Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:12:27.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lists of integrated criteria for the evaluation of taxonomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

J Guerrero
J Guerrero*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatnίa, Hospital Universitario de Sevilla, Avd Dr Fedriani 3, 41009Seville, Spain
Get access

Summary

The systems or lists that make up diagnostic criteria proposed by both classical and modern authors, as well as the usual national or international classifications constitute diagnostic instruments which allow: 1), classification of patients into the most homogeneous groups possible, according to absent-present criteria; 2), research on the propensity for certain criteria to appear, and on their stability; 3), a polydiagnostic approach, not limited to any one reference diagnostic system; 4), a group of psychiatrists to establish the capacity to construct empirical criteria for diagnosis and diagnostic-differential criteria of one or several nosological entities. If this group of psychiatrists is notably representative of a certain country or set of countries, these criteria allow for means of validation of the very empirical criteria established, as well as of the systems and classifications that integrate the instrument used, with their points of agreement and disagreement; 5), the establishment of a correspondence between empirical criteria and conceptual criteria, with predictions as to the application and way of using a new classification or of proposed projects, from the overall perspective of an empirical-conceptual relationship.

Keywords

integrated criteria listsdiagnostic instrumentsdiagnostic criteriapolydiagnostic
Type
Review
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 6 , Issue 6 , 1991 , pp. 287 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association - DSM III (1980) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. APA, Washington DC, 3rd ednGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. APA, Washington DC, 3rd edn revisedGoogle Scholar
Andreasen, NCScheftner, WReich, THirschfeld, RMEndicott, JKeller, MB (1986) The validation of the concept of endogenous depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 43, 246–251CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angst, JMerikangas, KScheidegger, PWicki, W (1990) Recurrent brief depression: a new subtype of affective disorder. J Affective Disord 19, 87–98CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ban, TA (1987) Prolegomenon to the clinical prerequisite: psychopharmacology and the classification of mental disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol 11, 525–580Google ScholarPubMed
Bech, P (1981) Rating scales for affective disorders: their validity and consistency. Acta Psychiatr Scand 64 (suppl 295) 1–101Google Scholar
Bech, P (1990) Clinical target syndromes in psychiatry: latent structure analysis vs factor analysis. 5th AEP Congress, Strasbourg, 17 OctoberGoogle Scholar
Berner, PGabriel, EKatschning, HKieffer, WKoehler, K (1983) Diagnostic Criteria for Schizophrenic and Affective Psychoses. World Psychiatric Association: distributed by the American Psychiatric Press Inc, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
Bonis, M deGuelfi, JDSomogyi, M (1990) Observations psychiatriques en langage naturel, statistique textuelle et classification des depressions. Psychiatr & Psychobiol 5, 1–11Google Scholar
Carney, MWRoth, MGarside, RF (1965) The diagnosis of depressive syndromes and the prediction of ECT response. Br J Psychiatry 111, 659–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekstrom, DQuade, DGolden, RN (1990) Statistical analysis of repeated measures in psychiatric research. Arch Gen Psychiatry 47, 770–772CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feighner, JPRobins, EGuze, SBWoodruff, RAWinokur, GMufioz, R (1972) Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Arch Gen Psychiatry 26, 57–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frances, A (1990) DSM IV: work in progress. 5th AEP Congress, Strasbourg, 17 OctoberGoogle Scholar
Guelfi, JD (1988) Critères diagnostiques, échelles et questionnaires utilisés au cours des dépressions. Psychiatr & Psychobiol 3, 63–70Google Scholar
Grayson, DBridges, KCook, DGoldberg, D (1990) The validity of diagnostic systems for common mental disorders. Psychol Med 20, 209–218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerrero, JPichot, PGiner, J (1986a) Comparación de los criterios franceses y espanoles de psicosis noafectivas. An Psiquiat 2, 62–71Google Scholar
Guerrero, JGomez-Angulo, LGiner, J (1986b) Proyecto de una subescala de melancolóa (“endogeneidad”) en el inventario de Beck. An Psiquiat 1, 13–18Google Scholar
Guerrero, JSanmartin, AGiner, J (1990) French and Spanish empirical criteria for diagnosing depression. Eur Psychiatry (submitted)Google Scholar
Kendell, RE (1989) Clinical validity. Psychol Med 19, 45–55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendler, KSGruenberg, AMTsuang, MT (1985) Subtype stability in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 142, 827–832Google Scholar
Kendler, KS (1990) Toward a scientific psychiatric nosology. Arch Gen Psychiatry 47, 969–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, DF (1974) Endogenomorphic depression. A conceptual and terminological revision. Arch Gen Psychiatry 31, 447–454CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, DF (1989) The pharmacological validation of psychiatric diagnosis. In: The Validity of Diagnosis (Robins, LNBarret, JE eds) Raven Press, NY, 45–57Google Scholar
Paykel, ES (1981) Have multivariate statistic contributed to classification? Br J Psychiatry 139, 357–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pichot, P (1988) Les concepts de la dépression. Psychiatr & Psychobiol 3 (suppl), 1s–3sGoogle Scholar
Pull, CBPull, MCPichot, P (1981) LICET-S: une liste intégrée de critères d'évaluation taxonomiques pour les psychoses non affectives. J Psychiatr Biol 1, 33–37Google Scholar
Pull, CBPull, MCPichot, P (1984) LICET-D: une approche nouvelle du diagnostic de dépression. Ann Méd Psychol 142, 831–847Google Scholar
Pull, CBPull, MCPichot, P (1988) French diagnostic criteria for depression. Psychiatr & Psychobiol 5, 321–328Google Scholar
Spitzer, RLEndicott, JRobins, E (1977) Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) for a Selected Group of Functional Disorders. New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research, New York, 3rd ednGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, RLEndicott, JRobins, E (1985) RDC-Revised. NY State Psychiatr Inst, NIMH Clin Res Branch Collaborative Program on the Psychobiology of Depression, Biometrics Research, New York, 3rd ednGoogle Scholar
Tsuang, MTWoolson, RFWinokur, GCrowe, RR (1981) Stability of psychiatric diagnosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 38, 535–539CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, JKBabor, TBrugha, TBurke, JCooper, JEGiel, MDJablenski, ARegier, DSartorius, N (1990) SCAN: Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry 41, 589–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winokur, G (1974) The division of depressive illness into depression spectrum disease and pure depressive disease. Int Pharmacopsychiatry 9, 5–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, MAKeller, MBLavori, PWScheftner, WAFawcett, JAEndicott, JHirschfeld, RMA (1987) Lack of stability of the RDC endogenous subtype in consecutive episodes of major depression. J Affective Disord 12, 139–143CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, MAFogg, LFScheftner, WAFawcett, (1990) Concordance of symtoms in recurrent depressive episodes. J Affective Disord 20, 79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, M (1990) Is DSM IV needed at all? Arch Gen Psychiatry 47, 974–976CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, MCoryell, WPfohl, BStangl, D (1985) Four definitions of endogenous depression and the dexamethasone suppression test. J Affective Disord 8, 37–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.