealing preferences’, American Journal of Political Science 36(3): 579–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bartle et al. supplementary material

Bartle et al. supplementary material

Download Bartle et al. supplementary material(File)
File 20.2 KB