Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:04:58.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

La especificidad de las características clínicas en adultos con trastorno por déficit de atención con hiperactividad: una comparación con pacientes con trastorno límite de la personalidad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2020

J.H. Dowson
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Box 189, Hospital de Addenbrooke, Universidad de Cambridge, CambridgeCB2 2QQ, Reino Unido
A. McLean
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Box 189, Hospital de Addenbrooke, Universidad de Cambridge, CambridgeCB2 2QQ, Reino Unido
E. Bazanis
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Box 189, Hospital de Addenbrooke, Universidad de Cambridge, CambridgeCB2 2QQ, Reino Unido
B. Toone
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Psicológica, Hospital Kings College, Londres, Reino Unido
S. Young
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psicología, Instituto de Psiquiatría, Londres, Reino Unido
T.W. Robbins
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psicología Experimental, Universidad de Cambridge, CambridgeCB2 2QQ, Reino Unido
B. Sahakian
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Box 189, Hospital de Addenbrooke, Universidad de Cambridge, CambridgeCB2 2QQ, Reino Unido
Get access

Resumen

Las características del trastorno por déficit de atención con hiperactividad (TDAH) del DSM-IV en los adultos se pueden encontrar también como parte de otros trastornos psiquiátricos. Este estudio investigó la especificidad de los rasgos del TDAH adulto en relación con los pacientes con trastorno límite de la personalidad (TLP), un síndrome que comparte algunos de sus rasgos intrínsecos con el TDAH y coincide a menudo con él. Un grupo de 20 pacientes adultos seleccionados a partir de un diagnóstico de TDAH y uno de 20 pacientes seleccionados a partir de un diagnóstico de TLP se sometieron a una evaluación por las Escalas de Déficit de Atención para Adultos (ADSA), un instrumento de autoinforme. Se emparejó a los dos grupos en cuanto a la edad, el CI verbal y el género. Siete de las nueve escalas de las ADSA mostraron diferencias entre grupos significativas, que implicaron en particular a la atención, la organización y la persistencia. La escala “Constancia/largo plazo”, que refleja sobre todo el deterioro de la persistencia en la tarea y la meta, fue el mejor discriminador entre los grupos. Además, las puntuaciones en esta escala correlacionaban significativamente con la puntuación de error de una tarea administrada por ordenador de memoria operativa espacial, cuyo rendimiento se ha comunicado que está deteriorado en los pacientes con TDAH. Los resultados proporcionan validación adicional para las ADSA y apoyan una afirmación previa de que las “constancias a largo plazo”, es decir, las relacionadas con la persistencia en la tarea y la meta, son la “cuestión conductual central” para los adultos con TDAH.

Type
Artículo original
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliografía

American Psychiatric Association., Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed., Washington DC: APA; 1987 Revised (DSM-III-R).Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed., Washington DC: APA; 1994 Revised (DSM-IV).Google Scholar
Barkley, R.A., Murphy, KA., Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. A clinical workbook. 2nd ed.New York: The Guilford Press; 1998.Google Scholar
Bazanis, E., Rogers, R.D., Dowson, J.H., Taylor, P., Meux, C., Staley, C., et al.Neurocognitive deficits in decision-making and planning of patients with DSM-III-R borderline personality disorder. Psychol Med 2002; 32:1395-405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conners, CK., Conners’ rating scales-revisad: technical manual. New York: Multi-Health Systems; 2000.Google Scholar
Conners, C.K., Erhardt, D., Sparrow, MA., Conners’ adult ADHD rating scales (CAARS). New York: Multi-Health Systems; 1999. p. 9, 22.Google Scholar
Crean, J.P., de Wit, H., Richards, JB., Reward discounting as a measure of impulsive behaviour in a psychiatric outpatient population. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2000;8(2): 155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daruna, J., Barnes, PA., A neurodevelopmental view of impulsivity. In: McCann, W.G., Johnson, J.L., Shire, M.B., editors. The impulsive client: theory, research and treatment. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 1993.Google Scholar
Derogatis, LR., Brief symptom inventory (BSI): administration, scoring and procedures manual. 3rd ed., Minneapolis (MN): National Computer Systems; 1993.Google Scholar
Dinn, W.M., Robbins, N.C., Harris, CL., Adult attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: neuropsychological correlates and clinical presentation. Brain Cogn 2001;46(1,2): 114–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dowson, JH., Assessment of DSM-III-R personality disorders by selfreport questiounaire: the role of informants and a screening test for co-morbid personality disorders (STCPD). Brit J Psychiat 1992;161:344–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekselius, L., Lindstrom, E., von Knorring, L., Bodlund, O., Kullgren, G., SCID II interviews and the SCID screen questionnaire as diagnostic tools for personality disorder in DSM-III-R. Acta Psychiat Scand 1994;90:120–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evenden, J., Impulsivity: a discussion of clinical and experimental findings. J Psychopharmacol 1999;13(2):180–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faraone, S.V., Biederman, J., Spencer, T., Wilens, T., Seidman, L.J., Mick, E., et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults: an overview. Biol Psychiat 2000;48:9-20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gansler, D.A., Fucetola, R., Krengel, M., Stetson, S., Zimering, R., Makary, C., Are the cognitive subtypes in adult attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder? J Nerv Ment Dis. 1998;186:776–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallagher, R., Blader, J., The diagnosis and neuropsychological assessment of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Scientific study and practical guidelines. Ann NY Acad Sci 2001;931:148–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Gualtieri, C.T., Wargin, W., Kanoy, R., Patrick, K., Shen, D., Youngblood, W., et al.Clinical studies of methylphenidate serum levels in children and adults. J Am Acad Child Psychiat 1982;21:19-26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hornig, M., Addressing co-morbidity in adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiat 1998;59(Supp 17):69-75.Google ScholarPubMed
Hyler, S.E., Rieder, RO., Personality diagnostic questionuaire-revised (PDQ-R). New York: New York State Psychiatric Iustitute; 1987.Google Scholar
Hyler, S.E., Rieder, R.O., Williams, JBW, Spitzer, R.L., Lyons, M., Hend-ler, J., A comparison of clinical and self-report diagnosis of DSM-III personality disorders in 552 patients. Comp Psychiat 1989;30:170–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempton, S., Vance, A., Maruff, P., Luk, E., Costin, J., Pantelis, C., Executive function and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: stimulant medication and better executive function performance in children. Psychol Med 1999;29:527–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linehan, MM., Borderline personality disorder: concepts, controversies and definitions. In: Linehan, M.M., editor. Cognitive-behavioural treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: The Guilford Press; 1993. p. 3.Google Scholar
Lockwood, K.A., Marcotte, A.C., Stern, C., Differentiation of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder subtypes: application of a neuropsychological modal of attention. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2001;23(3):317–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, P., Studies of associated conditions. Antisocial personalitydisorder. Dorchester (UK): Gaskell, Henry Ling; 1999.Google Scholar
Nelson, HE., National adult reading test (NART): test manual. Windsor (UK): NFER-Nelson; 1982.Google Scholar
Norusis, MJ., SPSS 9.0 guide to data analysis. New Jersey: Prentice- Hall Inc; 1999.Google Scholar
Owen, A.M., Downes, J.J., Sahakian, B.J., Polkey, C.E., Robbins, TW., Planning and spatial working memory following frontal lobe lesions in man. Neuropsychologia 1990;28:1021–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfohl, B., Black, D.W., Noyes, R., Coryell, W.H., Barrash, J., Axis I and axis II comorbidity findings: implications for validity. In: Oldham, J.M., editor. Personality disorders: new perspectives on diagnostic validity. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1990. p. 147–61.Google Scholar
Sachdev, P., Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults. Psychol Med 1999;29:507–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spencer, T., Biederman, J., Wilens, T.E., Faraone, SV., Adults with atten- tion-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a controversial diagnosis. J Clin Psychiat 1998;59(Suppl 7):59-68.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R.A., Williams, JBW, Gibbon, M., First, MB., Structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders (SCID-II version 1.0). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1990.Google Scholar
Stuart, S., Pfohl, B., Battaglia, M., Bellodi, L., Grove, W., Cadoret, R., The co-occurrence of DSM-III-R personality disorders. J Pers Dis 1998; 12(4):302–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triolo, S.J., Murphy, K.R., Attention-deficit scales for adults (ADSA). Manual for scoring and interpretation. New York (NY): Brunner/ Maze Inc; 1996.Google Scholar
Wender, PH., Pharmacotherapy of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults. J Clin Psychiat 1998;59(Suppl 7):76–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Wender, P.H., Wolf, L.E., Wasserstein, J., Adults with ADHD An overview. Ann NY Acad Sci 2001;931:1-16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed