Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:48:23.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Patients’ satisfaction with hospitalization in a mixed psychiatric and somatic care unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Ariel Eytan*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
Laurence Bovet
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
Marianne Gex-Fabry
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
Christel Alberque
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
François Ferrero
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
*
*Corresponding author. Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Belle-Idée, 2, Chemin Petit-Bel-Air, 1225 Geneva, Switzerland. Email address: ariel.eytan@hcuge.ch
Get access

Abstract

A patient satisfaction survey was undertaken in a mixed psychiatric and somatic care unit. An anonymous self-report questionnaire covering setting and satisfaction with care was completed by 60 patients. Median age was 42 (range 20–64), and the majority female (63%). Main ICD-10 diagnostic categories were depressive disorders (51.7%), substance-related disorders (33%) and personality disorders (25%). Somatic comorbidity was present in 60% of patients. Overall satisfaction with care and setting was high. Higher satisfaction was significantly associated with a history of previous hospitalizations in a psychiatric hospital and with being referred to the program by a psychiatrist. These findings emphasize the perceived advantages of mixed units, such as decreased stigmatization of psychiatric inpatients and opportunity to receive adequate treatment for both physical and mental problems during a single hospital stay.

Type
Short communication
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buckley, PFreyne, AWalshe, N.The medical–psychiatry unit. A pilot study of conjoint care within an Irish general hospital. Psychosomatics 1994;35(6):515–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Felker, BYazel, JJShort, D.Mortality and medical comorbidity among psychiatric patients: a review. Psychiatr Serv 1996;47(12):1356–63.Google ScholarPubMed
Gertler, REKopec-Schrader, EMBlackwell, CJ.Evolution and evaluation of a medical psychiatric unit. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1995;17(1): 26–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harsch, HHKoran, LMYoung, L.A profile of academic medical– psychiatric units. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1991;13(5):291–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holcomb, WRParker, JCLeong, GB, et al. Customer satisfaction and self-reported treatment outcomes among psychiatric inpatients. Psy-chiatr Serv 1998;49(7):929–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kathol, RG. Medical psychiatry units: the wave of the future. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1994;16(1):1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kathol, RGHarsch, HHShakespeare, A, et al. Categorization of types of medical/psychiatry units based on level of acuity. Psychosomatics 1992;33(4):376–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyketsos, CGDunn, GKaminsky, MJ, et al. Medical comorbidity in psychiatric inpatients: relation to clinical outcomes and hospital length of stay. Psychosomatics 2002;43(1):24–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marra, DAlliaire, JFPiette, JC.Medical–psychiatric unit, a concept to be developed (article in French). La Revue de Médecine Interne 2003;24:279–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nomura, SShigemura, JNakamura, M, et al. Evaluation of the first medical psychiatry unit in Japan. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1996; 50(6):305–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoudemire, ACHill, DMorris, R, et al. The medical–psychiatric unit as a site for outcome research in dementia/depression syndromes. Psychiatr Med 1991;9(4):535–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.