Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:36:41.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Una comparación de la validez de dos cuestionarios psiquiátricos de detección selectiva, el Cuestionario Árabe de Salud General (AGHQ) y el Cuestionario de Autoinforme (SRQ-20), en los Emiratos Árabes Unidos utilizando el análisis Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2020

R. Ghubash ,
T. Daradkeh ,
O. F. El-Rufaie  and
M. T. Abou-Saleh
R. Ghubash
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatria y Ciencias Conductuales, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de los Emiratos Árabes Unidos, P. O. Box 17666, Al-Ain, Emiratos Árabes Unidos
T. Daradkeh
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatria y Ciencias Conductuales, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de los Emiratos Árabes Unidos, P. O. Box 17666, Al-Ain, Emiratos Árabes Unidos
O. F. El-Rufaie
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatria y Ciencias Conductuales, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de los Emiratos Árabes Unidos, P. O. Box 17666, Al-Ain, Emiratos Árabes Unidos
M. T. Abou-Saleh
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatria y Ciencias Conductuales, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de los Emiratos Árabes Unidos, P. O. Box 17666, Al-Ain, Emiratos Árabes Unidos
Get access

Resumen

Este estudio comparó la capacidad del Cuestionario Árabe de Salud General (AGHQ) y el Cuestionario de Autoinforme (SRQ-20) para detectar selectivamente trastornos psiquiátricos de la CIE-10 en una comunidad árabe en Al Ain, Emiratos Árabes Unidos. Se llevaron a cabo evaluaciones psiquiátricas estandarizadas de los sujetos utilizando la Entrevista Diagnóstica Internacional Compuesta (CIDI). Se utilizó el análisis Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) para determinar índices de validez para el AGHQ y el SRQ-20. Para el AGHQ, la sensibilidad, la especificidad y el área bajo la curva (ABC) fueron 86, 85 y 93%, respectivamente, mientras que para el SRQ-20, fueron 83, 83 y 90%, respectivamente. Las cualida-des globales del AGHQ fueron significativamente mejores que el del SRQ-20, especialmente en varones y menores de 30 años de edad. Concluimos que ambos cuestionarios son instramentos válidos de detección selectiva en una comunidad árabe en los Emiratos Árabes Unidos.

Keywords

instrumentos de detección selectiva psiquiátricaCORvalidez
Type
Artículo original
Information
European Psychiatry (Ed. Española) , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , May 2001 , pp. 250 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliografía

Araya, R, Wynn, R, Lewis, G. Comparison of two self administered questionnaires (GHQ-12 and SRQ-20) in primary care in Chile. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1992; 27: 168–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Climent, CE, Plutchik, R. Confiabilidad, validez y sensibili-dad de los items de una scala de auto reportage de sin-tomas de enfermedad mental. Rev Colomb Psiquiatria 1980.Google Scholar
Cochrane, R, Stopes-Roe, M. Factors affecting the distribution of psychological symptoms in urban areas of England. Acta Psychiatr Stand 1980; 61: 445–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daradkeh, TK, Ghubash, R, El-Rufaie, OF, Abou-Saleh, MT. The rationale, development and reliability of a new screening psychiatric instrument. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1999; 34: 223–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Rufaie, OEF, Absood, G. Validity study of the self-reporting questionnaire (SRQ-20) in primary health care in the United Arab Emirates. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 1994; 4: 45–53.Google Scholar
El-Rufaie, OF, Daradkeh, TK. Validation of the Arabic versions of the thirty- and twelve-item General Health Questionnaires in primary cure patients. Br J Psychiatry 1996; 169: 662–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Rufaie, OEF, Daradkeh, TK. The Arabic General Health Questionnaire: (AGHQ): a culture relevant version for primary care settings. Prim Care Psychiatry 1997, 3: 141–4.Google Scholar
Ghubash, R. Socio-cultural change and psychiatric disorder: an epidemiological study of women in the Emirate of Dubai (UAE). London: University of London; 1992.Google Scholar
Goldberg, DP. Detecting psychiatric illness by questionnaire. Maudsley Monograph 22. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1972.Google Scholar
Goldberg, DP. Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Windor: NFER Publishing Company; 1978.Google Scholar
Goldberg, DP, Blackwell, B. Psychiatric illness in general practice: a detailed study using new methods of identification. Br MedJ 1970, ii: 439–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, DP, Gater, R, Sartorius, N, Ustun, TB, Piccinelli, M, Gureje, O, et al. Thevalidity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med 1997; 27: 191–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guarnaccia, PJ, Angel, R, Lowe, Worobey J. The factor structure of the CES-D in the Hispanic Health ahd Nutrition Examination Survey: the Influences of ethnicity, gender and language. Soc Sci Med 1989; 29: 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, TW, De, Arango MV, Baltazar, J, Climent, CE, Ibrahim, HHA, Ignacio, LL, et al. Mental disorders in primary health cure a study of their frequency and diagnosis in four developing countries. Psychol Med 1980; 10: 231–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leff, J. Psychiatry around the globe: a transcultural view. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1981.Google Scholar
Mark, JJ, Williams, P. A comparison of the validity of two psychiatric screening questionnaires (GHQ-12 and SRQ-20) in Brazil, using Relative Operations Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Psychol Med 1985; 15: 651–9.Google Scholar
Mark, JJ Williams P. Misclassification by psychiatric screening questionnaires. J Chronic Dis 1986; 39: 371–8.Google Scholar
McCabe, CJ, Thomas, KJ, Brazier, JE, Coleman, P. Measuring the mental health status of a poulation: a comparison of the GHQ-12 and the SF-36 (MHI-5). Br J Psychiatry 1996; 169: 516–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penayo, U, Kullgren, G, Galdera, T. Mental disorders among primary health cure patients in Nicaragua. Acta Psychiatr Stand 1990; 82: 82–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennant, C. The General Health Questionnaire: a valid index of psychological impairment in Australian population. Med J Aust 1997; ii: 392–4.Google Scholar
Torres, P, Alvarez, V. Validez de un Cuestionario Para detectar desordens emocionales (GHQ-12) en estudiantes universitarios; communication preliminar. Rev Psiquiatr 1987; 4: 255–64.Google Scholar
Tyrer, P. Anxiety states. In: Paykel, ES, Ed. Handbook of aflective disorders. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1982.Google Scholar
Verma, SK, Wig, NN. Standardization of a neuroticism questionnaire in Hindi. Indian J Psychiatry 1977; 19: 67–72.Google Scholar
Wing, JK, Cooper, JE, Sartorius, N. The measurement and classification of psychiatric symptoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behvioural disorders-clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Genova: WHO; 1992.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Geneva: WHO; 1993. Google Scholar