Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:37:28.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Representation through corporatisation: municipal corporations in Italy as arenas for local democracy1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2014

Giulio Citroni ,
Andrea Lippi  and
Stefania Profeti
Giulio Citroni*
Affiliation:
Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy
Andrea Lippi
Affiliation:
Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Firenze, Florence, Italy
Stefania Profeti
Affiliation:
Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
*
*E-mail: giulio.citroni@unical.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The literature on Public Utilities has increasingly shown that the adoption of corporate governance tools for the management of public services in local policy-making has given rise to a considerable reshaping of political strategies and practices. Corporatisation should be understood as not merely a policy instrument, but also as a new opportunity for local politicians to adjust their preferences, to deal with various interests, and to build unusual coalitions. Corporatisation may (and does) influence the concrete operation of local political systems. Today, the boards of municipal enterprises, as well as the public–private partnerships stemming from this emerging tendency towards corporatisation, can be conceived as both actors of local policy-making and arenas in which a number of functions traditionally associated with the mechanisms of electoral representation are performed: inter- and intra-party bargaining, recruitment of élites, and negotiation with local and ‘external’ stakeholders. The paper illustrates the impact of corporatisation on local representation mechanisms in Italy, considering its opaque side with specific reference to the problem of democratic accountability and control, and the creation of new local oligarchies. Empirical evidence is provided from research on municipal enterprises in six different Italian regions. Statistical data on companies (amount of social capital, fields of activity, private and public shareholders, etc.), as well as qualitative data, are analysed in order to show how corporatisation has provided local actors with unusual (and often non-transparent) channels of political representation and public–private bargaining.

Keywords

corporatisationlocal governmentspublic utilitiesgovernancepolitical representationinterest representation
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 63 - 92
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This article is the product of tight collaboration among the three authors. However, for the sole purpose of administrative attribution of authorship, we specify that Andrea Lippi wrote paragraphs 1 and 4, Giulio Citroni wrote paragraph 3, and Stefania Profeti wrote paragraphs 2 and 5. Conclusions were written together by the three authors.

References

Baldwin, R., Cave, M. and Lodge, M. (2011), Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bel, G. and Warner, M.E. (2008), ‘Does privatization of solid waste and water services reduce costs? A review of empirical studies’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52(12): 1337–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bel, G. and Fageda, X. (2010), ‘Partial privatization in local services delivery: an empirical analysis on the choice of mixed firms’, Local Government Studies 36(1): 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bortolotti, B., Scarpa, C. e and Pellizzola, L. (2009), Comuni S.p.A. Il capitalismo municipale in Italia, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Calabrò, A. (2011), Governance Structures and Mechanisms in Public Services Organizations, Berlin: Physica Verlag Springer.Google Scholar
Christensen, J.G. e and Pallesen, T. (2001), ‘The Political Benefits of Corporatization and Privatization’, Journal of Public Policy 21(3): 283–309.Google Scholar
Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2007), ‘The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform’, Public Administration Review 67(6): 1059–1066.Google Scholar
Citroni, G., Lippi, A. and Profeti, S. (2012), Governi privati. Le società partecipate dei comuni, strumento e arena del governo locale, Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.Google Scholar
Citroni, G., Lippi, A. and Profeti, S. (2013), ‘Remapping the State: Inter-Municipal Cooperation through Corporatization and Public-Private Governance Structures’, Local Government Studies 39(2): 208–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citroni, G., Giannelli, N. and Lippi, A. (2008), Chi governa l'acqua? Studio sulla governance locale, Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.Google Scholar
dei Conti, C. (2010), Indagine sul fenomeno delle partecipazioni in società ed altri organismi da parte dei comuni e province (delib. n.14/AUT/2010/FRG), Rome.Google Scholar
Fargion, V., Morlino, L. and Profeti, S. (eds) (2006), Europeizzazione e rappresentanza territoriale. Il caso italiano, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M.P. (1986), ‘Legislator uncertainty, legislative control, and the delegation of legislative power’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 2(1): 33–51.Google Scholar
Gavana, G., Osculati, F. and Zatti, A. (2007), ‘Il capitalismo municipale e le esternalizzazioni fredde’, Amministrare 37(1–2): 7–58.Google Scholar
Grossi, G. and Reichard, C. (2008), ‘Municipal corporatization in Germany and Italy’, Public Management Review 10(5): 597–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heclo, H. (1974), Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden; from relief to income maintenance, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hodge, G.A. and Greve, C. (2009), ‘PPPs: the passage of time permits a sober reflection’, Economic Affairs 29(1): 33–39.Google Scholar
Hood, C. and Peters, G. (2004), ‘The middle aging of new public management: into the age of paradox?’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14(3): 267–282.Google Scholar
Katz, R.S. and Mair, P. (2002), ‘The ascendancy of the party in public office: party organizational change in twentieth-century democracies’, in R Gunther, JR Montero and J Linz (eds), Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 113–135.Google Scholar
King, A. (1975), ‘Overload Problems of Governing in the 1970s’, Political Studies 23(2–3): 284–296.Google Scholar
Morlino, L. (1998), Democracy between Consolidation and Crisis. Parties, Groups, and Citizens in Southern Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, J. (1973), The Fiscal Crisis of the State, New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, S.P. (2011), From the New Public Management to Public Governance, Cheltenham: Elgar Press.Google Scholar
Peters, B.G. (1981), ‘The problem of bureaucratic government’, The Journal of Politics 43(1): 56–82.Google Scholar
Peters, B.G. (2001), The Future of Governing, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2000), Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C., Talbot, C., Caulfield, J. e and Smullen, A. (2005), Agencies: How Governments do Things Through Semi-autonomous Organizations, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, C., Van Thiel, S. and Homburg, V. (eds) (2007), New Public Management in Europe: Adaptation and Alternatives, Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thynne, I. (2010), ‘Ownership as an Instrument of Policy and Understanding in the Public Sphere: Trends and Research Agenda’. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management, Bern, Switzerland April 2010.Google Scholar
Unioncamere (2011), Le società partecipate dagli enti locali. Rapporto 2011, Roma: Retecamere.Google Scholar
Vassallo, S. (ed.) (2013), Le Regioni. Assetto politico-istituzionale e rendimento, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Wollmann, H. and Marcou, G. (eds) (2010), The Provision of Public Services in Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, K. (2004), ‘Agencification in Japan: renaming or revolution?’, in C Pollitt and C Talbot (eds), Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation, London: Routledge, pp. 215–226.Google Scholar