Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:09:45.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When dominant parties adopt proportional representation: the mysterious case of Belgium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2019

Patrick Emmenegger Open the ORCID record for Patrick Emmenegger [Opens in a new window]  and
André Walter Open the ORCID record for André Walter [Opens in a new window]
Patrick Emmenegger
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
André Walter*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
*
*E-mail: andre.walter@unisg.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As the first country to introduce proportional representation (PR), Belgium has attracted considerable attention. Yet, we find the existing explanations for the 1899 breakthrough lacking. At the time of reform, the Catholic Party was politically dominant, advantaged by the electoral system, and facing reformist Socialists. Nevertheless, they single-handedly changed the electoral system and lost 26 seats in the first election under PR. We argue that the Catholics had good reasons to adopt PR. Majoritarian rules tend to create high levels of uncertainty because they provide incentives for non-dominant parties to cooperate. Such electoral coalitions are facilitated by multidimensional policy spaces that make electoral coalitions other than between nonsocialist parties possible. PR reduces the effectiveness of cooperation between non-dominant parties, but such certainty comes at a price. In addition, in the presence of dominant parties, divisions over electoral system reform often result in intra-party conflicts that may be more decisive than inter-party conflicts.

Keywords

proportional representationelectoral system choicesocialist threatelectoral systemBelgium
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , November 2019 , pp. 433 - 450
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, A. (2013), Democracy and the Politics of Electoral System Choice: Engineering Electoral Dominance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, J.T. and Jackman, R.W. (2005), ‘Strategic fools: electoral rule choice under extreme uncertainty’, Electoral Studies 24(1): 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthélemy, J. (1912), L’organisation du suffrage et l’experience belge, Paris: M. Giard et E. Brière.Google Scholar
Bartolini, S. (2000), The Political Mobilization of the European Left, 1860–1980: The Class Cleavage, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, S. and Mair, P. (1990), Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates 1885–1985, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barzachka, N. (2014), ‘When winning seats is not everything: tactical seat-loss during democratization’, Comparative Politics 46(2): 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, A., Dobrzynska, A., and Indridason, I. (2005), ‘To adopt or not to adopt proportional representation: the politics of institutional choice’, British Journal of Political Science 35(1): 182–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, A. and Indridason, I. (2007), ‘Making candidates count: the logic of electoral alliances in two-round legislative elections’, Journal of Politics 69(1): 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, C. (1999), ‘Setting the rules of the game: the choice of electoral systems in advanced democracies’, American Political Science Review 93(3): 609–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, C. (2010), ‘Electoral markets, party strategies, and proportional representation’, American Political Science Review 104(2): 404–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bol, D., Pilet, J.-B., and Riera, P. (2015), ‘The international diffusion of electoral systems: the spread of mechanisms tempering proportional representation across Europe’, European Journal of Political Research 54(2): 384–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, E. (2009), ‘The competitive road to proportional representation: partisan biases and electoral regime change under increasing party competition’, World Politics 61(2): 254–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, J.M. and Hix, S. (2011), ‘The electoral sweet spot: low-magnitude proportional electoral systems’, American Journal of Political Science 55(2): 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomer, J.M. (2005), ‘It’s parties that choose electoral systems (or, Duverger’s laws upside down)’, Political Studies 53(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomer, J.M. (2007), ‘On the origins of electoral systems and political parties: the role of elections in multi-member districts’, Electoral Studies 26(2): 262–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, G. (1997), Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, G., Fiva, J.H., and Smith, D.M. (2019), ‘Parties, legislators, and the origins of proportional representation’, Comparative Political Studies 52(1): 102–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delfosse, P. (2004), ‘Les changements de mode de scrutin en Belgique’, in Laurent, A., Delfosse, P., and Frognier, A.-P. (eds.), Les systems électoraux: permancence et innovations, Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 151–184.Google Scholar
Dupriez, L. (1901), L’organisation de suffrage en Belgique, Paris: Libraire de la société du recueil général des lois et des arrèts.Google Scholar
Emmenegger, P. and Walter, A. (2019), ‘Disproportional Threat. Redistricting as an alternative to proportional representation’, Working Paper.Google Scholar
Goblet D’Alviella, E. (1900), La représentation proportionelle en Belgique. Histoire d’une réforme, Bruxelles: Weissenbruch.Google Scholar
Golder, S.N. (2006), ‘Pre-electoral coalition formation in parliamentary democracies’, British Journal of Political Science 36(2): 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, A. (1999), Origins of Liberal Dominance. State, Church, and Party in Nineteenth-Century Europe, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, S.N. (1996), The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kedar, O., Harsgor, L., and Sheinerman, R.A. (2016), ‘Are voters equal under proportional representation?’, American Journal of Political Science 60(3): 676–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuzer, M. (2010), ‘Historical knowledge and quantitative analysis: the case of the origins of proportional representation’, American Political Science Review 104(2): 369–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachapelle, G. (1911), La Représentation Proportionelle en France et en Belgique, Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Leemann, L. and Mares, I. (2014), ‘The adoption of proportional representation’, Journal of Politics 76(2): 461–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luebbert, G.M. (1991), Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy: Social Classes and the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, T.T and Rose, R. (1982), The International Almanac of Electoral History, London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, G., Mbaye, H.A.D., and Kim, H.M. (2009), ‘Radicalism or reformism? socialist parties before World War I’, American Sociological Review 74(4): 615–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nohlen, D. and Opiela, H. (1969), ‘Belgien’, in Sternberger, D. and Vogel, B. (eds.), Die Wahl der Parlamente und anderer Staatsorgane. Band I: Europa, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 77–124.Google Scholar
Penadés, A. (2008), ‘Choosing rules for government: the institutional preferences of early socialist parties’, in Maravall, J.M. and Sánchez-Cuenca, I. (eds.), Controlling Governments, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 202–246.Google Scholar
Pilet, J.-B. (2007), Changer pour gagner? Les réformes des lois électorales en Belgique, Bruxelles: Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Reibel, C.-W. (2007), Handbuch Der Reichstagswahlen 1890–1918. Bündnisse, Ergebnisse, Kandidaten. Erster Halbband, Düsseldorf: Droste.Google Scholar
Rodden, J. (2009), ‘Why did Western Europe adopt proportional representation? a political geography explanation’, Working Paper.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. (2009), Citizens, Elections, Parties. Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development [1970], Colchester: ECPR.Google Scholar
Schröder, V. and Manow, P. (2019), ‘An intra-party account of electoral system choice’, Political Science Research and Methods. 1–17. forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stengers, J. (2004), ‘Histoire de la législation électorale en Belgique’, Revue belge de Philologie et d’Histoire 82(1–2): 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, A. and Emmenegger, P. (2019), ‘Majority protection? The origins of distorted proportional representation’, Electoral Studies 59: 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woeste, C. (1933), Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire contemporaire de la Belgique. Tome II (1894–1914), Bruxelles: L’édition universelle.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Emmenegger and Walter supplementary material

Emmenegger and Walter supplementary material

Download Emmenegger and Walter supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 203.8 KB